Assignment: NRS-410V Case Study

Assignment: NRS-410V Case Study

ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT: Assignment: NRS-410V Case Study

The 32year old Mr. C who has had the challenge of being overweight since childhood presents to the clinic inquiring about the possibility of undergoing bariatric surgery. He has been experiencing leg swelling, shortness of breath during physical activity, and pruritus. He is employed at the catalog telephone center and reports to have both high blood pressure and sleep apnea that he has been managing by restriction of sodium intake. His laboratory assessment reveals deranged kidney functions, hyperglycemia, and dyslipidemia whereas his physical assessment shows morbid obesity and high blood pressure. The purpose of this assignment is to explain Mr. C’s clinical manifestation and the risks he faces due to obesity, then discuss the functional health patterns identified in the case study, describe the staging of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and ESRD prevention strategies that could be employed for Mr. C.

Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on Assignment: NRS-410V Case Study  completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW

Mr. C’s Clinical Manifestations

            Mr. C reports that he has had problems with being overweight since childhood with 100pounds being gained in the previous 2-3years. Currently, he complains of sleep apnea, high blood pressure, easy fatigability, ankle edema, and pruritus. Further, his objective assessment reveals high blood pressure, elevated fasting blood sugar, dyslipidemia, and deranged liver function owing to the elevated BUN and serum creatinine. Most of these patients’ presentations are related to being obese.

online nursing essays

Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on Assignment: NRS-410V Case Study done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

Patients who are obese have increased fat storage in the adipose tissues. These fat deposits increase the fatty acid availed to the liver for conversion into triglycerides which contributes to dyslipidemia (Vekic et al., 2019). When the serum cholesterol and lipids are deposited into the vessel walls, they lead to atherosclerosis by stiffening the vessel walls and narrowing the lumen. Given the blood pressure depends on the size of the lumen of the vessel, the narrowed lumen due to dyslipidemia would lead to hypertension (Shariq & McKenzie, 2020). Further, obesity also leads to increased serum levels of glucose due to increased conversion of lipids to glucose. The obese patients are therefore at risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) (Ortega et al., 2020). Hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia are risk factors for kidney disease.

Hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia may lead to atherosclerosis including that of renal arteries. This impairs the blood supply to the kidney parenchyma which can then lead to its necrosis, scarring, and eventual kidney damage (de Leeuw et al., 2018). Kidney damage and kidney failure affect the excretion of water, toxins such as urea, and even creatine thus leading to edema of the legs and uremic pruritus (Vekic et al., 2019). Clinical manifestations of Mr. C, therefore, developed as complications of obesity.

Potential Health Risks of Obesity

            The potential risks of obesity as has manifested in Mr. C include type 2 DM, hypertension, and dyslipidemia. These may then cause narrowing of the vessels thus predisposing to cardiovascular events such as myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular events including stroke, and even end organ damages such as renal failure (Shariq & McKenzie, 2020). These complications should be addressed by strict lipid control and weight reduction strategies.

One of the strategies for weight reduction is a bariatric surgery that involves modifying the gastrointestinal tract to bypass the gastric bypass to minimize the absorption of nutrients (Arterburn et al., 2020). These surgeries would be appropriate for Mr. C whose weight reduction has not been possible through modification of diet. He has also met other conditions for the surgery including being diabetic and hypertensive, morbidly obese but with a weight less than 450pounds thus appropriateness of the surgery (Nedeljkovic-Arsenovic et al., 2020).

Functional Health Patterns

            Different health patterns are recognized in the Case study including health perception, health management, healthcare prevention measures, and complications of the underlying disease. Mr. C has recognized that he has problems of being overweight manifested since childhood and the recent weight gain of 100pounds. His perception of health is further evident by his need for bariatric surgery. He reports that he has attempted to manage his weight by employing salt reduction in his diet which would serve both as health management and nutrition modification. His metabolic disturbances are identified in the laboratory reports that indicate hyperglycemia, dyslipidemia, and renal derangements with elevated BUN and creatinine. Some of these disturbances such as elevated BUN and creatinine resulted from deranged renal elimination processes. He also reports a sedentary lifestyle due as he works as a telephone cataloguer thus contributing to the weight challenges. His sleep is affected by the weight, he is cognizant of his current health challenge, although the role relationship, sexuality, and stress coping strategies are not reported. From such assessment, we can conclude that the health problems include sleep apnea, hypertension, end-stage renal disease, and obesity and their complications.

Stages of End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD)

            Different criteria are used during the staging of ESRD with most of them considering the glomerular filtration rates (GFR), sodium retention or creatinine clearance rates, and severity of albuminuria (Chen et al., 2019). Stage 1 ESRD has kidney damage with GFR of more than ≥90 mL/min/1.73 m2, stage 2 GFR between 60–89, stage 3 GFR between 30-59, stage 4 has GFR of 15-29 whereas stage 5 is a renal failure with GFR less than 15 (de Leeuw et al., 2018). In Mr. C some of the predisposing factors included hypertension, dyslipidemia, obesity, and diabetes mellitus which posed a risk of kidney damage.

