NR 501 Week 3 Discussion Steps of Concept Analysis

ByAtlas Essays

NR 501 Week 3 Discussion Steps of Concept Analysis

NR 501 Week 3 Discussion Steps of Concept Analysis

The World Health Organization (WHO) defines Quality of life (QoL) as a person’s view of their situation in life in the perspective of the culture and value systems where they live, and with regard to their expectations, goals, standards, and concerns (Sarwar et al., 2019). It is the physical and mental health that a person perceives over time. QoL is further defined as how a person is healthy, comfortable, and able to engage in or take pleasure in life events. The term QoL is innately ambiguous since it can refer to an individual’s experience of their life and the living conditions in which people find themselves (Sarwar et al., 2019). The purpose of this assignment is to describe the defining attributes of QoL, the antecedent and consequence, create a model case, and theoretically apply the concept.

Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on NR 501 Week 3 Discussion Steps of Concept Analysis  completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW

Do My Paper

Three Defining Attributes

The three defining attributes of QoL are: A feeling of satisfaction with one’s life generally; A satisfactory state of physical, emotional, social, and mental health as established by the person referred to; The mental ability to establish one’s own life as satisfactory (Van Leeuwen et al., 2019). For example, for a person to say they have a good QoL, they need to be satisfied with their overall life. Besides, they should be satisfied with their physical, emotional, social, and mental health. They should be satisfied with their body’s physiological performance to have balance and harmony with themselves and others. They should also have a positive self-esteem and body image and positive and productive social interactions, personal relationships, and social support (Van Leeuwen et al., 2019). Lastly, a person with a good QoL exhibits the mental ability to assess their life as satisfactory.

 Antecedent and Consequence of The Concept

An antecedent is not necessarily a causative factor, but it is important for the concept to occur and can contribute to its cause. An antecedent of QoL is an individual’s ability to make a decision (Haraldstad et al., 2019). An individual may feel that it is important to get on with life. However, the decision often depends on the limitations their QoL imposes, such as physical activity and socialization levels. Individuals evaluate their lives and make decisions, which can sometimes improve or worsen their QoL (Haraldstad et al., 2019). On the other hand, consequences refer to factors that follow the occurrence. A consequence of QoL is acceptance of one’s circumstances. The results of a positive QoL are coping, adaptation, and satisfaction with life (Haraldstad et al., 2019). However, the results of a negative QoL are a lack of satisfaction and risk-taking behavior beyond that of a person’s age.

nursing masters

Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on NR 501 Week 3 Discussion Steps of Concept Analysis done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

Meet my deadline

Model Case

A model case is an example of the use of a concept that shows all of its defining attributes. The following is a model case for QoL:  A 32-year-old man gets home from work one evening. As he parks his SUV in the parking lot next to his wife’s car, his two children, 5-year-old and 3-year-old, run and scream with joy to welcome him home. He can also see his wife smiling and waving at him at the door. The children hug him and help him carry some snacks he brought for them. When he gets to the house, his wife hugs and welcomes him and offers him a cup of tea. He sits and tells himself, “I have the life I was dreaming of; there is nothing I wish to change.” He reflects on how lucky he is to have a happy family, a successful business, good health, and supportive friends. Many people look upon him and wish their life was a fraction of his.

The model case demonstrates the quality of life. The three defining attributes are presented in the case. The man has an overall sense of happiness and satisfaction with his life. He has the mental ability to evaluate his life. Besides, he feels he is in good health since he can do the things he wishes to. Furthermore, other people also assess her life be of quality.

Theoretical Applications of the Concept

Peplau’s nursing theory applies to the concept of QoL. QoL is entrenched in Peplau’s theory as an indefinable, extensive phenomenon. Peplau considers QoL as a subjective view of the condition of an individual’s life, which is equal to a person’s wellbeing and psychological wellness and often connected with health (Hagerty et al., 2018). A relationship is fundamental in Peplau’s theory, whereas QoL is considered a by-product of the relationship and thus significant to the theory. Peplau proposed that QoL is mostly a subjective perception and varies with changing conditions; (time and situation-dependent) (Hagerty et al., 2018). Nonetheless, QoL is considered an intangible quality in the theory.

Reflection

QoL concept applies to advanced nursing practice (APN) since APRNs must understand that QoL is the degree to which individuals enjoy a good life. Besides, APRNs should understand that a person enjoys a good life when they attain a balance in their relations with themselves and others by creating and maintaining adequate conditions and personal potentials over the life course. QoL, without a doubt, is relevant to APN practice. Patients often consult NP on how to achieve the best possible QoL for themselves or their loved ones. For an NP to help these patients and their families, they must themselves reflect on what is meant by QOL.

