Capella FPX4010 Assessment 4: Stakeholder Presentation Assignment

Capella FPX4010 Assessment 4: Stakeholder Presentation Assignment

  • The purpose of this presentation is to introduce a comprehensive plan proposal aimed at improving Interprofessional collaboration in the healthcare industry. The primary focus of the proposal is to enhance the collaboration between healthcare professionals of different disciplines, with a goal of delivering high-quality patient care.
  • The proposal outlines specific and measurable objectives that outline the methods for achieving the goal of improved patient care through enhanced Interprofessional collaboration. It takes into consideration the various challenges faced by the healthcare team in their daily work and provides practical solutions to overcome these challenges.
  • The key stakeholders or leadership groups involved in the implementation of the plan proposal are healthcare professionals from different disciplines, including but not limited to, doctors, nurses, physical therapists, and others. The plan proposes a unified approach to healthcare delivery, where professionals from different backgrounds work together towards the common goal of delivering high-quality patient care.
  • Interprofessional collaboration is a critical aspect of providing high-quality patient care in the healthcare industry. It involves individuals from different professions and disciplines working together with a common goal of improving the well-being of the patient. This type of collaboration allows healthcare professionals to share their unique knowledge and expertise, improve communication, and coordinate care.
  • However, despite its many benefits, there are also challenges that come with interprofessional collaboration in healthcare. One major challenge is communication barriers, as healthcare professionals from different disciplines may have different communication styles, languages, and practices. Another challenge is the lack of trust and understanding among team members, as it can be difficult to build relationships and foster collaboration when team members come from different backgrounds and have different perspectives. Additionally, conflicting schedules and responsibilities among team members can also make it difficult to coordinate care effectively.
  • Despite these challenges, interprofessional collaboration is essential for improving patient outcomes, and it is important for healthcare organizations to prioritize this type of collaboration in their operations. By doing so, they can ensure that they are providing the highest quality care to their patients, and they can help to build a more collaborative and effective healthcare system.
  • John’s case highlights the importance of interprofessional collaboration in healthcare. In order to provide the best care for John, each member of the healthcare team must work together and share their knowledge and expertise. Effective communication and coordination among the team members will ensure that John’s care plan is comprehensive, effective, and tailored to his specific needs.
  • However, coordinating care and communication among a multi-disciplinary healthcare team can be a challenge. Different professionals may have different schedules and responsibilities, which can lead to conflicting priorities and miscommunication. Additionally, there may be communication barriers such as language differences, lack of trust and understanding among team members, and different working styles and approaches.
  • Despite these challenges, interprofessional collaboration is crucial in ensuring that patients like John receive the best possible care. By working together, healthcare professionals can provide a comprehensive and patient-centered approach, which can lead to better health outcomes, improved patient satisfaction, and reduced healthcare costs.
  • The development of clear and specific goals helps to establish a shared understanding among healthcare professionals, which is crucial for effective interprofessional collaboration. When all stakeholders have a common understanding of what is expected, they can work together more efficiently and effectively towards the desired outcome. In this case, the goal is to improve patient outcomes.
  • In healthcare, clear goals provide direction and focus to the efforts of the healthcare team. By having a shared understanding of what is expected, healthcare professionals can coordinate their efforts to achieve the best possible outcome for the patient. The end result is that the patient receives the best possible care, which can lead to better health outcomes and improved quality of life.
  • Having clear goals also ensures that the healthcare team is fully aligned and working towards the same objective. This can reduce the potential for misunderstandings and conflict among team members, which can be a common challenge in interprofessional collaboration. By working together towards a common goal, the healthcare team can overcome barriers to effective collaboration and provide the best possible care to patients.

Capella FPX4010 Assessment 4: Stakeholder Presentation Assignment

For this assessment you will create an 8-12 slide PowerPoint presentation for one or more stakeholder or leadership groups to generate interest and buy-in for the plan proposal you developed for the third assessment.

As a current or future nurse leader, you may be called upon to present to stakeholders and leadership about projects that you have been involved in or wish to implement. The ability to communicate a plan—and potential implications of not pursuing such a plan—to stakeholders effectively can be critically important in creating awareness and buy-in, as well as building your personal and professional brand in your organization. It is equally important that you know how to create compelling presentations for others’ delivery and ensure that they convey the same content you would deliver if you were the presenter.

Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on Capella FPX4010 Assessment 4: Stakeholder Presentation Assignment  completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW

ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER: Capella FPX4010 Assessment 4: Stakeholder Presentation Assignment

Demonstration of Proficiency: Capella FPX4010 Assessment 4 Assignment

Competency 1: Explain strategies for managing human and financial resources to promote organizational health.
Explain how the interdisciplinary plan could be implemented and how the human and financial resources would be managed.
Competency 2: Explain how interdisciplinary collaboration can be used to achieve desired patient and systems outcomes.
Explain an organizational or patient issue for which a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help achieve a specific improvement goal.
Competency 3: Describe ways to incorporate evidence-based practice within an interdisciplinary team.
Summarize an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to address an organizational or patient issue.
Propose evidence-based criteria that could be used to evaluate the degree to which the project was successful in achieving the improvement goal.
Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly, evidence-based communication strategies to impact patient, interdisciplinary team, and systems outcomes.
Communicate the PowerPoint presentation of the interdisciplinary improvement plan to stakeholders in a professional, respectful manner, with writing that is clear, logically organized, with correct grammar and spelling, using current APA style.

Professional Context

This assessment will provide you with an opportunity to sharpen your ability to create a professional

online nursing essays

Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on Capella FPX4010 Assessment 4: Stakeholder Presentation Assignment done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

capella fpx4010 assessment 4 stakeholder presentation assignment
Capella FPX4010 Assessment 4 Stakeholder Presentation Assignment

presentation to stakeholders. In this presentation, you will explain the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle and how it can be used to introduce the plan (P), implement the plan (D), study the effectiveness of the plan (S), and act on what is learned (A) to drive continuous improvement. By using this cycle, the stakeholders will have a tool and a proposal to expand on these ideas to drive workplace change and create improved processes to solve an interprofessional collaboration problem.

Scenario

In addition to summarizing the key points of Assessments 2 and 3, you will provide stakeholders and/or leadership with an overview of project specifics as well as how success would be evaluated—you will essentially be presenting a discussion of the Plan, Do, and Study parts of the PDSA cycle. Again, you will not be expected to execute the project, so you will not have any results to study. However, by carefully examining the ways in which your plan could be carried out and evaluated, you will get some of the experience of the thinking required for PDSA. Capella FPX4010 Assessment 4 Assignment

When creating your PowerPoint for this assessment, it is important to keep in mind the target audience: your interviewee’s organizational leadership. The overall goal of this assessment is to create a presentation that your interviewee could potentially give in his or her organization.

Instructions

Please follow the Capella Guidelines for Effective PowerPoint Presentations [PPTX]. If you need technical information on using PowerPoint, refer to Capella University Library: PowerPoint Presentations.

Be sure that your plan addresses the following, which corresponds to the grading criteria in the scoring guide. Please study the scoring guide carefully so you understand what is needed for a distinguished score.

Explain an organizational or patient issue for which a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help achieve a specific improvement goal.
Summarize an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to address an organizational or patient issue.
Explain how the interdisciplinary plan could be implemented and how the human and financial resources would be managed.
Propose evidence-based criteria that could be used to evaluate the degree to which the project was successful in achieving the improvement goal.
Communicate the PowerPoint presentation of the interdisciplinary improvement plan to stakeholders in a professional manner, with writing that is clear, logically organized, and respectful with correct grammar and spelling using current APA style.

There are various ways to structure your presentation; following is one example:

Part 1: Organizational or Patient Issue.
What is the issue that you are trying to solve or improve?
Why should the audience care about solving it?

The selected organizational issue is catheter-associated urinary tract infections. An interview performed with a nurse manager of a medical ward revealed that the rate of catheter-associated urinary tract infections have been rising over the last quarter in both the medical and surgical floors. The recent statistics showed that the rate was higher than the benchmark data for the hospital. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections are part of hospital acquired infections that threaten the safety, quality, and efficiency of patient care. Therefore, unlike other problems identified from the interview, catheter-associated urinary tract infections have the potentials of causing unintended harms to the patients. In addition, nurses and other healthcare providers should implement interventions to prevent it, since it is associated with hospital interventions, hence, its selection for the project.

Catheter-associated urinary tract infections are significant to the practice site because of several factors. First, catheter-associated urinary tract infections threaten the safety, quality, and efficiency of care that the organization offers to its patients. A further rise in rates is likely to affect the reimbursement the hospital receives since catheter-associated urinary tract infections are safety and quality indicators that influence reimbursement for hospitals. The rates of catheter-associated urinary tract infections have also risen, translating into the need for a responsive intervention. The rate of catheter-associated urinary tract infections is also high in the USA. Accordingly, statistics shows that they contribute up to 1 million cases annually in the USA. In addition, the costs that the country incurs in treating catheter-associated urinary tract infections ranges between $115 million and $1.82 billion annually. Catheter-associated urinary tract infections also contribute to increased hospital costs and stays for the patients. The increase in costs is attributed to the additional care needed to treat and prevent its associated complications (Letica-Kriegel et al., 2019). The hospital stays arises from the fact that patients may develop complications such as septicemia, which demand complex management. Prolonged hospitalization also decreases patients’ productivity and quality of life. For example, complications such as septicemia may cause additional organ damage, leading a decline in one’s quality of life and increased disease burden (Atkins et al., 2020). Therefore, interventions to prevent, minimize, and prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections are essential.

