Agenda Comparison Grid Brief Assignment

Agenda Comparison Grid Brief Assignment

Agenda Comparison Grid Brief Assignment

Each administration in the White House has different agendas based in the healthcare issues and concerns. These concerns and issues become presidential agendas because of their impact on public health system and the wellbeing of individuals. The opioid epidemic is a national public health concern with many presidents making it a component of their agendas. Making the opioid epidemic a presidential issue is important in getting solutions to the problem because of its devastating effects on health outcomes and quality of life for affected individuals. By 2019, over 10 million individuals aged 12 years and above misused opioids while the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIH) asserts that close to 92,000 persons died because of drug-related overdose in 2020; these including illicit drugs as well as prescription opioids (Felter, 2021). The purpose of this paper is to compare the presidential policy agendas between the current president, Biden administration, and the previous, Trump administration on the opioid epidemic or crisis

Identify the Population Health concern you selected.	Opioid Epidemic
Describe the Population Health concern you selected.	The opioid epidemic entails the use of prescription drugs, non-prescription drugs and illicit substances. The genesis of the issue is an assurance by pharmaceutical companies that use of opioids for pain relieve does not lead to addiction. However, increased prescription of opioids led to widespread misuse before it became apparent that these medications were highly addictive. The federal government through the Health and Human Service (HHS) department declared opioids a public health emergency and later on an epidemic that requires mitigation measures (DHHS, 2021). The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) asserts that close to 90,000 individuals died due to opioid-related overdose in 2020 while the epidemic costs the economy over $78 billion annually because of expenses associated with the treatment, healthcare costs, and rehabilitation among other aspects. The DHHS has developed a 5-point strategy to deal with the epidemic by empowering communities to tackle it with the aim of reducing morbidity and mortality.
Administration (President Name)	Current President Biden and His Administration	Previous President Trump and His Administration
Explain how each of the two presidential administrations approached the issue.	The Biden administration through the American Rescue plan (ARP) and expansion of Affordable Care Act (ACA) focuses in improving access to quality health care with emphasis on treatment and rehabilitation of substance use disorder (SUD) as well as mental health (Ellerbeck, 2020). The expansion of health insurance coverage is a core aspect of dealing with the opioid epidemic by the current administration. The administration has also enhanced access to overdose treatment and prevention efforts to improve community response to the issue.	The last administration tackled the issue by increasing border patrols and getting tough on immigrants perceived to getting into the country to engage in illegal and illicit drug trafficking activities. Through the efforts like building of wall on the Mexican border, the amount of heroin seized and arrests by the federal government doubled (Frank & Haffjee, 2019). The administration declared the opioid crisis a national emergency as one of the initiatives to address the problem.
Identify the allocations of resources that the current and previous presidents dedicated to this issue.	The current administration allocated about $125 billion to help address this national concern or issue. These resources are meant to develop prevention programs, treatment interventions, recovery efforts, community empowerment, and education.	The previous administration of Trump has allocated about $13 billion to help law enforcement agencies develop new programs in response to the crisis (Wen & Sadeghi, 2020). The administration gave out another $1.6 billion to states and counties with high prevalence of drug use. The administration also allocated another $23 billion to improve border security and $21 billion for improvement of the infrastructure.

Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis

Using the information you recorded in Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid, complete the following to document information about the population health/healthcare issue you selected

 

