NR 506 Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership

ByAtlas Essays

NR 506 Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership

NR 506 Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership

Coalitions is defined as a congregation of liked minded individuals that come together to address a particular problem or issue to reach a common goal. Leaders are important in all roles however an effective leader is one who is strong minded and goal oriented. Effective leaders possess qualities of strength, empowerment, courage, critical thinking and strong ethical values. Leaders of coalitions keep their team focused and on task. The leaders have to the ability to direct members of their organization. “Leadership is a broad term used to describe an individual’s ability to define a vision within a specific competency; leadership is a complex and multifaceted role” (Pravikoff, 2017).

Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on NR 506 Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership  completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW

Do My Paper

Effective leadership is important to everyday life as well as our careers in nursing. My family consist of 7 people. My husband and I have 5 children. Although we govern our house and rules together, I look at my husband as the leader of our coalition. Our family has goals to be as successful as possible. We work together to ensure our children do well in school in order to be successful in life. As the leader, my husband keeps everyone on task and focused towards a common goal. He applies the knowledge and skill set of organization and critical thinking to our daily routines. Sometimes we filter off task and he bring us back into focus.

Locate a state or national coalition advocating for your approved healthcare policy concern. Who are the coalition partners and is there an identified leader? Can you identify successes indicating strong leadership? What can you add to the content for your upcoming interview from the work of this coalition?

nursing masters

Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on NR 506 Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

Meet my deadline

 In Week 3, we moved from identifying a specific health policy proposal to exploring how to move the proposal forward through the work of coalitions. One of the key goals of coalitions is to change social or public policy. Special-interest coalitions can play a key strategic role in moving legislation forward.  Across the class, leadership of the coalition was identified as a critical factor in coalition effectiveness. Our focus in Week 3 was on the following course outcomes: advocate for institutional, local, national, and international policies that influence healthcare and its consumers and nurses and their nursing practice (PO 2, 10). Developing health policy can be inherently adversarial due to the nature of the process; stakeholders frequently differ on how to solve a health policy problem.  Nurses are experienced in advocating for their patients in an environment of competing priorities; they can successfully transfer those skills to become an effective nurse advocate.   

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS NR 506 Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership: 

Further it is important to remember the need for evidence-informed policy. 

Although we did not discuss evidence-informed policy, the following four reasons are examples of why it is important to use evidence to develop health policy:

  1. Solutions are based on science rather than assumptions;
    1. Solutions are practical;
    1. Solutions are designed to address lessons learned from previous policy options; and
    1. Solutions are perceived by policymakers as being more credible.  

I look forward to reading your priority policy assignment this week.  I hope to have grading done by  no later than Sunday but that could be a challenge given my eye surgery.  When formatting your paper, to prevent forgetting any critical requirements, use the grading rubric to develop your headings. The empirical evidence section can be integrated. Headings are a short phrase describing what the succeeding section is about and facilitate transition from one topic to another.

Participation for MSn

Participation Guidelines

Due Date: First initial posting to the required threaded discussion topic is due by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT. Peer and instructor responses are due by Sunday 11:59 pm MT. All posts for week 8 are due by the close of class on Wednesday 11:59 pm MT. Please note that the late assignment policy does not apply to the threaded discussions.

Total Points Possible: Varies with course, please see specific course syllabus. These guidelines are for a required threaded discussion worth 50 points. Please note that week 8 will be worth only 25 points.

Requirements:

Description of the Assignment

1. Initial posting: This is defined to be the initial post in which the student responds to the required threaded discussion topic. The first posting by a student within the required discussion area is considered to be the initial posting and will be evaluated using the rubric criteria. Scholarship in communication is expected. Required scholarly source(s) provide specific information that thoroughly address the required topic. For the initial posting, one scholarly source must be presented. The scholarly source must be an outside source. The student may use the required course textbook (s), assigned readings and lesson information in the initial post; however, these are not considered outside scholarly sources.