NR 501 Week 3 Discussion Steps of Concept Analysis References

Hagerty, T. A., Samuels, W., Norcini-Pala, A., & Gigliotti, E. (2018). Peplau’s Theory of Interpersonal Relations: An Alternate Factor Structure for Patient Experience Data?. Nursing science quarterly, 30(2), 160–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894318417693286

Haraldstad, K., Wahl, A., Andenæs, R., Andersen, J. R., Andersen, M. H., Beisland, E., … & Helseth, S. (2019). A systematic review of quality of life research in medicine and health sciences. Quality of life Research, 28(10), 2641-2650. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-019-02214-9

Sarwar, S., Aleem, A., & Nadeem, M. A. (2019). Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and its correlation with academic performance of medical students. Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 35(1), 266–270. https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.35.1.147

Van Leeuwen, K. M., Van Loon, M. S., Van Nes, F. A., Bosmans, J. E., De Vet, H. C., Ket, J. C., … & Ostelo, R. W. (2019). What does quality of life mean to older adults? A thematic synthesis. PloS one, 14(3), e0213263. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0213263

Thanks for your suggestion on objective tools to measure my empirical referent of health literacy, I think I was a little confused about the context in my post. I was able to review the article you suggested and I will be helpful in my analysis. Additionally, I found an article by Mantwill, Monestel, and Schutz (2015) that suggest that health disparity is the antecedent of health literacy for which very little research has been collected. The article explains that there are many factors that possibly contribute to health disparity such as race, gender, social, economic and environmental disadvantages and there is no clear picture of how it plays a direct role in a patients health literacy. The authors agree that health literacy is definitely affected by health disparities but to what degree, no one can be sure.   Some tools they used in their study of health disparity and health literacy include REALM ( rapid estimate of adult literacy) and S-TOFHLA (short test of functional health literacy) to screen individuals reading ability.

As nurses, we understand that our patient’s ability to read and understand discharge instructions, medication instructions even procedure consent forms are paramount for effective patient education. In order for to properly care for her patient from initial contact until their discharge for her care, we must assess, evaluate and promote improved health literacy at whatever level the patient currently exists.

NR 501 Week 3 Discussion Steps of Concept Analysis References

Mantwill, S., Monestel-Umana, S., & Schulz, P. J. (2015). The Relationship between Health Literacy and Health Disparities: A Systematic Review. Plos One, 10(12), e0145455. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0145455

At the end of Week 3 your concept analysis is due. This discussion provides an opportunity to start this assignment. Select a nursing concept, supported by a nursing theory, and address the following components included in a concept analysis:?

Definition of concept and discussion of concept in the nurse practitioner role?

Identification of three attributes of the concept?

Description of one antecedent and one consequence of the concept?

Identification of two empirical referents?

A brief explanation of theoretical applications of the concept (How is the concept relevant to a nursing theory?)?

This information does not have to be comprehensive but provides a foundation to the upcoming assignment. Be sure to include scholarly references.

Important information for writing discussion questions and participation

Welcome to class

Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires alot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NR 501 Week 3 Discussion Steps of Concept Analysis

I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you.

Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted.

NR 501 Week 3 Discussion Steps of Concept Analysis

If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations.

Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements.

Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week.

I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!

Hi Class,

Please read through the following information on writing a Discussion question response and participation posts.

Contact me if you have any questions.

Important information on Writing a Discussion Question

  • Your response needs to be a minimum of 150 words (not including your list of references)
  • There needs to be at least TWO references with ONE being a peer reviewed professional journal article.
  • Include in-text citations in your response
  • Do not include quotes—instead summarize and paraphrase the information
  • Follow APA-7th edition
  • Points will be deducted if the above is not followed

Participation –replies to your classmates or instructor

  • A minimum of 6 responses per week, on at least 3 days of the week.
  • Each response needs at least ONE reference with citations—best if it is a peer reviewed journal article
  • Each response needs to be at least 75 words in length (does not include your list of references)
  • Responses need to be substantive by bringing information to the discussion or further enhance the discussion. Responses of “I agree” or “great post” does not count for the word count.
  • Follow APA 7th edition
  • Points will be deducted if the above is not followed

Participation for MSN

    The Threaded Discussion Grading Grid and Rubric document can be found in Course Resources.

Participation Guidelines

Due Date: First initial posting to the required threaded discussion topic is due by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT. Peer and instructor responses are due by Sunday 11:59 pm MT. All posts for week 8 are due by the close of class on Wednesday 11:59 pm MT. Please note that the late assignment policy does not apply to the threaded discussions.

Total Points Possible: Varies with course, please see specific course syllabus. These guidelines are for a required threaded discussion worth 50 points. Please note that week 8 will be worth only 25 points.

Requirements:

Description of the Assignment

1. Initial posting: This is defined to be the initial post in which the student responds to the required threaded discussion topic. The first posting by a student within the required discussion area is considered to be the initial posting and will be evaluated using the rubric criteria. Scholarship in communication is expected. Required scholarly source(s) provide specific information that thoroughly address the required topic. For the initial posting, one scholarly source must be presented. The scholarly source must be an outside source. The student may use the required course textbook (s), assigned readings and lesson information in the initial post; however, these are not considered outside scholarly sources.