Administration	Biden Administration	Trump Administration
Which administrative agency (like HHS, CDC, FDA, OHSA) would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected? Why is this agency the most helpful?	The Biden administration uses the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) through the National Institute on Drug Abuse and the Health and human services department (HHD) (Robeznieks, 2021). The agency is the most helpful since it collects data and develops interventions as well as coordinates responses to public health emergencies that include pandemics and epidemics. The CDC and its affiliated agencies like the National Institute of Health are useful in the opioid crisis because of the expertise and resources allocated to it to handle public health emergencies and concerns.	The Trump administration was keen on using the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) along the border as well as Border Security under the department of Homeland Security (Frank & Haffjee, 2019). The DEA is responsible for controlling entry of any drugs and illicit substances into the country along its borders. The DEA is a federal agency that deals with enforcement of measures to prevent the transportation of illicit drugs, especially from foreign nations into the United States. Therefore, the Trump administration considered it the most appropriate agency in its war against drugs and the opioid crisis.
How do you think your selected healthcare issue might get on the presidential agenda? How does it stay there?	The healthcare issue is already a national public emergency and an epidemic. Upon its identification, proposals on how to address it arise and forwarded to a representative, mainly a Congressional member who brings the issue through developing a bill. Therefore, the issue becomes a presidential agenda when legislators discuss it and make recommendations on how to address it through a bill which is sent to the president for approval so it becomes law.	The opioid epidemic is a national public health issue that requires attention by all stakeholders, especially those in political positions like presidents and their administrations. Lobbying for effective measures to curb the opioid crisis attracts attention of all players, especially those in the political space. Therefore, getting the issue to be a presidential agenda needs using different aspects of lobbying that include legislators who can present the issue as part of their overall political promises and legislate on measures to address it.
Who would you choose to be the entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor (this can be a celebrity, a legislator, an agency director, or others) of the healthcare issue you selected? An example is Michael J. Fox a champion for Parkinson’s disease.	The opioid epidemic is a health concern that affects millions of American families and individuals. Therefore, the individuals to advance this issues should be those victims who have recovered from the drug addictions; these could be celebrities who once battled drug addictions. Healthcare stakeholders would also be champions for issue as they deal with different people who battle opioids and require interventions.	The opioid crisis is a national emergency that requires effective measures by all stakeholders to address. In this case, I would select elected representatives to champion the issue so that it gets to be a presidential agenda. Lobbying for measures to curb and prevent the opioid crisis is essential in addressing its detrimental effects on populations and individuals. I believe that having elected representatives championing the issue would lead to formulation of relevant bills to be presented to Congress for effective development of strategies to deal with the crisis.

Part 3 Narrative

The opioid epidemic is a critical health concern and public emergency affecting millions of individuals and families across the country and need long-term approaches. The current administration and the previous one by Trump have different approaches and strategies to address opioids a public health issue. The issue is critical because of its adverse effects on individuals, especially those addicted, and the whole communities (Ellerbeck, 2020). Statistics from federal agencies and departments show that close to 90,000 individuals lose their lives every year because of the crisis while many individuals and families bore the brunt of socioeconomic conditions that the epidemic creates in their different spheres of life. It is critical that the issue becomes part of the presidential agenda during any election cycle in the country (Felter, 2021). The opioid epidemic is a national health issue and needs use of evidence-based practice interventions to help mitigate its effects on individuals, homes, and communities.

Recovered or former addicts and healthcare providers like nurses are essential components of addressing the problem because of their unique positions. For instance, nurses are critical healthcare providers and frontline caregivers who interact with patients and carry out some of the interventions recommended by physicians. As care coordinators, they can advocate for patients for better care through the evidence-based practice (EBP) interventions to tackle the problem of opioids (Wen & Sadeghi, 2020). Nurses understand the extent of opioid crisis and effects on individuals. Therefore, working with survivors or recovering and recovered addicts, they can influence the formulation of policies to deliver interventions to reduce the prevalence of the condition. The involvement of nurses and former addicts ensures that they present pertinent issues which affect patients and hinder the delivery of better care, especially through the deployment of evidence-based practice in the opioid epidemic situation. The inclusion of these two stakeholders is critical because their interventions would be based on experience and expertise to develop better mitigations.