The initial posting must occur before Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT. Initial postings must be at a minimum of 300 words. References do not apply toward word count. ONLY in Week 8, the initial posting must be a minimum of 200 words with a scholarly reference. It remains due by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT

2. Peer responses: As part of the threaded discussion requirements, the student must provide a substantive response to a peer. Substantive responses pose new ideas, ask questions, and/or generally add to the discussion topic in a meaningful and constructive way.

The peer response must occur on a separate day from the initial posting and instructor response (see below). This peer response must occur before Sunday, 11:59 pm MT. This response does not require a scholarly reference unless information is paraphrased and/or direct quotes are used, then APA guidelines apply. Peer responses must be a minimum of 150 words. References do not apply toward word count.

3. Instructor response: The student must respond to an instructor’s follow-up questions. The instructor’s question may be directed to the student or may be a question directed to another student in the section. The response must be comprehensive and scholarly in nature. Instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words. References do not apply toward word count.

The response to the instructor must occur on a day different from the initial post and a day different from the peer response. Responses to the instructor must occur before Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.

4. For week 8 only: Students are expected to post a peer response or an instructor post but are not required to do both. These posts must be a minimum of 100 words. References do not apply toward word count. The peer or instructor response must be on a different day than the initial post and must occur before Wednesday, 11:50 pm MT due to the shorter week.

Posting Requirements:

  1. The initial posting must be provided before Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.
  2. The initial posting must have at least one scholarly outside source that is cited within the posting and referenced. Required course textbooks, assigned readings and lesson information are not considered to be outside scholarly sources.
  3. Initial posting must be a minimum of 300 words; peer responses and instructor responses a minimum 150 words.
  4. The peer responses and instructor responses must be provided before Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.
  5. All postings are substantive and relate to the graded threaded discussion topic.
  6. Only one small quote (15 words or less) within the entire initial posting is accepted.
  7. Postings must occur on 3 separate days.
  8. For week 8 only: the required postings are amended due to the shorter week. Two posts are required. One initial post and either a peer response or an instructor response. Initial post must be a minimum of 200 words and the peer or instructor response must be a minimum of 100 words. Both posts are required to be on two separate days. All posts must be made by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT

Criteria for Content

  • Scholarliness: In this category, the student will conduct a search of the current databases and locate valid, relevant, and reliable information for the required topic. Each reference must be scholarly.
  • Application of Course Knowledge: In this category, the student demonstrates the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge, and information learned in the course lesson and outside readings. This information is then applied to a real-life professional situation as an example.
  • Interactive Dialogue: In this category, the minimum requirements are to provide an initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT of each week. In addition, one peer response and one instructor response are required. These postings must be completed by Sunday, 11:59 pm MT of each week. The initial posting, peer response, and instructor response must be on 3 separate days.
  • Grammar, Syntax, APA: Proper grammar, APA, and syntax is required for all posts. Students should follow the APA Manual 6th Edition. Additional APA information is available in Course Resources.
  • Participation Requirement: One initial posting, one peer response and one instructor response (for a total of 3 posts for the week) are required on 3 separate days.
nr 506 week 3 discussion effective coalition leadership
NR 506 Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership
  • Participation Deadline: The student must provide a substantive response to the graded threaded discussion topic. This must be posted by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT of each week. Peer and instructor responses must be posted by Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.
  • For week 8 only: the required postings are amended due to the shorter week. Two posts are required. One initial post and either a peer response or an instructor response. Initial post must be a minimum of 200 words and the peer or instructor response must be a minimum of 100 words. Both posts are required to be on two separate days. All posts must be made by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.
  • Check out Also:  NR 506 Week 2 Discussion Policy-Priority Selection

