NRNP 6645 COMPREHENSIVE INTEGRATED PSYCHIATRIC ASSESSMENT
NRNP 6665 COMPREHENSIVE INTEGRATED PSYCHIATRIC ASSESSMENT
Comprehensive Integrated Psychiatric Assessment
Main Question Post: Comprehensive, integrated psychiatric assessments are the foundation for accurate diagnosis, effective treatment, and positive patient outcomes. Clinicians performing these assessments in the pediatric population understand the value of information attained from multiple sources in building a therapeutic alliance and determining appropriate treatment. This discussion post will analyze a video presentation of a psychiatric assessment of an adolescent male referred by PCP for depression and anxiety.
Proper interview techniques are integral to psychiatric assessments and require good organizational skills and practice. During the interview, the practitioner did well by explaining to the patient what she would be doing and ascertaining from the patient the reason for the visit. The practitioner maintained eye contact with the patient to show interest in what was being said, and when the patient did not understand what the practitioner meant by “how has your mood been lately?” the practitioner rephrased the question to elicit better responses. The practitioner was engaging and smiled, making the patient more comfortable. The practitioner also told the patient that they would discuss his report of anger, letting the patient know that his problem was heard and important. The patient was also provided privacy. Although the practitioner performed good assessment skills, key elements were lost during this interview. The practitioner did not introduce herself nor inform the patient of the confidentiality of their discussion. Although time may have been a factor, I felt that the practitioner too quickly asked questions, seemingly not placing significance on the patient’s responses. In doing so, the patient could be left feeling invalidated and can crush the therapeutic alliance.
According to Hilt & Nussbaum (2016), any mental health evaluation includes identifying and assessing safety concerns. A prudent practitioner will thoroughly assess reported safety issues and implement needed interventions. During the interview with the young male, compelling concerns were his report that the breakup with his girlfriend makes him really angry with her and others, not knowing why she broke up with him, and not wanting to be alive. Another concern was his possible minimization of substance use. My following line of questions would be regarding present suicidal thoughts as well as suicidal plans and intent. I would also ask about who he lives with and his gun access. Suicide is the second leading cause of death among adolescents, with the peak onset of suicidal ideations occurring during adolescence. The greater the severity of the ideations is associated with a higher likelihood of future suicide attempts (Ordaz et al., 2018).
According to Srinath et al. (2019), children and adolescents often do not initiate evaluation for mental health concerns due to embarrassment or a lack of understanding of symptoms. Therefore, accurate diagnosis and treatment implementation needs thorough assessments that include information from multiple sources and impeccable clinical skills. Comprehensive psychiatric assessments give clinicians, patients, and parents or guardians the tools necessary to improve their quality of life during a challenging time.
In performing psychiatric assessments, practitioners rely on useful tools such as symptom rating scales to facilitate diagnostic accuracy and referral recommendations. One symptom rating scale to use when assessing the child or adolescent is the Level 1 Cross-Cutting symptom measure. This tool lists selected symptoms of major DSM-5 disorders in a brief format and can be used to facilitate conversation during the psychiatric interview. The tool has two versions, one for caregivers and one for children in selected age groups. (Hilt & Nussbaum, 2016). Another rating scale is the Pediatric Symptom Checklist (PSC), a 35-item parent-reported or a 17-item parent and child-reported measure of adolescent psychosocial functioning. The PSC is among the most frequently used rating scales (Bergmann et al., 2020).
When treating children and adolescents, treatment options may differ from that of adults. Example of treatment options used when treating children includes Cognitive Behavioral Play Therapy(CBPT) and Reciprocal Imitation Training (RIT). CBPT is used in younger children and incorporates CBT strategies into play-based interventions leading to therapeutic work and learning during play. CBPT uses puppets or toys to teach children skills to overcome challenges (Bhide & Chakraborty, 2020). RIT is a naturalistic developmental–behavioral intervention that targets social interaction via engagement in extended bouts of reciprocal imitation. RIT is an evidence-based treatment for autism spectrum disorder (Ingersoll et al., 2017).
