NR 599 Week 6 Assignment Medical Application Critical Appraisal Guidelines

NR 599 Week 6 Assignment Medical Application Critical Appraisal Guidelines

NR 599 Week 6 Assignment Medical Application Critical Appraisal Guidelines

The mobile health application market has experienced significant growth over the past few years. Statistics by IQVIA show that there are more than 318,000 health apps available in app stores globally, and more than 200 health apps are added daily. Medical apps have been beneficial since they enable the healthcare provider to access the necessary health data to facilitate patient care, regardless of their environmental setting. The growth of Digital Health tools, like mobile health apps and wearable sensors, have a great potential for improving human health. Besides, mobile health apps bring new approaches to managing health conditions, impacting patient care quality. The purpose of this paper NR 599 Week 6 Assignment Medical Application Critical Appraisal Guidelines is to describe the ICD10 Consult mobile app and discuss a clinical scenario relating to this app.

Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on NR 599 Week 6 Assignment Medical Application Critical Appraisal Guidelines  completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW

Name

The mobile app name is ICD10 Consult.

Author

ICD 10 Consult app was created and developed by Evan Schoenberg, a medical doctor (ophthalmologist). Evan Schoenberg has developed eleven other medical apps, nine of which are medical apps, while the other two are utility apps. He also developed a previous ICD 9 consult that was highly ranked in app reviews.

nursing masters

Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on NR 599 Week 6 Assignment Medical Application Critical Appraisal Guidelines done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

Endorsement

By the time of this research, the app had not been endorsed by the Food and Drug Administration, government agencies, academic institutions, or medical professionals.

Operation

The mobile application is compatible with both mobile and web-based devices. The compatibility requirements include iOS 13.0 or later for iPhones, iPadOS 13.0 or later for iPad, iOS 13.0 or later for iPod touch, macOS 11.0 or later for Mac, and iOS 9.0 for a Mac with Apple M1 chip. For Windows, it is compatible with Windows 11, Windows 10, Windows 8.1, Windows 8, Windows XP, Windows Vista, Windows 7, and Windows Surface Pro. However, the app is not currently available for Android.

Aesthetics

The ICD10 Consult app is easy to use and user-friendly. For instance, it allows the user to browse diagnoses by chapter, section, and subsection and search within specific hierarchies. It also has a favorites list, allowing quick access to the user’s most common codes, with groups to organize them. It enables the user to include custom, searchable notes on a per-code basis. It has a flexible search that speaks one’s language, a deep understanding of the codes, and an instant ICD9 to ICD10 conversion. Furthermore, the app has a slick interface that takes advantage of many open-source programs that can be viewed under the app’s broadly documented “Legal” section. Lastly, the app has numerous shortcuts, “smart” search terms with a vast number of synonyms, and diagnoses.

Purpose

The app’s purpose is to provide users with complete and current ICD10-CM resources. Besides, it has a smart text entry with numerous medical abbreviations built-in and significant documentation of each code to help promote proper reimbursement. The app also provides the feature of translating ICD-9 to ICD-10 codes wherever possible. Furthermore, the app explains additional coding steps and associated codes or diagnoses to the user.

Clinical Decision Making

The app has all of the ICD-10 coding information a healthcare provider would require for fast coding at the point of care. It offers significant clinical value to clinicians in making new diagnoses and treatments (Kusnoor et al., 2020). It can capture detailed information about a patient’s diagnoses and procedures that can significantly benefit patient care.

Safety

The app has no potential to cause harm to the user because data stored in the app remains only within the app. Besides, the app does not ask for the user’s personal information unless it is beyond doubt needed, and if it is asked, the asking is apparent. The app does not share the user’s personal information with anyone except when complying with the law, developing the products, or protecting the developer’s rights.

Privacy/Security

The app has a privacy policy based on Automattic’s privacy policy that is shared under a Creative Commons Share-alike license. The privacy policy indicates that the app may obtain automatic, non-personally-identifying analytics like the period the app is used. However, no personally identifying information can be sent to any server for any purpose unless expressly initiated by the user.

User

The app targets healthcare professionals, including nurses, physicians, clinic administrators, mid-levels, and any healthcare provider who attends to patients and codes for their work.

