NR 394 Week 4 Assignment: Course Project Part 2: Research

NR 394 Week 4 Assignment: Course Project Part 2: Research 

NR 394 Week 4 Assignment: Course Project Part 2: Research 

Directions: Prior to completing this template, carefully review Week 4: Course Project Part 2 Check-In Directions paying attention to how to name the document and all rubric requirements.

Approved specific/ethnic population _Hispanics

Approved health problem _Obesity and Overweight

1. Explain any revisions, if required, by the Week 3: Course Project Part 1 faculty feedback. If no revisions were needed, state “None.”

None

• Explain your progress on completing the Week 4: Course Project Part 2 assignment.

            Completion of week 4 task is underway. The information is being gathered from various sources such as class notes, academic journals, internet sources, articles, and other authorized academic sources. Getting information from different sources is essential in continual use and enhancement of my skills (Philippakos, 2018). It is critical to have information targeting effective information on obesity and overweight, especially among the Hispanics. Relevant information on the desired topic, which is obesity issue in Hispanic population, is critical in producing positive outcomes for the current project.

            Personally, I enjoy completing assignments. However, I acknowledge that this assignment can be changed or adjusted constantly. Overall, working on week 4 assignment has been both exciting and challenging experience and I look forward for successful completion and submission.

• Ask at least one question of your instructor that could help you do your best on the Week 4: Course Project Part 2 assignment. 

            It is imperative to determine the rationale and goals for any assignment given by the instructor to help in realizing such goals. Therefore, the possible questions that I can as the instructor to help in best performance in week 4 project include the following.

1. What do I hope to gain from completing the assignment? What knowledge, abilities, and skills does the assignment aim to measure?
2. What is the scope of the project? What areas to will you cover in the weekly assignment?

            This last question is concerned with the determination of the levels of the student. Description of the scope of the project is essential in tailoring of the assignment appropriately for the students’ skill levels. Setting assignment beyond the knowledge of students is challenging is frustrating and can demoralize students (Hussain et al., 2018). Knowing the level of students is vital in determining the direction of assignment and the abilities that the assignment seeks to investigate.

References

Hussain, M., Zhu, W., Zhang, W., & Abidi, S. M. R. (2018). Student engagement predictions in an e-learning system and their impact on student course assessment scores. Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6347186

Philippakos, Z. A. (2018). Using a task analysis process for reading and writing assignments. The Reading Teacher, 72(1), 107-114. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1690

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS NR 394 Week 4 Assignment: Course Project Part 2: Research :

Purpose

The purpose of this course project is to apply concepts in transcultural culturally competent nursing throughout the lifespan.

Based on your accepted Course Project Part 1 topic, use the information to demonstrate the skills of the professional nurse as an educator.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 1: Identify theories, concepts, and beliefs related to transcultural nursing. (PO 1)

CO 3: Describe culturally competent nursing care across the lifespan. (PO 4)

Project Overview

1. There are three parts to the project.
2. There will be graded Project Check-ins that correlate to each part.
3. The topic selected in Part 1 will be the same one used in parts 2 and 3.
4. Review the table below for overview and due dates with each topic.
5. Carefully review the instructions, templates, and rubrics for each of the three parts as you begin this Course Project.
6. Contact your instructor with questions.

Overview	Points	Due Date
Part 1 completed in Week 3
Part 2: Check-In	50	Wednesday of Week 4
Part 2: Researching Your Topic	200	Sunday end of Week 4
Part 3: Check-In	50	Wednesday of Week 6
Part 3: Topic Poster	200	Sunday end of Week 6
Discussion of Topics	100	Two posts (answer post and reply post) on two different days by Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 7

Due Date

Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 4

Points Possible

200 Points

Late Policy

If the assignment is not submitted by due date, a late deduction will be applied. See rubric.

Directions

• Download the required Week 4: Course Project Part 2 Template below.
• Save it to your computer with the file name: Your Last Name NR394 Course Project Part 2.docx
• View the Course Project Part 2 tutorial. (Click here to view)Links to an external site.
• Use instructor feedback from Week 4: Course Project Part 2 Check-In to improve this assignment.
• Do not stereotype a cultural/ethnic group. Stereotyping will result in point deduction. See rubric. 
• Address the questions on the provided template:
  • Description of Issue, Indicator, and Focus
    • Describe approved transcultural nursing issue from Course Project
    • Describe approved Healthy People 2030 Leading Health Indicator
    • Describe approved cultural focus
  • References with Permalink
    • Provide APA references for two peer-reviewed scholarly professional journal articles related to your nursing issue, cultural focus and/or health indicator.
      • Articles must be published within the last five (5) years. If you are unsure whether the article is appropriate, ask your instructor.
    • Include the permalink to the article.
      • For more information on finding Permalinks in the Chamberlain Library, see Learn the Library and Finding PermalinksLinks to an external site..
  • Summary
    • Summarize the key points from each peer-reviewed scholarly professional nursing journal articles selected in one or two paragraphs. Be clear and concise.
  • Educational Plan
    • Imagine you are educating a group of fellow nurses.
    • Clearly describe what key points would you share with them?
    • What would you suggest as best practices?
    • What ethical issues or conflict of care could potentially exist?
• Please reach out to your instructor with any questions or concerns.