Parents or guardians play an essential role in child assessments. They often help build a therapeutic relationship between the child and provide and provide valuable insights into presenting problems, history, and behaviors in multiple settings. Parents’ or guardians’ participation in assessments can help build trust and form bonds that ultimately facilitate active treatment participation from the child and family.
References
Bergmann, P., Lucke, C., Nguyen, T., Jellinek, M., & Murphy, J. M. (2023). Identification and Utility of a Short Form of the Pediatric Symptom Checklist-Youth Self-Report (PSC-17-Y). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, Preprints, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000486Links to an external site.
Bhide, A., & Chakraborty, K. (2020). General Principles for Psychotherapeutic Interventions in Children and Adolescents. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 62, S299–S318. https://doi.org/10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_811_19Links to an external site.
Hilt, R. J., & Nussbaum, A. M. (2016). DSM-5 pocket guide for child and adolescent
mental health. American Psychiatric Association Publishing.
Ingersoll, B., Berger, N., Carlsen, D., & Hamlin, T. (2017). Improving social functioning and challenging behaviors in adolescents with ASD and significant ID: A randomized pilot feasibility trial of reciprocal imitation training in a residential setting. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 20(4), 236–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/17518423.2016.1211187Links to an external site.
Ordaz, S. J., Goyer, M. S., Ho, T. C., Singh, M. K., & Gotlib, I. H. (2018). Network basis of suicidal ideation in depressed adolescents. Journal of Affective Disorders, 226, 92–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2017.09.021Links to an external site.
Srinath, S., Jacob, P., Sharma, E., & Gautam, A. (2019). Clinical practice guidelines for assessment of children and adolescents. Indian Journal of Psychiatry, 61(2), 158–175. http://doi.org/10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_580_18Links to an external site.
Network basis of suicidal ideation in depressed adolescents.pdfDownload Network basis of suicidal ideation in depressed adolescents.pdf
Indentification and Utility of a short form of pediatric symptom.pdfDownload Indentification and Utility of a short form of pediatric symptom.pdf
General Principles for Psychotherapeutic Interventions in Children and Adolescents.pdf Download General Principles for Psychotherapeutic Interventions in Children and Adolescents.pdf
Clinical Practice Guidelines for assessment of children and adolescents.pdfDownload Clinical Practice Guidelines for assessment of children and adolescents.pdf
Improving social functioning and challenging behaviors in adolescents with ASD and significant ID_ A randomized pilot feasibility trial of reciprocal imitation training in a residential setting.pdf Download Improving social functioning and challenging behaviors in adolescents with ASD and significant ID_ A randomized pilot feasibility trial of reciprocal imitation training in a residential setting.pdf
Many assessment principles are the same for children and adults; however, unlike with adults/older adults, where consent for participation in the assessment comes from the actual client, with children it is the parents or guardians who must make the decision for treatment. Issues of confidentiality, privacy, and consent must be addressed. When working with children, it is not only important to be able to connect with the pediatric patient, but also to be able to collaborate effectively with the caregivers, other family members, teachers, and school counselors/psychologists, all of whom will be able to provide important context and details to aid in your assessment and treatment plans.
Some children/adolescents may be more difficult to assess than adults, as they can be less psychologically minded. That is, they have less insights into themselves and their motivations than adults (although this is not universally true). The PMHNP must also take into consideration the child’s culture and environmental context. Additionally, with children/adolescents, there are lower rates of neurocognitive disorders superimposed on other clinical conditions, such as depression or anxiety, which create additional diagnostic challenges.
In this Discussion, you review and critique the techniques and methods of a mental health professional as the practitioner completes a comprehensive, integrated psychiatric assessment of an adolescent. You also identify rating scales and treatment options that are specifically appropriate for children/adolescents.
Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NRNP 6645 COMPREHENSIVE INTEGRATED PSYCHIATRIC ASSESSMENT completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW
RESOURCES
Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.
TO PREPARE
- Review the Learning Resources and consider the insights they provide on comprehensive, integrated psychiatric assessment. Watch the Mental Status Examination B-6 and Simulation Scenario-Adolescent Risk Assessment videos.
- Watch the YMH Boston Vignette 5 video and take notes; you will use this video as the basis for your Discussion post.
