NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Research Design Comparison Assignment

Translational Research Graphic Organizer

Nursing Practice Problem:

Nursing practice problems vary in scope, manifestations, and affected populations. Nurse burnout is prevalent in current settings since approximately 34.6% of emergency department nurses encounter or are at risk of it (Kelly et al., 2021). The prevalence varies with settings depending on the workload and interventions for resilience, self-care, and coping. Nurse burnout hampers patient care; it increases stress, job dissatisfaction, and turnover rates (Lee et al., 2021). Nurses experiencing burnout cannot give patients maximum attention hence increasing the risk of misdiagnosis, treatment errors, and patients’ dissatisfaction with care. To avert the dangers of nurse burnout, mindfulness breathing training has been proposed to help nurses cope with burnout and approach patient care with a positive mindset and relaxed mood. As a coping strategy, mindfulness breathing is a meditation practice that improves nurses’ focus by empowering them to be more aware of their thoughts (Veiga et al., 2019; Gherardi-Donato et al., 2023). The awareness helps them to focus on what matters to patients and the care process. The practice promotes a sense of relaxation and relieves stress, which the study population critically needs for sustained performance.

Comparison 1: Translational Research vs. Qualitative Research

Criteria	Peer-Reviewed Translational Article and Permalink/Working Link:Slatyer, S., Craigie, M., Rees, C., Davis, S., Dolan, T., & Hegney, D. (2018). Nurse experience of participation in a mindfulness-based self-care and resiliency intervention. Mindfulness, 9, 610-617. DOI: 10.1007/s12671-017-0802-2   Translational Research Type: T3 (Translation to practice) The study is a clinical trial for enabling the delivery of the recommended and timely care to patients.	Peer-Reviewed Traditional Article and Permalink/Working Link:Brun, C., Akinyemi, A., Houtin, L., Mizzi, C., Cardoso, T., & Isnard Bagnis, C. (2023). Mindfulness and compassion training for health professionals: a qualitative study. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 8723. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1113453 Traditional Qualitative Research Type: qualitative study assessing the impact of a compassion-centered mindfulness program.	Observations (Similarities/Differences)Both studies are qualitative in nature and focus on mindfulness. However, the translational research article examines nurses’ experiences while the traditional research article evaluates a broader group of healthcare practitioners.
Methodology	The study was a mindfulness self-care and resiliency (MSCR) program piloted in Australia’s tertiary acute care hospital. A sample of twenty nurses received the program, and sixteen provided their experiences with the training through semi-structured interviews. The program contained a one-day educational workshop on introduction to mindfulness and weekly sessions of mindfulness skills, including breathing and body movement followed. Nurses also received fatigue resiliency training.	Brun et al. (2023) assessed the impacts of the Mindfulness-Based (MB) CARE program among healthcare professionals. The program is a curriculum dedicated to healthcare professionals to reduce burnout levels by training in mindfulness and compassion. Mindfulness training, which included breathing strategies, focused on developing participants’ non-judgmental attitude and good intentional skills, while the compassion component was primarily about enabling participants to accept themselves as human beings.	SimilaritiesBoth studies are evaluation programs on the impact of mindfulness-based interventions. Differences The study groups, samples, and the length of the programs differ in the articles. The impact areas of mindfulness interventions also differ in the articles. Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline? Get your assignment on NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Research Design Comparison Assignment  completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW Do My Paper
Goals	The study aimed at achieving two major goals; reducing compassion fatigue among nurses and enhancing their resilience. These skills enable them to work competently amid workplace stressors increasing the risk of burnout.	The study’s primary aim was to evaluate the impact of a compassionate-centered mindfulness program on healthcare practitioners. A critical component of the program was mindfulness breathing, which is the current project’s focus.	Similarities/DifferencesBoth studies evaluated the impact of mindfulness-based interventions on healthcare professionals. However, the translational research article examines the impact of the intervention on reducing compassion fatigue among nurses and enhancing their resilience. In contrast, the traditional research article focused on practitioners’ ability to care for themselves and how the program impacted their practice.
Data Collection	Researchers collected data via individual unstructured interviews. Focus areas included how the program benefitted nurses in developing feelings of inner calm, using self-care strategies, and gaining perspectives and insight.	Brun et al. (2023) conducted phone (semi-structured) interviews with healthcare practitioners who benefitted from the program. Focus areas included: the training experience, practitioners’ ability to care for themselves, and how the program impacted their practice.	Similarities In both studies, data were collected via interviews; thus, there were one-on-one interactions to explore participants’ experiences. Differences The studied differed in the type of interviews. Slatyer et al. (2018) primarily relied on unstructured interviews while Brun et al. (2023) used semi-structured interviews. Unstructured interviews provide rich details through active listening and probing and participants are less likely to withhold information.