ESRD Prevention and Health Promotion Measures

ESRD prevention seeks to modify the risk factors that have been identified in Mr. c. Some of the strategies that would be emphasized during patient education are encouraging him to adopt aerobic exercise, dietary modification, or undergoing bariatric surgery to help with weight reduction (Shariq & McKenzie, 2020). Other measures also include strict blood pressure, glycemic and lipid control through adherence to prescribed medication, daily weight monitoring, and regular monitoring of blood sugar and serum lipid levels (Vekic et al., 2019). These preventive and promotive measures help reduce the deterioration of the kidney damage thus enhancing the health status of the patient.

Resources for Non-acute Care of ESRD Patients

            ESRD reduces an individual’s performance thus the need for non-acute care to improve the long-term management of the disease. The patient has deranged kidney performance with reduced renal clearance and is thus at risk of accumulation of toxins that may pose different risks to the patient including uremic gastritis, pruritis, and encephalopathy. This leads to the need for hemodialysis twice weekly. The patients may therefore be given a portable hemodialysis device with vascular access (Nowak & Kusztal, 2021). They may also benefit from renal rehabilitative services, financial assistance, and job-protected leaves to facilitate their recovery.

Conclusion

            In conclusion, the assessment of Mr. C’s case study informs the need for bariatric surgery. The obesity has predisposed him to develop diabetes, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and sleep apnea that would be addressed by lifestyle modification. It has also led to ESRD that will require non-acute care services such as portable hemodialysis devices, rehabilitative services, financial assistance, and job-protected leaves to assist in enhanced health status.

References

Arterburn, D. E., Telem, D. A., Kushner, R. F., & Courcoulas, A. P. (2020). Benefits and risks of bariatric surgery in adults: A review: A review. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association324(9), 879–887. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.12567

Chen, T. K., Knicely, D. H., & Grams, M. E. (2019). Chronic kidney disease diagnosis and management: A review: A review. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association322(13), 1294–1304. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.14745

de Leeuw, P. W., Postma, C. T., Spiering, W., & Kroon, A. A. (2018). Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: Should we intervene earlier? Current Hypertension Reports20(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11906-018-0829-3

Nedeljkovic-Arsenovic, O., Banovic, M., Radenkovic, D., Rancic, N., Polovina, S., Micic, D., & Nedeljkovic, I. (2020). Five-year outcomes in bariatric surgery patients. Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)56(12), 669. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina56120669

Nowak, K., & Kusztal, M. (2021). Cardiac implantable electronic devices in hemodialysis and chronic kidney disease patients-an experience-based narrative review. Journal of Clinical Medicine10(8), 1745. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10081745

Ortega, M. A., Fraile-Martínez, O., Naya, I., García-Honduvilla, N., Álvarez-Mon, M., Buján, J., Asúnsolo, Á., & de la Torre, B. (2020). Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Associated with obesity (diabesity). The central role of gut Microbiota and its translational applications. Nutrients12(9), 2749. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12092749

Shariq, O. A., & McKenzie, T. J. (2020). Obesity-related hypertension: a review of pathophysiology, management, and the role of metabolic surgery. Gland Surgery9(1), 80–93. https://doi.org/10.21037/gs.2019.12.03

Vekic, J., Zeljkovic, A., Stefanovic, A., Jelic-Ivanovic, Z., & Spasojevic-Kalimanovska, V. (2019). Obesity and dyslipidemia. Metabolism: Clinical and Experimental92, 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2018.11.005

Case Study Mr. C Grand Canyon University Pathophysiology and Nursing Management of Clients Health NRS-410V. It is necessary for an RN-BSN-prepared nurse to demonstrate an enhanced understanding of the pathophysiological processes of disease the clinical manifestations and treatment protocols and how they affect clients across the life span. Evaluate the Health History and Medical Information.

Learning outcome:

LO8:

Name:

Instructions and guidelines (Read carefully)
Instructions

Insert your name and surname in the space provided above, as well as in the file name. Save the file as: First name Surname Assignment 4 – e.g. Lilly Smith Assignment 4. NB: Please ensure that you use the name that appears in your student profile on the Online Campus.
2     Write all your answers in this document. There is an instruction that says, “Start writing here” under each question. Please type your answer there.

3     Submit your assignment in Microsoft Word only. No other file types will be accepted.

4     Do not delete the plagiarism declaration or the assignment instructions and guidelines. They must remain on your assignment when you submit.