Conclusion

The opioid epidemic is a national health concern despite the emergence and reemergence of infectious diseases and needs all administrations at national and state levels to deal with it. The analysis shows the need to have stakeholders who understand and have experience in developing interventions to help reduce the impact on individuals and communities. The emergence of COVID-19 may have exacerbated the situation on how to deal with the epidemic. Stakeholders should support government to create better interventions to mitigate the prevalence of opioid addiction.

References

Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) (2021). 5-Point Strategy to Combat the Opioid Crisis.

https://www.hhs.gov/opioids/about-the-epidemic/hhs-response/index.html

Felter, C. (2021). The U.S. Opioid Epidemic. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/us-opioid-epidemic

Frank, R. G. & Haffjee, R. L. (2019). The Trump Administration’s Actions to Address the Opioids Public Health Crisis–Reply.

JAMA Psychiatry, 2019;76(1):101-102. doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.2761

Ellerbeck, A. (2020). The Health 202: Biden will also have the opioid epidemic to deal with amid the coronavirus pandemic.

The Washington Post.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/11/16/health-202-biden-will-also-have-opioid-epidemic-deal-with-amid-coronavirus-pandemic/

Robeznieks, A. (2021). Biden administration boosts access to overdose prevention, treatment.

https://www.ama-assn.org/delivering-care/opioids/biden-administration-boosts-access-overdose-prevention-treatment

Wen, L. S. & Sadeghi, N. B. (2020). The opioid crisis and the 2020 US election: crossroads for a national epidemic.

Lancet, 396(10259):1316-1318. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32113-9.

ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT: Agenda Comparison Grid Brief Assignment

Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief Assignment Template for Part 1 and Part 2

Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid

Use this Agenda Comparison Grid to document information about the population health/healthcare issue your selected and the presidential agendas. By completing this grid, you will develop a more in depth understanding of your selected issue and how you might position it politically based on the presidential agendas.

am in the Psychiatry mental health nurse practitioner program
I have attached the instructions on how to write this couse work. i have attached a blank template to use. i have also attached a student course work as an example on how to complete this work please use it as a guide. i have also attached all required photocopies of the book for reading purposes and articles need please us APA
Please use Mental Health Issue (Depression) as health care issue
Please use Donald Trump, Barack Obama and George Bush as the three presidents to compare

You will use the information in the Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid to complete the remaining Part 2 and Part 3 of your Assignment.

Identify the Population Health concern you selected.

Tobacco and Alcohol Use

Describe the Population Health concern you selected and the factors that contribute to it.

According to CDC, approximately, 85,000 death occur each year in the United States are attributed to alcohol abuse and 5,000 infants are born each year with fetal alcohol syndrome. So, also, approximately, 440,000 deaths occur each year that attributed to cigarette smoking, which makes it leads preventable cause of death in the United States.

Administration (President Name)

(Current President)

Donald Trump

(Previous President)

Barack Obama

(Previous President)

George W. Bush

Describe the administrative agenda focus related to this issue for the current and two previous presidents.

August 29th, 2018, President Donald Trump announced $90.9 million in grants to 731 local drug prevention coalitions. The grants will provide local community coalitions funding to prevent youth substance use, including prescription drugs, marijuana, tobacco, and alcohol. (The White House 2018).

President Obama declared “The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act” In the year 2009 also provides FDA with regulatory authority to regulate marketing and promotion of tobacco products and set performance standards for tobacco products to protect the public health.

December 2014, The Obama administration remains steadfast in its commitment to reduce drug use and its consequences—and we know that the best way to reduce drug use is to prevent it from ever starting.

Presidential Obama announced Proclamation — National Alcohol and Drug Addiction Recovery Month, 2016. (“Presidential Proclamation — National Alcohol and Drug Addiction Recovery Month, 2016,” 2016).

A proclamation made by president George W. Bush, in 2007. Our Nation is committed to the health and well-being of our youth. On Child Health Day, we reaffirm our commitment to helping children develop good nutrition habits and active lifestyles, so that they can grow into healthy and productive adults (“Child Health Day, 2007,” 2007).