The initial posting must occur before Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT. Initial postings must be at a minimum of 300 words. References do not apply toward word count. ONLY in Week 8, the initial posting must be a minimum of 200 words with a scholarly reference. It remains due by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT

2. Peer responses: As part of the threaded discussion requirements, the student must provide a substantive response to a peer. Substantive responses pose new ideas, ask questions, and/or generally add to the discussion topic in a meaningful and constructive way.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NR 501 Week 3 Discussion Steps of Concept Analysis

The peer response must occur on a separate day from the initial posting and instructor response (see below). This peer response must occur before Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. This response does not require a scholarly reference unless information is paraphrased and/or direct quotes are used, then APA guidelines apply. Peer responses must be a minimum of 150 words. References do not apply toward word count.

3. Instructor response: The student must respond to an instructor’s follow-up questions. The instructor’s question may be directed to the student or may be a question directed to another student in the section. The response must be comprehensive and scholarly in nature. Instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words. References do not apply toward word count.

The response to the instructor must occur on a day different from the initial post and a day different from the peer response. Responses to the instructor must occur before Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.

4. For week 8 only: Students are expected to post a peer response or an instructor post but are not required to do both. These posts must be a minimum of 100 words. References do not apply toward word count. The peer or instructor response must be on a different day than the initial post and must occur before Wednesday, 11:50 pm MT due to the shorter week.

Posting Requirements:

  1. The initial posting must be provided before Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.
  2. The initial posting must have at least one scholarly outside source that is cited within the posting and referenced. Required course textbooks, assigned readings and lesson information are not considered to be outside scholarly sources.
  3. Initial posting must be a minimum of 300 words; peer responses and instructor responses a minimum 150 words.
  4. The peer responses and instructor responses must be provided before Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.
  5. All postings are substantive and relate to the graded threaded discussion topic.
  6. Only one small quote (15 words or less) within the entire initial posting is accepted.
  7. Postings must occur on 3 separate days.
  8. For week 8 only: the required postings are amended due to the shorter week. Two posts are required. One initial post and either a peer response or an instructor response. Initial post must be a minimum of 200 words and the peer or instructor response must be a minimum of 100 words. Both posts are required to be on two separate days. All posts must be made by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT

Criteria for Content

  • Scholarliness: In this category, the student will conduct a search of the current databases and locate valid, relevant, and reliable information for the required topic. Each reference must be scholarly.
  • Application of Course Knowledge: In this category, the student demonstrates the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge, and information learned in the course lesson and outside readings. This information is then applied to a real-life professional situation as an example.
  • Interactive Dialogue: In this category, the minimum requirements are to provide an initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT of each week. In addition, one peer response and one instructor response are required. These postings must be completed by Sunday, 11:59 pm MT of each week. The initial posting, peer response, and instructor response must be on 3 separate days.
  • Grammar, Syntax, APA: Proper grammar, APA, and syntax is required for all posts. Students should follow the APA Manual 6th Edition. Additional APA information is available in Course Resources.
  • Participation Requirement: One initial posting, one peer response and one instructor response (for a total of 3 posts for the week) are required on 3 separate days.
  • Participation Deadline: The student must provide a substantive response to the graded threaded discussion topic. This must be posted by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT of each week. Peer and instructor responses must be posted by Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.
  • For week 8 only: the required postings are amended due to the shorter week. Two posts are required. One initial post and either a peer response or an instructor response. Initial post must be a minimum of 200 words and the peer or instructor response must be a minimum of 100 words. Both posts are required to be on two separate days. All posts must be made by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.

Criteria for Format and Special Instructions

  1. Instructor reserves the right to submit any threaded discussion posting to TurnItIn in order to verify the originality.
  2. When journals are used as the outside source of information, it is preferred that the journal be peer reviewed. The Chamberlain online librarian is very helpful in assisting you to find an article related to your topic. If you have questions concerning scholarly sources, please refer to the handout entitled “What is a scholarly source” located under “Course Resources” tab.
  3. Web sites vary in quality and scholarship. It is the responsibility of the student to determine the scholarly nature of the web site. If the instructor determines that the site failed to demonstrate scholarship, points maybe deducted. Students are cautioned to use care regarding .com sites. Some .com sites are excellent such as American Heart Association, but others are built by individuals and scholarliness is lacking. It is recommended that you check with your instructor before using a .com website as a reference.
  4. Only one small quote (15 words or less) within the entire initial posting is acceptable. It is expected that the student will paraphrase the information when presenting information from a scholarly source. The scholarly source(s) for the paraphrased information must be cited using APA format. Do not include a number of small quotes even if they are just a few words as your instructor considers a quote to be a quote no matter its limited size.

NR 501 Week 3 Discussion Steps of Concept Analysis Grading Rubric

Performance Category 100% or highest level of performance

100%

16 points

 Very good or high level of performance

88%

14 points

 Acceptable level of performance

81%

13 points

 Inadequate demonstration of expectations

68%

11 points

 Deficient level of performance

56%

9 points

 Failing level

of performance

55% or less

0 points
 Total Points Possible= 50           16 Points    14 Points 13 Points        11 Points           9 Points          0 Points
Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.

Similar Posts