Assignment: Nursing Roles Graphic Organizer Template

Assignment: Nursing Roles Graphic Organizer Template

Assignment: Nursing Roles Graphic Organizer Template

ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT: Assignment: Nursing Roles Graphic Organizer Template

Question Description

Can you help me understand this Health & Medical question?

Nursing Roles Graphic Organizer Template NUR 513 Week 2
Nursing Roles Graphic Organizer Template – Advanced registered nurses work in highly collaborative environments and must collaborate with interdisciplinary teams in order to provide excellent patient care. Besides knowing the role and scope of one’s own practice, it is essential to understand the role and scope of other nurse specialties to ensure effective collaboration among nurses, the organization, and other professionals with whom advanced registered nurses regularly interact.

Use the “Nursing Roles Graphic Organizer Template” to differentiate how advanced registered nurse roles relate to and collaborate with different areas of nursing practice. Compare your future role with one of the following: nurse educator; nurse leader; family nurse practitioner; acute care nurse practitioner; graduate nurse with an emphasis/specialty in public health, health care administration, business, or informatics; clinical nurse specialist; doctor of nursing practice. Indicate in the appropriate columns on the template which roles you are comparing.

Make sure to compare the following areas of practice in your graphic organizer:

Ethics
Education
Leadership
Public Health
Health Care Administration
Informatics
Business/Finance
Specialty (e.g., Family, Acute Care)
Include any regulatory bodies or certification agencies that provide guidance or parameters on how these roles incorporate concepts into practice.

You are required to cite three to five sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Click ‘New Attempt’ to start assignment or attach documents

The two advance practice registered nurse (APRN) roles I will be comparing is the nurse educator and the nurse practitioner. A nurse educator is an APRN who teaches other nurses and they most often work in nursing schools or teach in hospitals (Liaison International, 2022). On the other hand, a nurse practitioner is a licensed clinician that is able to educate, diagnose, prescribe medications to treat, and manage diseases.

Despite differences in roles and responsibilities, all nurses must follow professional ethical guidelines. The code of ethics for nurses was established by the American Nurses Association (ANA) and ensures that nurses provide considerate and dignified care to all (American Nurses Association, n.d.). While all nurses follow the same code/guideline for ethics, different specialties encounter different ethical dilemmas or respond in separate manners. For example, both the nurse educator and nurse practitioner must maintain the ethic principle of autonomy, which includes informed consent. Informed consent is the moral right for people to decide to accept or refuse treatments after knowing all of the risks and benefits (Milliken et al., 2021).

For nurse practitioners, informed consent is a big part of their job because they must make sure they have informed consent from their patients to treat diseases via medication, a procedure, etc. Sometimes patients are not able to provide consent because they do not have a decision-making capacity due to severe illness or impairment. Nurse practitioners would have to deal with the ethical dilemma of getting consent by finding patients’ advance directives or a medical power of attorney. By comparison, a nurse educator does not have to directly deal with informed consent as much because they are mainly educating other nurses and not prescribing medications to/treating patients. However, a nurse educator does have to have a good understanding of the ethical principle of autonomy and the ethical dilemmas that can occur with informed consent because they need to be able to teach their students about it. This ensures that future nurses will uphold the ethics surrounding informed consent.

sing Roles Graphic Organizer

1

Unsatisfactory

0.00%

2

Less than Satisfactory

80.00%

3

Satisfactory

88.00%

4

Good

92.00%

5

Excellent

100.00%

100.0 %Nursing Roles Graphic Organizer Criteria

10.0 %Comparison of Roles in Relation to Ethics

A comparison of roles in relation to ethics is not included.

A comparison of roles in relation to ethics is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.

A comparison of roles in relation to ethics is present.

A comparison of roles in relation to ethics is clearly provided and well developed.

A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to ethics is thoroughly developed with supporting details.

10.0 %Comparison of Roles in Relation to Education

A comparison of roles in relation to education is not included.

A comparison of roles in relation to education is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.

A comparison of roles in relation to education is present.

A comparison of roles in relation to education is clearly provided and well developed.

A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to education is thoroughly developed with supporting details.

10.0 %Comparison of Roles in Relation to Leadership

A comparison of roles in relation to leadership is not included.

A comparison of roles in relation to leadership is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.

A comparison of roles in relation to leadership is present.

A comparison of roles in relation to leadership is clearly provided and well developed.

A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to leadership is thoroughly developed with supporting details.

10.0 %Comparison of Roles in Relation to Public Health

A comparison of roles in relation to public health is not included.

A comparison of roles in relation to public health is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.

A comparison of roles in relation to public health is present.

A comparison of roles in relation to public health is clearly provided and well developed.

A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to public health is thoroughly developed with supporting details.

10.0 %Comparison Roles in Relation to Health Care Administration

A comparison of roles in relation to health care administration is not included.

A comparison of roles in relation to health care administration is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.

A comparison of roles in relation to health care administration is present.

A comparison of roles in relation to health care administration is clearly provided and well developed.

A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to health care administration is thoroughly developed with supporting details.

10.0 %Comparison of Roles in Relation to Informatics

A comparison of roles in relation to informatics is not included.

A comparison of roles in relation to informatics is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.

A comparison of roles in relation to informatics is present.

A comparison of roles in relation to informatics is clearly provided and well developed.

A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to informatics is thoroughly developed with supporting details.

10.0 %Comparison of Roles in Relation to Business or Finance

A comparison of roles in relation to business or finance is not included.

A comparison of roles in relation to business or finance is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.

A comparison of roles in relation to business or finance is present.

A comparison of roles in relation to business or finance is clearly provided and well developed.

A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to business or finance is thoroughly developed with supporting details.

5.0 %Comparison of Roles in Relation to Specialty

A comparison of roles in relation to specialty is not included.

A comparison of roles in relation to specialty is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete.

A comparison of roles in relation to specialty is present.

A comparison of roles in relation to specialty is clearly provided and well developed.

A comprehensive comparison of roles in relation to specialty is thoroughly developed with supporting details.

5.0 %Required Sources

Sources are not included.

Number of required sources is only partially met.

Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate.

Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all

sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

5.0 %Visual Appeal

There are few or no graphic elements. No variation in layout or typography is evident.

Color is garish or typographic variations are overused and

legibility suffers. Background interferes with readability.

Understanding of concepts, ideas, and relationships is limited.

Minimal use of graphic elements is evident. Elements do not

consistently contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and

relationships. There is some variation in type size, color, and layout.

Thematic graphic elements are used but not always in context. Visual

connections mostly contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas,

and relationships. Differences in type size and color are used well and

consistently.

Appropriate and thematic graphic elements are used to make visual

connections that contribute to the understanding of concepts, ideas, and

relationships. Differences in type size and color are used well and

consistently.

5.0 %Presentation

The piece is not neat or organized, and it does not include all required elements.

The work is not neat and includes minor flaws or omissions of required elements.

The overall appearance is general, and major elements are missing.

The overall appearance is generally neat, with a few minor flaws or missing elements.

The work is well presented and includes all required elements. The overall appearance is neat and professional.

5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use)

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication

of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is

employed.

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.

Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are

present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly

distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and

audience-appropriate language are employed.

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be

present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and

figures of speech.

The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

5.0 %Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

Sources are not documented.

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

100 %Total Weightage

You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.

Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.

Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.

The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.
Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.
One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.
I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.
In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.
Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).
Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).
Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.
I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.

Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.
As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.
It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.