    • Criteria for Format and Special Instructions

    1. Instructor reserves the right to submit any threaded discussion posting to TurnItIn in order to verify the originality.
    2. When journals are used as the outside source of information, it is preferred that the journal be peer reviewed. The Chamberlain online librarian is very helpful in assisting you to find an article related to your topic. If you have questions concerning scholarly sources, please refer to the handout entitled “What is a scholarly source” located under “Course Resources” tab.
    3. Web sites vary in quality and scholarship. It is the responsibility of the student to determine the scholarly nature of the web site. If the instructor determines that the site failed to demonstrate scholarship, points maybe deducted. Students are cautioned to use care regarding .com sites. Some .com sites are excellent such as American Heart Association, but others are built by individuals and scholarliness is lacking. It is recommended that you check with your instructor before using a .com website as a reference.
    4. Only one small quote (15 words or less) within the entire initial posting is acceptable. It is expected that the student will paraphrase the information when presenting information from a scholarly source. The scholarly source(s) for the paraphrased information must be cited using APA format. Do not include a number of small quotes even if they are just a few words as your instructor considers a quote to be a quote no matter its limited size.
    5. Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NR 506 Week 3 Discussion Effective Coalition Leadership

    Grading Rubric

    Performance Category 100% or highest level of performance

    100%

    16 points

    		 Very good or high level of performance

    88%

    14 points

    		 Acceptable level of performance

    81%

    13 points

    		 Inadequate demonstration of expectations

    68%

    11 points

    		 Deficient level of performance

    56%

    9 points

    		 Failing level

    of performance

    55% or less

    0 points
     Total Points Possible= 50           16 Points    14 Points 13 Points        11 Points           9 Points          0 Points
    Scholarliness

    Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic topics.

    		 Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

    • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
    • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
    • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
    • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
    		 Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

    • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
    • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
    • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
    • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
    		 Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in all of the following elements:

    • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
    • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
    • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
    • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
    		 Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

    • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
    • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
    • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
    • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
    		 Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

    • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
    • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
    • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
    • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information.
    		 Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three or more of the following elements

    • Provides evidence of scholarly inquiry relevant to required TD topic(s).
    • Presents specific information from scholarly sources to develop a comprehensive presentation of facts.
    • Uses at least one outside scholarly reference that is relevant, less than 5 years old (use of older references requires instructor permission) and reliable for the required topic.*
    • Uses in-text citation and full reference at end of posting when presenting another person’s thoughts as quotes or paraphrase of information
       16 Points  14 Points  13 Points 11 Points 9 Points  0 Points
    Application of Course Knowledge

    Demonstrate the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge and information learned in the outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

    		 Presentation of information was exceptional and included all of the following elements:

    • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
    • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
    • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
    		 Presentation of information was good, but was superficial in places and included all of the following elements:

    • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
    • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
    • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
    		 Presentation of information was minimally demonstrated in the all of the following elements:

    • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
    • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
    • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
    		 Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in one of the following elements:

    • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
    • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from and scholarly resources to a professional experience.
    • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
    		 Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in two of the following elements:

    • Applies principles, knowledge and information from scholarly resources to the required topic.
    • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned from scholarly resources to a professional experience.
    • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
    		 Presentation of information is unsatisfactory in three of the following elements

    • Applies principles, knowledge and information and scholarly resources to the required topic.
    • Applies facts, principles or concepts learned scholarly resources to a professional experience.
    • Application of information is comprehensive and specific to the required topic.
       10 Points 9 Points      6 Points  0 Points
    Interactive Dialogue

    Initial post should be a minimum of 300 words (references do not count toward word count)

    The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each (references do not count toward word count)

    Responses are substantive and relate to the topic.

    		 Demonstrated all of the following:

    • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
    • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
    • Responses are substantive
    • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
    		 Demonstrated 3 of the following:

    • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
    • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
    • Responses are substantive
    • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
    		     Demonstrated 2 of the following:

    • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
    • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
    • Responses are substantive
    • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
    		 Demonstrated 1 or less of the following:

    • Initial post must be a minimum of 300 words.
    • The peer and instructor responses must be a minimum of 150 words each.
    • Responses are substantive
    • Responses are related to the topic of discussion.
     

    8 Points

    7 Points

     6 Points

    		         5 Points          4 Points

     0 Points
    Grammar, Syntax, APA

    Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

    The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

    Error is defined to be a unique APA error. Same type of error is only counted as one error.

    		 The following was present:

    • 0-3 errors in APA format

    AND