Distribution

Unfortunately, the app is designed for local use and is only available in the United States.

Credibility

The ICD 10 consult app has credible sources of information since it obtains the complete code database directly from the data files found at the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). However, the app does not cite where it has obtained the coding documentation, although it includes vast additional “chapters” of coding data that reads like a mini-coding textbook.

Relevance

The app contains current information, which is achieved through ad support, which provides the current, up-to-date ICD 10 codes. The app is currently up-to-date for 2022’s latest codes, with the latest update being April 1, 2022.

Clinical Scenario For This App

A 14-year-old AA female comes to the outpatient clinic with a chief complaint of chest pain. She states that the symptom began about two weeks ago. She describes chest pain as a burning sensation in the chest that occurs mostly after eating and worsens at night. She also mentions that she often experiences food regurgitation, which causes a burning sensation in the neck. Based on the clinical symptoms, the clinician diagnoses Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The ICD 10 Consult app will be used at this point to code the patient’s diagnosis using the ICD-10 coding rapidly. The clinician can go right into the ICD-10 search and begin typing the GERD diagnosis.

Alternatively, the clinician can get into the GI, and the app will guide them deeper into the code to go for more information or add laterality. Once the clinician gets down to billable codes, they will see little green lights next to them, but if the code is red, they will have to search deeper. The app will impact the scenario by providing an ICD-10 code that is billable, for example, GERD without esophagitis- K21.9, thus ensuring reimbursement (Kusnoor et al., 2020). Besides, it will save time since the clinician will not have to peruse the ICD-10 code manually to get the code for the diagnosis.

Conclusion

Overall, the ICD 10 consult is an exceptional ICD 10 coding app from a trusted developer. It has a simple interface that takes the user through the coding process up to 7 digits. It is compatible with iOS operating systems and Microsoft. User information cannot be sent to the server or any other device except if the user takes the action. Besides, the app can convert ICD-9 to ICD-10 codes.

References

Kusnoor, S. V., Blasingame, M. N., Williams, A. M., DesAutels, S. J., Su, J., & Giuse, N. B. (2020). A narrative review of the impact of the transition to ICD-10 and ICD-10-CM/PCS. JAMIA Open3(1), 126-131. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz066

Purpose

The purposes of this assignment are to: (a) demonstrate nursing informatics skills to critique commonly used mobile applications, (b) synthesize nursing and non-nursing knowledge using a guided appraisal process, and (c) develop NI skills with computer technologies to support professional and personal development with implementation of medical applications in clinical practice.

Mobile Health, also known as mHealth, is defined as the use of wireless communication to support efficiency in public health and clinical practice. To facilitate mHealth, mobile applications (apps) have been developed, which can be executed either on a mobile platform or on a web-based platform which is executed on a server. Mobile medical apps are often accessories to a FDA-regulated medical device. Incumbent upon each healthcare provider is a clear understanding of the implications of this guidance on clinical practice as well as demonstrate discretion with regard to medical app implementation.

Course Outcomes

This assignment is guided by the following Course Outcomes (COs):

CO 2 Demonstrate synthesis of nursing and non-nursing science with information and computer technologies through collaborative advanced nursing practice (PO 5)

CO 4 Exemplify professional values and scholarship to support professional and personal development (PO 1)

Preparation and Paper Outline:

PART 1: The medical application selection for this assignment is contingent upon the month of your birthday. Use the table below to identify the Medical App for this assignment.

Your Birth Month             Medical App for Assignment

January, February           MediCalc

March, April, May           AIDSinfo

June, July, August           CDC Milestone Tracker

September, October     ICD10

November, December  GoodRx

Use the Google Play Store for Android devices or the Apple iTunes App Store for Apple devices to search for the medical application as determined by the table above.

In order to complete the following guided appraisal, download the app to a mobile device (smartphone or tablet). The apps are free and do not require purchase to complete this assignment.