Children today face many risks, such as alcohol and drug use, obesity, smoking, and other dangers. As parents and role models to America’s youth, we have a responsibility to teach them about the importance of healthy behavior, daily exercise, and good nutrition.

Identify the allocations of financial and other resources that the current and two previous presidents dedicated to this issue.

President Trump announced $90.9 million in grants to 731 local drug prevention coalitions.

The grants will provide local community coalitions funding to prevent youth substance use, including prescription drugs, marijuana, tobacco, and alcohol. President Trump and the ONDCP Deputy Director James W. Carroll hosted a roundtable discussion with DFC grant awardees and Youth Representatives at the White House.

President Barack Obama proposed investing $1 billion to expand access to treatment for prescription opioid misuse and heroin use. He continued to urge the Congress to fund treatment like he have proposed — because if they fund these efforts, we can help more individuals across our country seek help, complete treatment, and sustain recovery.

The President proposed a three-year, $150-million initiative to help youth at risk of gang influence and involvement. Through grants to faith-based and community organizations targeting youth ages 8-17, the initiative will help some of America’s communities that are most in need. These organizations will provide a positive model for youth – one that respects women and rejects violence.

Explain how each of the presidential administrations approached the issue.

President Donald Trump said he will continue to provide grants to the DFC Program for the community coalitions to strengthen the infrastructure among local partners to create and sustain a reduction in local youth substance use.

President Obama said he will continue urging the Congress to fund treatment like I have proposed — because if they fund these efforts, we can help more individuals across our country seek help, complete treatment, and sustain recovery.

President Obama declared National Alcohol and Drug Addiction Recovery Month (“Presidential Proclamation — National Alcohol and Drug Addiction Recovery Month, 2016,” 2016).

President George W. Bush addressed the issue of alcohol and tobacco use in the population by focusing on young adult and supporting organization that provide positive model to youth.

References

President Trump Awards an Historic Number of DFC Grants to Prevent Youth Substance Use. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/president-trump-awards-historic-number-dfc-grants-prevent-youth-substance-use/

Presidential Proclamation — National Alcohol and Drug Addiction Recovery Month, 2016. (2016, August 31). Retrieved from https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2016/08/31/presidential-proclamation-national-alcohol-and-drug-addiction-recovery

Fact Sheet: Helping America’s Youth. (2005, February 2). Retrieved from https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2005/02/20050202-15.html

Child Health Day, 2007. (2007, October 1). Retrieved from https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2007/10/20071001-4.html

Part 2: Agenda Comparison Grid Analysis

Using the information you recorded in Part 1: Agenda Comparison Grid, complete the following to document information about the population health/healthcare issue your selected

Administration (President Name)

(Current President)

(Previous President)

(Previous President)

Which administrative agency would most likely be responsible for helping you address the healthcare issue you selected?

How do you think your selected healthcare issue might get on the agenda for the current and two previous presidents? How does it stay there?

Who would you choose to be the entrepreneur/ champion/sponsor of the healthcare issue you selected for the current and two previous presidents?

Note: Part 3: of the Module 1: Assignment: Agenda Comparison Grid and Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief is a 1-page Fact Sheet or Talking Points Brief the you will create in a separate document.

© 2018 Laureate Education Inc. 2

You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.

Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.

Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.

The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.

Often you must do some homework to discover if a source is biased: It is not sufficient to note that the source declares itself to be. nonp.trtisan. Do you think that the American Nurses Association (ANA) is biased? Would you freely, without hesitation or annotation of materials, use content from the ANA? The ANA is a trade association /s pecial-interes t group for professional nurses and educators . It is biased in favor of the welfare of its members and all nur ses. If you search for endorse ments of political candidates by ANA, you will learn that ANA predominantly supports Democrats. This is not earth-shattering news and should not prevent you from using ANA materials; however, it should inform you about how and when to use these references.