BY DAY 3 OF WEEK 1
Based on the YMH Boston Vignette 5 video, post answers to the following questions:
- What did the practitioner do well? In what areas can the practitioner improve?
- At this point in the clinical interview, do you have any compelling concerns? If so, what are they?
- What would be your next question, and why?
Then, address the following. Your answers to these prompts do not have to be tailored to the patient in the YMH Boston video.
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NRNP 6645 COMPREHENSIVE INTEGRATED PSYCHIATRIC ASSESSMENT done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
- Explain why a thorough psychiatric assessment of a child/adolescent is important.
- Describe two different symptom rating scales that would be appropriate to use during the psychiatric assessment of a child/adolescent.
- Describe two psychiatric treatment options for children and adolescents that may not be used when treating adults.
- Explain the role parents/guardians play in assessment.
Support your response with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources and explain why each of your supporting sources is considered scholarly. Attach the PDFs of your sources.
Read a selection of your colleagues’ responses.
BY DAY 6 OF WEEK 1
Respond to at least two of your colleagues on 2 different days by offering additional insights or alternative perspectives on their analysis of the video, other rating scales that may be used with children, or other treatment options for children not yet mentioned. Be specific and provide a rationale with evidence.
Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the Reply button to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Post Reply, you cannot delete or edit your own posts and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Post Reply!
Hi Carlita,
Great Post! I really appreciate what you said about the risk of suicide among adolescent patients. That was my main concern as well. I wasn’t concerned about why his girlfriend broke up with him. What we agree is most relevant however is his reaction to it. I also appreciate your mention of play therapy, as that was another modality I thought of when considering pediatric-specific treatment options. Treatment options are different and symptom presentation is also different in some disease states between children and adults. We will need to be mindful of these differences in our practice.
I had some additional insights to offer on pediatric-specific about ratings scales that can be used for pediatric patients. The first is the Conners Scales and the second is the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory Version 4.0 (PedsQL4.0). The Connors Scale is used to assess for ADHD, with or without hyperactivity. The scale also assesses for Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD) and Conduct Disorder, which are both frequently associated with ADHD. The Connors Scale has an 80-item self-administered questionnaire for parents and a 28-item questionnaire for teachers. Each behavior is rated 0-3, with 0 being never and 3 being often, and higher scores being indicative of greater difficulties. The scale is a great way for practitioners to assess a patient across multiple settings and potential diagnoses. Mansour, et al. (2017) used the Connors Scale in their study on comorbid ADHD and Autism in pediatric patients. The researchers noted the importance of using age-appropriate screening tools for the most valid research results. They also used the Child Behavior Checklist in an NIH funded study, highlighting the importance of appropriate age-specific screening tools.
The PedsQL4.0 is an internationally recognized tool used to measure health-related quality of life. It uses a 5-point Likert scale from never (0) to always (4), with higher scores being indicative of a better quality of life. There are age appropriate versions for ages 2-4, 5-7, 8-12, and 13-18 years old. The PedsQL4.0 can be used for both healthy children and those with acute and chronic disease. The 23 items in the PedsQL4.0 comprise four core scales: Physical, emotional, social, and school functioning. Using specific and valid ratings scales is very important in psychiatric practice. Brahmbhatt, et al. (2019) discussed the importance of clinical decision pathways and pediatric-specific screening tools in their recent study on suicide risk screening. The paper noted that most pediatric suicides had been treated in a healthcare setting in the months immediately prior to their deaths. The paper represented the first interdisciplinary and international effort to generate clinical decision pathways to increase the effectiveness of suicide risk-screening in general hospital settings.
References
Brahmbhatt, K., Kurtz, B. P., Afzal, K. I., Giles, L. L., Kowal, E. D., Johnson, K. P., … & Workgroup, P. (2019). Suicide risk screening in pediatric hospitals: clinical pathways to address a global health crisis. Psychosomatics, 60(1), 1-9.
Mansour, R., Dovi, A. T., Lane, D. M., Loveland, K. A., & Pearson, D. A. (2017). ADHD severity as it relates to comorbid psychiatric symptomatology in children with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD). Research in developmental disabilities, 60, 52-64.