Provide proof of download by attaching a screenshot of the device screen in JPEG or PDF format to the assignment upload tab (in addition to submitting this assignment). Following the general instructions below for smartphone devices (specific device instructions may vary):

Android 4.0 and Newer: (Galaxy SIII, Galaxy S 4, Galaxy Note, HTC One,?Nexus phones, Droid phones)

Any Android phone running Ice Cream Sandwich (4.0) or later can easily take a screenshot. Hold the?Power?and?Volume Down?buttons together until the screen flashes and you hear the shutter sound. The screenshot image will appear in your?Gallery?app, usually inside the?Screenshots?folder

iPhone

The method for taking a screenshot in iOS has been the same since version 2.0. Hold the Power (Sleep/Wake) and Home buttons together until the screen flashes and you hear the shutter sound. The screenshot image will appear in your Photos app under Camera Roll.

PART 2: Answer the Medical App Critical Appraisal questions thoughtfully and comprehensively. Use the criteria headings on this outline as the headings on your properly APA- formatted paper.

NAME: What is the name of the app?

AUTHOR: Who created, developed, or maintains the app? Explain.

ENDORSEMENT: Is the app licensed by the Food and Drug Administration, other government agency, or endorsed by an academic institution or medical professional organization? Explain.

OPERATION: Which platform (mobile or web-based) is suitable for the app and why?

AESTHETICS: Is the information displayed in a way that is easy to navigate? Is it easy to use? Can you use it without instructions? Explain.

PURPOSE: What is the intended purpose or use of the app?

CLINICAL DECISION MAKING: What influence does the app have on clinical decision making? Explain.

SAFETY: Is there potential for patient harm? Explain.

PRIVACY/SECURITY: Does the app have privacy statement or setting? Is there a clear privacy policy stating information will be encrypted and not shared with third parties? Does the app share information on social networks? Are users notified in the event of a breach of privacy and health information? Explain.

USER: For whom is the app intended (providers, patients, or others)? Explain.

DISTRIBUTION: Is it designed for local use or wider distribution? Explain.

CREDIBILITY: How credible are the sources of information? How do you know? Explain.

RELEVANCE: How current is the information in the app? When was the last update? Is the content consistent with evidence-based literature or best practices/standards of care? Explain.

PART 3: Provide one example of an appropriate patient or clinical scenario for this app. The example should include the following details:

Patient Age-population (Pediatric, Adult, Geriatric)

Clinical Setting (Hospital, Private Practice, Extended Living Facility)

History of Present Illness and Diagnosis or Condition

Provide a detailed description of the app in your example. When will the app be implemented (at the Point-of-care or elsewhere)? Who will use the app? What potential impact will it have on the scenario? Incorporate the critical appraisal information from Part 2. Provide one evidence-based scholarly article as a reference to support clinical decision making.

This assignment will be graded on the quality of the information, inclusion of one evidence-based scholarly resource, use of citations, use of Standard English grammar, and organization based on the required components (see the paper headings and content details in Part 1).

The length of the paper is to be between 1,000 and 1,500 words, excluding title page and reference list.

Create this assignment using Microsoft (MS) Word. You can tell that the document is saved as a MS Word document because it will end in “.docx.”

APA format is required in this assignment, explicitly for in-text citations and the reference list. Use 12-point Times New Roman font with 1-inch margins and double spacing. See the APA manual for details regarding proper citation. See resources under Course Resources, “Guidelines for Writing Professional Papers” for further clarification.

* Scholarly Sources:?Only scholarly sources are acceptable for citation and reference in this course. These include?peer-reviewed?publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. The

textbooks and lessons are NOT considered to be outside scholarly sources. For the threaded discussions and reflection posts, reputable internet sources such as websites by government agencies (URL ends in .gov) and respected organizations (often ends in .org)?can be counted?as scholarly sources. The best outside scholarly source to use is a peer-reviewed nursing journal.? You are encouraged to use the Chamberlain library and search one of the available?databases?for a peer-reviewed journal article.??The following sources?should not be used: Wikipedia, Wikis, or blogs.? These websites?are not considered?scholarly?as anyone can add to these. Please be aware that .com websites can vary in scholarship and quality.? For?example,?the American Heart Association is a .com site with scholarship and quality.? It is the responsibility of the student to determine the scholarship and quality of any .com site.? Ask your instructor before using any site if you are unsure. Points will be deducted from the rubric if the site does not demonstrate scholarship or quality. Current outside scholarly sources must be published?with the last 5 years.? Instructor permission?must be obtained?BEFORE the assignment is due if using a source that is older than 5 years.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NR 599 Week 6 Assignment Medical Application Critical Appraisal Guidelines

