Capella University Strategic HRM and Performance Ethical Dilemma Presentation Discussion

Capella University Strategic HRM and Performance Ethical Dilemma Presentation Discussion

Capella University Strategic HRM and Performance Ethical Dilemma Presentation Discussion

Question Description
Create a six-slide, 12-minute presentation briefing a team on a potential ethical dilemma.

Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on Capella University Strategic HRM and Performance Ethical Dilemma Presentation Discussion  completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW

Imagine management at your future workplace tasks you with making a formal presentation to your team discussing a workplace ethical dilemma they might face. You consider an appropriate professional code of conduct, but only to the extent that it might offer useful guidance in this situation. The central task is to help everyone work together productively in resolving tricky issues.

For this assessment, fulfill the management task and create an audiovisual presentation that applies a professional code of ethics to common workplace situations. Submit your work as a narrated visual presentation in the courseroom submission box. You may develop a series of annotated PowerPoint slides, for example, using Kaltura to record the audio portion of your work. If you are more familiar with other presentation software, you may use that, so long as your submission satisfies all of the required elements of the assessment.

online nursing essays

Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on Capella University Strategic HRM and Performance Ethical Dilemma Presentation Discussion done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

ASSESSMENT INSTRUCTIONS
Include the following in your narrated visual presentation:

Apply a professional code of ethics to this workplace situation.
Assess the advantages and disadvantages of the selected professional code of ethics.
Explain methods for resolving ethical disagreements productively.
Describe areas of one’s personal disagreement with professional standards.
Note: Include in your presentation slides or annotations a full APA-style citation of any quotation or paraphrase from the professional code or other sources you choose to employ.

Your instructor may provide video feedback on your work, in addition to completing the official scoring guide for the assignment.

Submit this assessment to your ePortfolio.

Additional Requirements
Communication: Create an audiovisual presentation that applies a professional code of ethics to common workplace situations.
Media presentation: Create a minimum of 6 slides, 12 minutes total in length, with notes or a transcript to ensure accessibility to everyone. Upload the presentation.
Resources: There is no minimum number of resources required; however, use your judgment to ensure your topic is thoroughly researched.
APA guidelines: Ensure resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and format. When appropriate, use APA-formatted headings.
Font and font size: Use a font of appropriate size and weight for presentation, generally 24–28 points for headings and no smaller than 18 points for bullet-point text.

Ethics in the Workplace Scoring Guide
CRITERIA NON-PERFORMANCE BASIC PROFICIENT DISTINGUISHED
Apply a professional code of ethics to a workplace situation. Does not apply a professional code of ethics to a workplace situation. Explains a workplace situation in the context of a professional code of ethics. Applies a professional code of ethics to a workplace situation. Assesses an appropriate professional code of ethics as applied to a workplace situation.
Assess the advantages and disadvantages of a professional code of ethics. Does not describe the advantages and disadvantages of a professional code of ethics. Describes the advantages or disadvantages of a professional code of ethics, but not both. Assesses the advantages and disadvantages of a professional code of ethics. Analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of a professional code of ethics.
Explain methods for resolving ethical disagreements productively. Does not mention methods for resolving ethical disagreements productively. Mentions methods for resolving ethical disagreements productively. Explains methods for resolving ethical disagreements productively. Assesses methods for resolving ethical disagreements productively.
Describe areas of one’s personal disagreement with professional standards. Does not describe areas of one’s personal disagreement with professional standards. Lists areas of one’s personal disagreement with professional standards. Describes areas of one’s personal disagreement with professional standards. Explains areas of one’s personal disagreement with professional standards.
Create an audio-visual presentation that applies a professional code of ethics to a workplace situation. Does not create an audio-visual presentation that applies a professional code of ethics to a workplace situation. Creates an audio-visual presentation that applies a professional code of ethics, but the presentation lacks detail or does not reflect a workplace situation. Creates an audio-visual presentation that applies a professional code of ethics to a workplace situation. Creates an audio-visual presentation that applies a professional code of ethics to a workplace situations, and the presentation is engaging and detailed.

ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT: Capella University Strategic HRM and Performance Ethical Dilemma Presentation Discussion

 

You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.

Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.

Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.

The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.
Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.
One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.
I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.
Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.
In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.
Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).
Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.
APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).
Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.
I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.
Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.
As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.
It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.
LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.
Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.
Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

 

 

Similar Posts