NR 361 Week 1 Discussion Questions Topic, AACN Essentials Self-Assessment Results
NR 361 Week 1 Discussion Questions Topic, AACN Essentials Self-Assessment Results
NR 361 Week 1 Discussion Questions Topic, AACN Essentials Self-Assessment Results
I’ve been a Registered Nurse for a little over six months, everyday at work I’m learning something new or a quicker way of doing certain things. But I barely found out the role of informatics. “Informatics is an essential component of healthcare today. The Institute of Medicine (2013a) noted its vision for the development of a continuously learning health system in which science, informatics, incentives, and culture are aligned for continuous improvement and innovation, and new knowledge is captured as a by-product of care processes.” (Hebda, Hunter, Czar, 2019)Everyday at work I was implementing informatics and didn’t realize it. In doing the AACN, I have very little knowledge of the field, but reading the assigned chapters gave me another point of view in healthcare. I did not score that high, I received a 22 , but hopefully as the weeks go by in the class, I’ll gain a better understanding of the role in informatics in nursing. Using the iv pumps while medicating a patient, using the electronic health record in documenting and looking up orders, and charting notes all fall under informatics. Hopefully by the end of the eight weeks, I’ll double my scores.
Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NR 361 Week 1 Discussion Questions Topic, AACN Essentials Self-Assessment Results completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW
American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN). (2008). The essentials of baccalaureate education for professional nursing practice. Washington, DC: AACN. Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/education-resources/baccessentials08.pdf/Links to an external site.
Hebda, T., Hunter, K., & Czar, P. (2018). Handbook of informatics for nurses and healthcare professionals. NY, NY: Pearson.
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NR 361 Week 1 Discussion Questions Topic, AACN Essentials Self-Assessment Results done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
I scored a 31 on the AACN Essentials Self-Assessment. I have been a nurse for 4 years, I still consider myself a new nurse because I’ve only worked in one specialty. There are many specialties that I am not familiar with and still learning. My current knowledge base in informatics is information literacy. “Information literacy builds on computer literacy and refers to a user’s ability to identify information needed for a specific purpose, locate pertinent information, evaluate the information, and apply it correctly” (Hebda, Hunter, & Czar, 2019 p. 36). I am able to navigate information systems to find needed information and apply in my nursing care. I am still learning how to communicate the data into knowledge. The area that I need the most improvement is “participating in evaluation of information systems in practice settings through policy and procedure development” (American Association of Colleges of Nursing, 2008 p. 19). In the self-assessment I gave myself a poor in this area because I don’t have any experience related to this. Ways I can improve in this area are taking this course, being more involved with the development of policy and procedure in my agency, and continuing to learn by practicing nursing. “The use of health information technology will foster and support nurses in providing health care and improving its quality” (Samadbeik, Shahrokhi, Saremian, Garavand, & Birjandi, 2017 p. 381). Nursing is a field that is always changing and growing. Nurses are continuously learning to improve their skills and knowledge this will ensure that patients receive the best quality care possible.
References
American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2008). The essentials of baccalaureate education for professional nursing practice. http://www.aacn.nche.edu/education-resources/baccessentials08.pdf/Links to an external site.
Hebda, T., Hunter, K., & Czar, P. (2019). Handbook of informatics for nurses & healthcare professionals (6th ed.). Pearson.
Samadbeik, M., Shahrokhi, N., Saremian, M., Garavand, A., & Birjandi, M. (2017). Information Processing in Nursing Information Systems: An Evaluation Study from a Developing Country. Iranian Journal of Nursing & Midwifery Research, 22(5), 377. https://chamberlainuniversity.idm.oclc.org/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edb&AN=127038106&site=eds-live&scope=siteLinks to an external site.
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||
| Main Posting | 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. Supported by at least three current, credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s). One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Post is cited with two credible sources. Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors. |
0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately. Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Contains only one or no credible sources. Not written clearly or concisely. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
|
| Main Post: Timeliness | 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3. |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3. |
|
| First Response | 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. |
|
| Second Response | 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings. Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth. Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth. Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. |
|
| Participation | 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days. |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days. |
|
| Total Points: 100 | |||||
Thank you for sharing your score and experience. Your plan to increase your involvement with policy and procedure development will undoubtedly provide insights and appreciation for processes that you may not even be imagining right now if you have similar experiences to the ones I have had.