Template

Week 4: Course Project Part 2 Template (Download here)Links to an external site.

Best Practices

• Please use your browser’s File setting to save or print this page.
• Use the template provided. If the template is not used, a deduction will be applied. See rubric below.
• Spell check for spelling and grammar errors prior to final submission.
• Use the rubric as a final check prior to submission to ensure all content is clearly addressed

Scholarly Source and Citations

• Scholarly sources are required
• Cite all sources in APA format

**Academic Integrity**

Chamberlain College of Nursing values honesty and integrity. All students should be aware of the Academic Integrity policy and follow it in all discussions and assignments.

By submitting this assignment, I pledge on my honor that all content contained is my own original work except as quoted and cited appropriately. I have not received any unauthorized assistance on this assignment.

Rubric

NR394 – Course Project Part 2 Research

Criteria	Ratings	Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStatement of Issue, Indicator, and FocusClearly describes the following: 1. approved transcultural nursing issue; 2. approved Healthy People 2030 Leading Health Indicator; 3. approved cultural focus	25 ptsAll criteria met.Clearly describes the following: 1. approved transcultural nursing issue; 2. approved Healthy People 2030 Leading Health Indicator; 3. approved cultural focus22 ptsAll criteria are met. Description is not clear.20 ptsOne criterion is missing10 ptsTwo criteria are missing0 ptsAll criteria are missing.	25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences1. Includes two peer-reviewed scholarly professional journal articles 2. Articles are related to the approved topic. 3. Articles are published within the last five (5) years. 4. References are listed in APA format, including a permalink.	25 ptsAll criteria met.1. Includes two peer-reviewed scholarly professional journal articles 2. Articles are related to the approved topic. 3. Articles are published within the last five (5) years. 4. References are listed in APA format, including a permalink.22 ptsOne criterion is missing.20 ptsTwo criteria are missing.10 ptsThree criteria are missing.0 ptsAll criteria are missing.	25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSummary1. Summarizes the two peer-reviewed scholarly professional journal articles selected 2. Summary is 1-2 paragraphs for each article. 3. Summary is detailed and clear but concise. 4. Addresses key points of articles	75 ptsAll criteria met.1.Summarizes the two peer-reviewed scholarly professional journal articles selected 2.Summary is 1-2 paragraphs for each article. 3.Summary is detailed and clear but concise. 4.Addresses key points of articles66 ptsOne criterion is missing.60 ptsTwo criteria are missing.29 ptsThree criteria are missing.0 ptsAll criteria are missing.	75 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEducational PlanClearly describes in detail: 1. Key points for educational program; 2. Suggestions for best practice; 3. Ethical issues or conflict of care that could potentially exist.	50 ptsAll criteria are met.Clearly describes in detail: 1.Key points for educational program. 2.Suggestions for best practice. 3.Ethical issues or conflict of care that could potentially exist.44 ptsAll criteria are met. Description is not clear.40 ptsOne criterion is missing19 ptsTwo criteria are missing0 ptsAll criteria are missing.	50 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProfessionalism1. Excellent writing mechanics (no grammar, punctuation, and spelling errors) 2. No stereotyping	25 ptsAll criteria met.Excellent writing mechanics (no grammar, punctuation, and spelling errors) AND no stereotyping22 ptsGood writing mechanics (few grammar, punctuation, and spelling errors) AND no stereotyping20 ptsFair writing mechanics (some grammar, punctuation, and spelling errors) AND no stereotyping10 ptsPoor writing mechanics (many grammar, punctuation, and spelling errors)OR stereotyping present in paper0 ptsVery poor mechanics such that assignment is difficult to read AND stereotyping present in paper	25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCorrect Topic and Correct Template Use	0 ptsNo points deducted0 points deducted Correct topic and correct template used for the assignment0 ptsPoints deducted – 20 points deducted (10%)Incorrect topic OR incorrect/no template used results in a 20-point deduction (10%).	0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSubmitted on time	0 ptsNo points deductedSubmitted on time0 ptsNot Submitted on Time – Points Deducted (5% deduction per day)1 day late = 10 Deduction; 2 day late = 20 Deduction; 3 day late = 30 Deduction; 4 day late = 40 Deduction; 5 day late = 50 Deduction; 6 day late = 60 Deduction; 7 day late = 70 Deduction; Score of 0 if more than 7 days late