 

Comparison 2: Translational Research vs. Quantitative Research

Criteria	Peer-Reviewed Translational Article and Permalink/Working Link:Gracia Gozalo, R. M., Ferrer Tarrés, J. M., Ayora Ayora, A., Alonso Herrero, M., Amutio Kareaga, A., & Ferrer Roca, R. (2019). Application of a mindfulness program among healthcare professionals in an intensive care unit: Effect on burnout, empathy and self-compassion. Medicina Intensiva, 43(4), 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medin.2018.02.005 Translational Research Type: translation to practice (T3) The study is designed to enable healthcare professionals to deliver the recommended and timely care to patients.	Peer-Reviewed Traditional Article and Permalink/Working Link:Yıldırım, D., & Çiriş Yıldız, C. (2022). The effect of mindfulness-based breathing and music therapy practice on nurses’ stress, work-related strain, and psychological well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: a randomized controlled trial. Holistic Nursing Practice, 36(3), 156–165. https://doi.org/10.1097/HNP.0000000000000511 Traditional Quantitative Research Type: an experimental study. Researchers conduct such studies to support or refute a hypothesis.	Observations (Similarities/Differences)Similarities Both studies are experimental; outcomes are compared before and after the intervention. A comparative analysis of outcomes is used to deduce outcomes. Differences The main difference is that the translational research is a pre-post study using one group while the traditional research article compares findings among two groups.
Methodology	Gracia Gozalo et al. (2019) conducted a longitudinal study with an intrasubject pre-post intervention design. Participants included physicians, nurses, and nursing assistants working in an intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital.In this study, researchers conducted a workshop on the practice of mindfulness and its usefulness, followed by 8-week short guided practices via a WhatsApp group. Participants also received daily reminders with stimulating messages.	Yıldırım and Çiriş Yıldız (2022) conducted a randomized controlled trial in a COVID-19 department of a Turkish university hospital. Nurses caring for COVID-19 patients were divided into intervention and control groups of 52 participants each. The intervention group received mindfulness-based breathing and music therapy education.	Similarities Both studies use quantitative approaches to test hypotheses. Outcomes before and after the intervention are compared. Differences In the translational research article, researchers train nurses primarily on mindfulness. However, the second study combines mindfulness breathing and music therapy.
Goals	The study’s primary goal was to evaluate the impact of a mindfulness training program on burnout levels, empathy, self-compassion, and mindfulness of healthcare professionals. Regarding mindfulness breathing, participants were trained on internal anchoring in breathing and attention to breathing.	The study’s primary goal was to investigate how mindfulness-based breathing and music therapy practices impact nurses’ stress, work-related strain, and psychological well-being of nurses caring for COVID-19 patients. It hypothesized that mindfulness-based breathing and music therapy are effective in reducing nurses’ stress levels and raising their well-being levels.	Similarities Both studies evaluate the impact of a mindfulness-based program (that includes mindfulness breathing) on healthcare professionals. Differences The study group is broader in the translational research article while the traditional research article focuses on nurses. Besides, the targeted outcomes differ.
Data Collection	Gracia Gozalo et al. (2019) administered questionnaires before and after the intervention. The main measurements included burnout levels, empathy, self-compassion, and mindfulness before and after the training program. Other data were demographic and workplace variables.	The researchers used different forms to collect different data and survey participants. The first was a personal information form for demographic details like age, gender, and marital status. The second was State Anxiety Inventory (STI) for identifying anxiety levels. The third tool was the psychological well-being scale for measuring psychological well-being. The last tool was a work-related strain scale for measuring strain levels.	SimilaritiesIn both studies, researchers used qualitative data collection tools to compare findings before and after the intervention. Differences The main difference is the use of questionnaires only in the translational research article while researchers use different survey forms in the traditional research article.

References

Brun, C., Akinyemi, A., Houtin, L., Mizzi, C., Cardoso, T., & Isnard Bagnis, C. (2023). Mindfulness and compassion training for health professionals: a qualitative study. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 8723. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1113453

Gherardi-Donato, E. C. D. S., Díaz-Serrano, K. V., Barbosa, M. R., Fernandes, M. N. D. F., Gonçalves-Ferri, W. A., Camargo Júnior, E. B., & Reisdorfer, E. (2023). The impact of an online mindfulness-based practice program on the mental health of Brazilian nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(4), 3666. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20043666

Gracia Gozalo, R. M., Ferrer Tarrés, J. M., Ayora Ayora, A., Alonso Herrero, M., Amutio Kareaga, A., & Ferrer Roca, R. (2019). Application of a mindfulness program among healthcare professionals in an intensive care unit: Effect on burnout, empathy and self-compassion. Medicina Intensiva, 43(4), 207–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medin.2018.02.005

Kelly, L. A., Gee, P. M., & Butler, R. J. (2021). Impact of nurse burnout on organizational and position turnover. Nursing Outlook, 69(1), 96–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2020.06.008