There are thousands of special-interestgroups and organizatio ns in the United States. In the following subsectio ns, we take a look at two influential organ izatio ns located in Washington , D.C.

Required Readings

Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide (6th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

• Chapter 1, “Informing Public Policy: An Important Role for Registered Nurses” (pp. 11–13 only)
• Chapter 2, “Agenda Setting: What Rises to a Policymaker’s Attention?” (pp. 17–36)
• Chapter 10, “Overview: The Economics and Finance of Health Care” (pp. 171–180)
• Chapter 12, “An Insider’s Guide to Engaging in Policy Activities”
  • “Creating a Fact Sheet” (pp. 217-221)

• DeMarco, R., & Tufts, K. A. (2014). The mechanics of writing a policy brief. Nursing Outlook, 62(3), 219–224. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2014.04.002
• Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

Kingdon, J. W. (2001). A model of agenda-setting, with applications. Law Review, M.S.U.-D.C.L., 2(331).

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

Lamb, G., Newhouse, R., Beverly, C., Toney, D. A., Cropley, S., Weaver, C. A., Kurtzman, E., … Peterson, C. (2015). Policy agenda for nurse-led care coordination. Nursing Outlook, 63(4), 521–530. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2015.06.003

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

O’Rourke, N. C., Crawford, S. L., Morris, N. S., & Pulcini, J. (2017). Political efficacy and participation of nurse practitioners. Policy, Politics, and Nursing Practice, 18(3), 135–148. doi:10.1177/1527154417728514

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Enhancing Environmental Health Content in Nursing Practice, Pope, A. M., Snyder, M. A., & Mood, L. H. (Eds.). (n.d.). Nursing health, & environment: Strengthening the relationship to improve the public’s health. Retrieved September 20, 2018.

Note: You will access this article from the Walden Library databases.

https://www.usa.gov/federal-agencies/a

https://www.usa.gov/executive-departments

https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-trump-administration/the-cabinet/

Milstead, J. A., & Short, N. M. (2019). Health policy and politics: A nurse’s guide (6th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

• Chapter 1, “Informing Public Policy: An Important Role for Registered Nurses” (pp. 11–13 only)
• Chapter 2, “Agenda Setting: What Rises to a Policymaker’s Attention?” (pp. 17–36)
• Chapter 10, “Overview: The Economics and Finance of Health Care” (pp. 171–180)
• Chapter 12, “An Insider’s Guide to Engaging in Policy Activities”
  • “Creating a Fact Sheet” (pp. 217-221)

Syllabus

Student Support and Calendar Information
So you have all key information available to you off-line, it is highly recommended that you print the following items for your reference:

This Syllabus, including the Course Schedule that is linked on this page as a PDF
Course Calendar
Support, Guidelines, and Policies
Photo Credit: Sam Edwards / Caiaimage / Getty Images
Credit Hours
5 credits in 11 weeks
Walden University assigns credit hours based on the number and type of assignments that enable students to achieve the course learning objectives. In general, each semester credit equals about 42 hours of total student work and each quarter credit equals about 28 hours of total student work. This time requirement represents an approximate average for undergraduate work and the minimum expectations for graduate work. The number and kind of activities estimated to fulfill time requirements will vary by degree level and student learning style, and by student familiarity with the delivery method and course content.

Course Description
In today’s rapidly changing healthcare delivery system, decisions made within the political arena impact the future of health delivery systems, healthcare professionals, and the populations they serve. In this course, students examine the policy process and its impact on healthcare delivery, cost, quality, and access. Students examine the importance of getting healthcare issues on federal and state agenda, investigate governmental response through legislation and regulation, and identify where they can advocate for positive outcomes in program/policy design, implementation, and evaluation. Global health issues are examined for their relevance and impact on the development of the nurse advocate. Through discussions, reflection, case studies, and the application of professional communications techniques as political tactics to influence policy outcomes, students demonstrate integration of policy deci