Part 2: Relevance of an Interdisciplinary Team Approach.
Why is using an interdisciplinary team relevant, or the best approach, to addressing the issue?
How will it help to achieve improved outcomes or reach a goal?
Part 3: Interdisciplinary Plan Summary.
What is the objective?
How likely is it to work?
What will the interdisciplinary team do?
Part 4: Implementation and Resource Management.
How could the plan be implemented to ensure effective use of resources?
How could the plan be managed to ensure that resources were not wasted?
How does the plan justify the resource expenditure?
Part 5: Evaluation.
What would a successful outcome of the project look like?
What are the criteria that could be used to measure that success?
How could this be used to show the degree of success?

Again, keep in mind that your audience for this presentation is a specific group (or groups) at your interviewee’s organization and tailor your language and messaging accordingly. Remember, also, that another person will ultimately be giving the presentation. Include thorough speaker’s notes that flesh out the bullet points on each slide. Capella FPX4010 Assessment 4 Assignment

Additional Requirements: Capella FPX4010 Assessment 4 Assignment

Number of slides:Plan on using one or two slides for each part of your presentation as needed, so the content of your presentation will be 8–12 slides in length. Remember that slides should contain concise talking points, and you will use presenter’s notes to go into detail. Be sure to include a reference slide as the last slide of your presentation.
Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your central ideas. Resources should be no more than five years old.
APA formatting: Make sure that in-text citations on your slides and in your notes pages and reference slide reflect current APA Style and Format.

Capella FPX4010 Assessment 4: Stakeholder Presentation Assignment Scoring Guide

CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED
Explain an organizational or patient issue for which a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help achieve a specific improvement goal. Does not describe an organizational or patient issue for which a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help achieve a specific improvement goal. Describes an organizational or patient issue but the way in which a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help achieve a specific improvement goal is unclear or missing. Explains an organizational or patient issue for which a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help achieve a specific improvement goal. Explains an organizational or patient issue for which a collaborative interdisciplinary team approach would help achieve a specific improvement goal, noting potential consequences of not addressing the issue.
Summarize an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to address an organizational or patient issue. Does not summarize an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to address an organizational or patient issue. Discusses an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan, but its relevance to an organizational or patient issue is unclear. Summarizes an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to address an organizational or patient issue. Summarizes an evidence-based interdisciplinary plan to address an organizational or patient issue, noting specific sources of evidence used to develop the plan.
Explain how the interdisciplinary plan could be implemented and how the human and financial resources would be managed. Does not explain how the interdisciplinary plan could be implemented and how the human and financial resources would be managed. Explains how the interdisciplinary plan could be implemented or how the human and financial resources would be managed, but not both. Explains how the interdisciplinary plan could be implemented and how the human and financial resources would be managed. Explains how the interdisciplinary plan could be implemented and how the human and financial resources would be managed, providing real-world examples relevant to the context of the health care organization.
Propose evidence-based criteria to evaluate the degree to which the project was successful in achieving the improvement goal. Does not propose evidence-based criteria to evaluate the degree to which the project was successful in achieving the improvement goal. Proposes irrelevant criteria or criteria not based in evidence to evaluate the degree to which the project was successful in achieving the improvement goal. Proposes evidence-based criteria to evaluate the degree to which the project was successful in achieving the improvement goal. Proposes evidence-based criteria to evaluate the degree to which the project was successful in achieving the improvement goal, noting specific sources of evidence used to develop the criteria.
Slides are easy to read and error free. Detailed speaker notes are provided. Slides are difficult to read with multiple editing errors. No speaker notes provided. Slides are easy to read with few editing errors. Speaker notes are sufficient to support the slides. Slides are easy to read and error free. Detailed speaker notes are provided. Slides are easy to read and clutter free. Slide background is “visually” pleasing with a contrasting color for the text and may utilize graphics. Detailed speaker notes are provided.
Organize content with clear purpose /goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years) with an APA formatted reference list with few errors. Does not organize content with clear purpose/goals. Power point slides do not support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations. Sources are not relevant and/or evidence-based (published within 5 years). No reference list provided. Organizes content with clear purpose/goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years) with a reference list not in APA format/or has many errors in format. Organizes content with clear purpose /goals and with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years) with an APA formatted reference list with few errors. Organizes content with clear purpose/goals. Power point slides support main points, assertions, arguments, conclusions, or recommendations with relevant and evidence-based sources (published within 5 years) with a flawless APA formatted reference list.

Similar Posts