Lee, M. M. D., Gensimore, M. M., Maduro, R. S., Morgan, M. K., & Zimbro, K. S. (2021). The impact of burnout on emergency nurses’ intent to leave: a cross-sectional survey. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 47(6), 892–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2021.07.004

Slatyer, S., Craigie, M., Rees, C., Davis, S., Dolan, T., & Hegney, D. (2018). Nurse experience of participation in a mindfulness-based self-care and resiliency intervention. Mindfulness, 9, 610-617. DOI: 10.1007/s12671-017-0802-2

Veiga, G., Rodrigues, A. D., Lamy, E., Guiose, M., Pereira, C., & Marmeleira, J. (2019). The effects of a relaxation intervention on nurses’ psychological and physiological stress indicators: a pilot study. Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, 35, 265-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctcp.2019.03.008

Yıldırım, D., & Çiriş Yıldız, C. (2022). The effect of mindfulness-based breathing and music therapy practice on nurses’ stress, work-related strain, and psychological well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: a randomized controlled trial. Holistic Nursing Practice, 36(3), 156–165. https://doi.org/10.1097/HNP.0000000000000511

NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Research Design Comparison Assignment

NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Research Design Comparison Assignment

The purpose of this assignment is to conduct a comparison on different research designs to better understand their designs and application. Understanding the different types of research design is important so that nurses can effectively apply evidence-based research into practice to address issues and offer better patient care.

You will utilize your approved nursing practice problem to complete the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments for this course and NUR-590, during which you will synthesize all of the sections into a final written paper detailing your evidence-based practice project proposal.

Click here to ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT on NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Research Design Comparison Assignment

Review feedback from your instructor on your “Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal: Identification of Nursing Practice Problem,” submitted in Topic 1. If your original proposed nursing problem was outside the scope of nursing practice or not conducive to an evidence-based practice project proposal, work with your instructor to identify a new topic prior to beginning this assignment. If your proposed topic requires revision, complete this prior to beginning this assignment. 

Conduct a literature search on your approved nursing practice problem. Find two translational research articles, one quantitative article, and one qualitative article. Using the “Translational Research Graphic Organizer,” present your proposed topic and, in the tables provided, compare one translational study to the quantitative study, and one translational study to the qualitative study.

Refer to the “Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Assignment Overview” document for an overview of the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments with regards to NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Research Design Comparison Assignment.

You are required to cite four peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.

Translational Research Graphic Organizer

State the nursing practice problem for your evidence-based practice project. If your nursing problem has not yet been approved, make any required changes or revisions to your nursing practice problem prior to starting the assignment. Using your proposed topic, conduct a literature search and complete the tables below.

Nursing Practice Problem: The nursing practice problem is obesity among school-age children.

Comparison 1: Translational Research vs. Qualitative Research
Criteria Peer-Reviewed Translational Article and Permalink/Working Link:
Joseph, E. D., Kracht, C. L., St. Romain, J., Allen, A. T., Barbaree, C., Martin, C. K., & Staiano, A. E. (2019). Young children’s screen time and physical activity: Perspectives of parents and early care and education center providers. Global Pediatric Health, 6, 2333794X19865856. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2333794X19865856

Translational Research Type:

Translation to practice (T3) Peer-Reviewed Traditional Article and Permalink/Working Link:
Stiglic, N., & Viner, R. M. (2019). Effects of screentime on the health and well-being of children and adolescents: A systematic review of reviews. BMJ Open, 9(1), e023191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023191

Traditional Qualitative Research Type: systematic review of past literature. Observations (Similarities/Differences)

Methodology Four focus groups (3 parents and 1 ECE provider) were conducted and thematic analysis performed to identify themes and subthemes on children’s screen time and physical activity.
Twenty-eight caregivers (21 parents and 7 ECE providers) participated in the research. A systematic review of past studies on the evidence for health and well-being effects of screen time in children and adolescents was conducted. 13 reviews were identified. Joseph et al. (2019) used focus groups while Stiglic and Viner (2019) did a literature review.
Goals The primary goal was to seek input from caregivers on barriers and facilitators of physical activity and screen time to comprehensively address them and promote children’s health.

The study systematically examined the evidence of harms and benefits relating to screen time for children and young people’s health and well-being. Joseph et al. (2019) examined how caregivers’ input regarding physical activity and screen time can be used to promote children’s health while Stiglic and Viner (2019) examined what past studies concluded regarding harms and benefits of screen time and children’s health and well-being.

NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Research Design Comparison Assignment Data Collection

Data for the study was obtained from focus groups containing twenty-eight caregivers. Focus groups were held between January and March 2017. Stiglic and Viner (2019) searched electronic databases (Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL) in February 2018. Joseph et al. (2019) collected data from participants while Stiglic and Viner (2019) collected from peer-reviewed articles.