PLEASE NOTE: Plagiarism cases will be penalised according to the Head Tutor’s and GetSmarter’s discretion.

IMPORTANT NOTICE: Please ensure that you have checked your course calendar for the due date for this assignment.

Guidelines

1     There are eight pages and one question in this assignment.

2     Make sure that you have carefully read and fully understood the questions before answering them. Answer the questions fully but concisely and as directly as possible. Follow all specific instructions for individual questions (e. g. “list”, “in point form”).

3     Answer all questions in your own words. Do not copy any text from the notes, readings or other sources. The assignment must be your own work only.

Plagiarism Declaration:
1. I know that plagiarism is wrong. Plagiarism is to use another’s work and pretend that it is one’s own.

2. This assignment is my own work.

3. I have not allowed, and will not allow, anyone to copy my work with the intention of passing it off as his or her own work.

4. I acknowledge that copying someone else’s assignment (or part of it) is wrong, and declare that my assignments are my own work.
2. Mark allocation
Each question receives a mark allocation. However, you will only receive a final percentage mark and will not be given individual marks for each question. The mark allocation is there to show you the weighting and length of each question.

TOTAL                                                                                                          50

Assignment instructions
Complete Question 1 in this document. Make sure you have read Modules 3 and 4 before completing this assignment.

Note:

Make sure that you show all your workings within the assignment when calculations are required.

You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.

Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.

Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.

The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.

Rubric Criteria

Total 120 points

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Less Than Satisfactory

3. Satisfactory

4. Good

5. Excellent

Documentation of Sources

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

0 points

Sources are not documented.

2.7 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

2.84 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

3.2 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3.6 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

Diagnoses and Secondary Diagnoses

Diagnoses and Secondary Diagnoses

0 points

A discussion on what primary and secondary medical diagnoses should be considered for Mr. M. is omitted; or, medical diagnoses presented are inaccurate.

9 points

A partial discussion on what primary and secondary medical diagnoses should be considered for Mr. M. is presented. There are major inaccuracies. Rationale and evidence for the diagnoses are lacking.

9.48 points

A general discussion on what primary and secondary medical diagnoses should be considered for Mr. M. is presented. There are some inaccuracies. A summary provides some rationale and evidence to explain why the diagnoses are relevant.

10.68 points

A discussion on what primary and secondary medical diagnoses should be considered for Mr. M. is presented. General rationale and relevant data are used to explain why the diagnoses should be considered. There are minor inaccuracies.

12 points

A detailed discussion on what primary and secondary medical diagnoses should be considered for Mr. M. is presented. Strong rationale and reliable data are used to explain why the diagnoses are relevant and should be considered.

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

0 points

Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

1.8 points

Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.

1.9 points

Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

2.14 points

Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

2.4 points

All format elements are correct.

Explanation of Expected Abnormalities During Nursing Assessment

Explanation of Expected Abnormalities During Nursing Assessment

0 points

A discussion of what abnormalities a nurse would expect to find during a nursing assessment is omitted; or, the expected findings are not relevant for the patient or his health status.

13.5 points

An incomplete summary of some abnormalities a nurse would expect to find during a nursing assessment is presented. There are inaccuracies. No rationale or evidence is provided for support.

14.22 points

A general discussion on the abnormalities a nurse would expect to find during a nursing assessment is presented. There are minor inaccuracies. Some rationale or evidence is provided for support.

16.02 points

A discussion of abnormalities a nurse would expect to find during a nursing assessment is presented. General rationale and evidence are provided for support.

18 points

A thorough discussion of abnormalities a nurse would expect to find during a nursing assessment is presented. Strong rationale and evidence are provided for support.

Clinical Manifestations of Mr. M.

Clinical Manifestations of Mr. M.

0 points

Clinical manifestations are omitted.

9 points

Clinical manifestations are partially presented. There are major omissions and inaccuracies.

9.48 points

Clinical manifestations are summarized. An overview of the general symptoms is presented. Some findings are incomplete.

10.68 points

Subjective and objective clinical manifestations are described. Overall, the clinical manifestations are accurate and reflect observed and perceived signs and symptoms.

12 points

Subjective and objective clinical manifestations are detailed. The clinical manifestations are accurate and clearly report the observed and perceived signs and symptoms.

Interventions for Support

Interventions for Support

0 points

Interventions that can be put into place to support Mr. M. and his family are omitted.

13.5 points

Some interventions that can be put into place to support Mr. M. and his family are partially presented. More information is required.

14.22 points

Some interventions that can be put into place to support Mr. M. and his family are summarized. There are minor inaccuracies.

16.02 points

Key interventions that can be put into place to support Mr. M. and his family are discussed. Some detail is needed for clarity.

18 points

All relevant interventions that can be put into place to support Mr. M. and his family are thoroughly discussed.

Similar Posts