The point-of-care tools I will use in my future NP practice include computers and systems like CDSS, EHR, and E-prescribing. I will stay current with new and innovative telecommunication tools in healthcare by joining a professional nursing organization that offers regular informatics training and publishes newsletters with current nursing informatics news and technology advances (Navaz et al., 2021). Besides, I will subscribe to newsletters with technology publications and follow the tech sites they recommend to remain current. In addition, I will attend nursing informatics conferences and informatics events. Conferences are a great opportunity to see innovative technology specific to nursing (Schiavone & Ferretti, 2021). I will listen to industry leaders during the conferences, attend classes, and talk with vendors about their products.

References
Navaz, A. N., Serhani, M. A., El Kassabi, H. T., Al-Qirim, N., & Ismail, H. (2021). Trends, Technologies, and Key Challenges in Smart and Connected Healthcare. IEEE access : practical innovations, open solutions, 9, 74044–74067. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3079217
Schiavone, F., & Ferretti, M. (2021). The FutureS of healthcare. Futures, 134, 102849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2021.102849

Late Assignment Policy

Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment.

In the event of an emergency that prevents timely submission of an assignment, students may petition their instructor for a waiver of the late submission grade reduction. The instructor will review the student’s rationale for the request and make a determination based on the merits of the student’s appeal. Consideration of the student’s total course performance to date will be a contributing factor in the determination. Students should continue to attend class, actively participate, and complete other assignments while the appeal is pending.

Also Check Out: NR 599 Week 4 Midweek Comprehension Questions

This Policy applies to assignments that contribute to the numerical calculation of the course letter grade.

Evaluation Methods

The maximum score in this class is 1,000 points. The categories, which contribute to your final grade, are weighted as follows.

Graded Item Points Weighting
Discussion (50 points, Weeks 1–7; 25 points, Week 8) 375 37.5%
Shared Governance Model Paper (Week 3) 200 20%
Management of Power Paper (Week 5) 200 20%
Executive Summary (Week 7) 225 22.5%
Total 1,000 100%

No extra credit assignments are permitted for any reason.

All of your course requirements are graded using points. At the end of the course, the points are converted to a letter grade using the scale in the table below. Percentages of 0.5% or higher are not raised to the next whole number. A final grade of 76% (letter grade C) is required to pass the course.

Letter Grade Points Percentage
A   940–1,000 94% to 100%
A-  920–939 92% to 93%
B+ 890–919 89% to 91%
B   860–889 86% to 88%
B-  840–859 84% to 85%
C+ 810–839 81% to 83%
C   760–809 76% to 80%
F   759 and below 75% and below

NOTE:To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday of the eighth week.

Students agree that, by taking this course, all required papers may be subject to submission for textual similarity review to Turnitin.com for the detection of plagiarism. All submitted papers will be included as source documents in the Turnitin.com reference database solely for the purpose of detecting plagiarism of such papers. Use of the Turnitin.com service is subject to the Terms and Conditions of Use posted on the Turnitin.com site.

Participation for MSN

Threaded Discussion Guiding Principles

The ideas and beliefs underpinning the threaded discussions (TDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The use of TDs provides students with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid environment that models professional and social interaction. The TD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship. Participation in the TDs generates opportunities for students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. TDs foster the development of members into a community of learners as they share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other disciplines.

Participation Guidelines

Each weekly threaded discussion is worth up to 25 points. Students must post a minimum of two times in each graded thread. The two posts in each individual thread must be on separate days. The student must provide an answer to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week. If the student does not provide an answer to each graded thread topic (not a response to a student peer) before the Wednesday deadline, 5 points are deducted for each discussion thread in which late entry occurs (up to a 10-point deduction for that week). Subsequent posts, including essential responses to peers, must occur by the Sunday deadline, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.

Direct Quotes

Good writing calls for the limited use of direct quotes. Direct quotes in Threaded Discussions are to be limited to one short quotation (not to exceed 15 words). The quote must add substantively to the discussion. Points will be deducted under the Grammar, Syntax, APA category.

Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category 10 9 8 4 0

Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.

  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
  • Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion
  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.