Comparison 2: Translational Research vs. Quantitative Research

Criteria Peer-Reviewed Translational Article and Permalink/Working Link:
Schwarzfischer, P., Gruszfeld, D., Socha, P., Luque, V., Closa-Monasterolo, R., Rousseaux, D., … & Grote, V. (2020). Effects of screen time and playing outside on anthropometric measures in preschool aged children. PloS One, 15(3), e0229708. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229708
Translational Research Type: research focused on outcomes in populations (T4) Peer-Reviewed

Traditional Article and Permalink/Working Link:

Goncalves, W. S. F., Byrne, R., Viana, M. T., & Trost, S. G. (2019). Parental influences on screen time and weight status among preschool children from Brazil: a cross-sectional study. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 16(1), 1-8. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0788-3
Traditional Quantitative Research Type: A cross-sectional study.
[experimental research] Observations (Similarities/Differences)

Methodology Schwarzfischer et al. (2020) assessed children of the European Childhood Obesity Project annually by questionnaire from 3 until 6 years of age with focus on playing outside (PO) and screen time. A survey measuring sociodemographic data, weekday and weekend screen time, and parental self-efficacy for limiting screen time. Both studies evaluated outcomes. However, Schwarzfischer et al. (2020) used questionnaires while Goncalves et al. (2019) did a survey.

Goals Schwarzfischer et al. (2020) investigated the relationship between average time spent on playing outside and screen time and anthropometric measures (body weight, waist circumference, and height) at 3 and 6 years of age. Goncalves et al. (2019) examined the relationships between parental screen time, self-efficacy to limit screen time, child screen time and child BMI in preschool-aged children. Both researches examined the relationship between screen time and measures related to obesity such as weight gain. However, Schwarzfischer et al. (2020) focused on various anthropometric measures while Goncalves et al. (2019) focused on child BMI.

Data Collection Body weight, waist circumference and height were measured at 3 and 6 years of age to calculate Body-Mass-Index z-Scores (zBMI) and waist-to-height ratio (WTH) of 526 children of CHOP.
Schwarzfischer et al. (2020) applied linear, logistic and quantile regressions to test whether playing outside and screen time impacted anthropometric measures. Height and weight were measured to derive BMI and BMI percentile.
Goncalves et al. (2019) further used observed variable path analysis to examine the relationship between parental and child variables. Schwarzfischer et al. (2020) measured zBMI and waist-to-height ratio while Goncalves et al. (2019) measured height and weight to derive BMI.

NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Research Design Comparison Assignment References

Goncalves, W. S. F., Byrne, R., Viana, M. T., & Trost, S. G. (2019). Parental influences on screen time and weight status among preschool children from Brazil: a cross-sectional study. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 16(1), 1-8. doi: 10.1186/s12966-019-0788-3
Joseph, E. D., Kracht, C. L., St. Romain, J., Allen, A. T., Barbaree, C., Martin, C. K., & Staiano, A. E. (2019). Young children’s screen time and physical activity: Perspectives of parents and early care and education center providers. Global Pediatric Health, 6, 2333794X19865856. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2333794X19865856
Schwarzfischer, P., Gruszfeld, D., Socha, P., Luque, V., Closa-Monasterolo, R., Rousseaux, D., … & Grote, V. (2020). Effects of screen time and playing outside on anthropometric measures in preschool aged children. PloS One, 15(3), e0229708. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229708
Stiglic, N., & Viner, R. M. (2019). Effects of screentime on the health and well-being of children and adolescents: A systematic review of reviews. BMJ Open, 9(1), e023191. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023191

Translational Research Graphic Organizer

State the nursing practice problem for your evidence-based practice project. If your nursing problem has not yet been approved, make any required changes or revisions to your nursing practice problem prior to starting the assignment. Using your proposed topic, conduct a literature search and complete the tables below.

Nursing Practice Problem:

Comparison 1: Translational Research vs. Qualitative Research
Criteria Peer-Reviewed Translational Article and Permalink/Working Link: NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Research Design Comparison Assignment

Translational Research Type:

Peer-Reviewed Traditional Article and Permalink/Working Link:

Traditional Qualitative Research Type: Observations (Similarities/Differences)

Methodology

Goals

Data Collection

Comparison 2: Translational Research vs. Quantitative Research
Criteria Peer-Reviewed Translational Article and Permalink/Working Link:

Translational Research Type: Peer-Reviewed Traditional Article and Permalink/Working Link:

Traditional Quantitative Research Type:
Observations (Similarities/Differences)
Methodology

Goals

Data Collection

References

Topic 2 DQ 1

Explain the value of biostatistics in population health research. Describe the role of epidemiology in researching and addressing population health challenges. How are epidemiology and biostatistics significant to your evidence-based practice proposal?

Population health is being used in policy, health care, community, research settings, and in almost every