Assignment: NURS 3151C Research Methods

Assignment: NURS 3151C Research Methods

Assignment: Application:

Methods Used in Quantitative Research

As you have explored this week, there are various methods a
researcher may use to engage in quantitative research design. While the methods
presented this week are not exhaustive, they do introduce numerous features
that you will likely encounter when reviewing, accessing, and researching the
nursing practice literature. Whether you are creating new research or searching
the literature to add support for a research question you are interested in,
understanding the quantitative research designs that may be used for nursing
practice will likely inform how you will conduct research for your health care
setting. As you continue to build upon your research skills as a nursing
researcher and professional, understanding how to engage in quantitative
research design is a valuable asset.

For this Assignment, view this week’s Quantitative Research
Designs PowerPoint webinar and pay close attention to its content on the basic
elements of research methods (e.g., sample, data collection, measurement,
analysis). Then, be sure to review the two research studies by Sand-Jekline and
Sherman (2014) and Steelman, Graling, and Perkhounkova (2013), included in this
week’s resources.

Note: While not a required resource, you might find the
definitions in the Encyclopedia of Nursing Research helpful for this
assignment.

This assignment involves identifying and describing the
strengths and weaknesses of the research method used in the Sand-Jecklin and
Sherman (2014) research article in this week’s resources.

· Focus on the
research design, sample data collection methods, tools used for data
collection, and the plan for data analysis as discussed in the Sand-Jecklin and
Sherman (2014) article.

· Identify at
least two strengths and two weaknesses of the study based on reliability and
validity by including additional support with citations from resources not
assigned this week.

· Use the copy
of the Journal Club Template for Quantitative Research located in this week’s
resources. The template includes an area for each element discussed in the
study.

ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT: Assignment: NURS 3151C Research Methods

· Be brief,
paraphrase and summarize each of the elements clearly on the form.

· Provide the
full citation of the article used for this Assignment on the template.

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Name: NURS_3150_Week_3_Assignment_Rubric

· Grid View

· List View

Excellent

Proficient

Basic

Needs Improvement

Research Design

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

Student provided a fully developed explanation of the
research design with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

12 (12%) – 13 (13%)

Student provided a developed discussion of the research
design with reasonable analysis of concepts and related issues.

11 (11%) – 11 (11%)

Student provided a minimally-developed discussion of the
research design with limited analysis of concepts and related issues.

0 (0%) – 10 (10%)

Student provided a under-developed discussion of the
research design with little or no analysis of concepts and related issues.

Sample Selection

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

Student provided a fully developed explanation of the sample
selection with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

12 (12%) – 13 (13%)

Student provided a developed explanation of the sample
selection with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

11 (11%) – 11 (11%)

Student provided a minimally developed explanation of the
sample selection with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

0 (0%) – 10 (10%)

Student provided an under developed explanation of the
sample selection with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

Data Collection Methods, Measures & Tools

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

Student provided a fully developed explanation of the data
collection methods, measures and tools with insightful analysis of concepts and
related issues.

12 (12%) – 13 (13%)

Student provided a developed explanation of the data
collection methods, measures and tools with insightful analysis of concepts and
related issues.

11 (11%) – 11 (11%)

Student provided a minimally developed explanation of the
data collection methods, measures, and tools with insightful analysis of
concepts and related issues.

0 (0%) – 10 (10%)

Student provided an under developed explanation of the data
collection methods, measures and tools with insightful analysis of concepts and
related issues.

Plan for Data Analysis

14 (14%) – 15 (15%)

Student provided a fully developed explanation of the plan
for data analysis with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

12 (12%) – 13 (13%)

Student provided a developed explanation of the plan for
data analysis with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

11 (11%) – 11 (11%)

Student provided a minimally developed explanation of the
plan for data analysis with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

0 (0%) – 10 (10%)

Student provided a under developed explanation of the plan
for data analysis with insightful analysis of concepts and related issues.

Identifies and describes the strengths and weaknesses of the
research method used. You should have at least 2 strengths and two weakness
based on reliability and validity and supported with a citation for each.
(Review AWE 3000 writing expectations, paraphrasing, summarizing and scholarly
writing.)

23 (23%) – 25 (25%)

Student provided a fully developed discussion of at least
two strengths and two weaknesses of the research methods based on the
reliability and validity and supported with a citation for each with insightful
analysis of concepts and related issues.

20 (20%) – 22 (22%)

Student provided a developed discussion of at least two
strengths and two weaknesses of the research methods based on the reliability
and validity and supported with a citation for each with insightful analysis of
concepts and related issues.

18 (18%) – 19 (19%)

Student provided a minimally developed discussion of at
least two strengths and two weaknesses of the research methods based on the
reliability and validity and supported with a citation for each with insightful
analysis of concepts and related issues.

0 (0%) – 17 (17%)

Student provided an under developed discussion of at least
two strengths and two weaknesses of the research methods based on the
reliability and validity and supported with a citation for each with insightful
analysis of concepts and related issues.

Academic Writing Expectations (AWE 2) 2000/3000 Level

9 (9%) – 10 (10%)

Demonstrates fully developed sentence, paragraph, and essay
level skills. Uses evidence from multiple sources to support content. Meets the
3000 AWE level with no writing issues and exceeds the minimum reference
requirement.

8 (8%) – 8 (8%)

Demonstrates developed sentence, paragraph, and essay level
skills. Uses evidence from most sources to support content. Meets the 3000 AWE
level with minimal writing issues and exceeds the minimum reference
requirement.

7 (7%) – 7 (7%)

Demonstrates minimally developed sentence, paragraph, and
essay level skills. Uses evidence from some sources to support content.
Minimally meets the 3000 AWE level with several writing issues and meets the
minimum reference requirement.

0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

Demonstrates limited sentence, paragraph, and essay level
skills. Has limited use of evidence with few or no sources to support the
content. Does not meet the 3000 AWE level of writing and does not meet the
minimum reference requirement.

APA Formatting: cover page, title of paper on second page,
level headings, Times New Roman 12 font, 1″ margins, and page numbers. APA
References: Uses in-text citations appropriately and format correctly.
Paraphrases to avoid plagiarizing the source.

5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Demonstrates fully developed APA formatting with no errors.

4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Demonstrates developed APA formatting with minimal
formatting errors.

3 (3%) – 3 (3%)

Demonstrates minimally developed APA formatting with several
formatting errors.

0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Demonstrates limited APA formatting with multiple formatting
errors.

Total Points: 100