NURS 6051 Week 8 Assignment Workflow Process

A Workflow Process for Call Light Management

Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on NURS 6051 Week 8 Assignment Workflow Process completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW

Do My Paper

Walden University

A Workflow Process for Call Light Management

Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on NURS 6051 Week 8 Assignment Workflow Process done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

Meet my deadline

Patient survey reports show that my unit struggles with our call light process, as this is a … NURS 6051 Week 8 Assignment – Workflow Process

Current Method

Our call light system allows for multiple, consecutive calls at a time, and sometimes it can be tough to answer and relay information promptly to the appropriate personnel. Usually, …

Measuring Tool

Rules

Improvements

Summary. NURS 6051 Week 8 Assignment – Workflow Process

NURS 6051 Week 9 Discussion

Impact of HITECH on My Organization

Overall, the impact of the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health ACT of 2009 has been very positive at my current facility. The electronic health record … NURS 6051 Week 8 Assignment Workflow Process

Impact of Incentives and Meaningful Use

As listed above, meaningful use incentives are geared towards meeting the goals of …

Article of Successful Meaningful Use

One of the pivotal goals in meaningful use is decrease in medication errors. Nuckkols et al. wrote …

NURS 6051 Week 8 Discussion (Walden)

Practice Issue

The practice issue to be discussed in this paper is the use of needleless systems by nurses in the ICU. As a travel nurse across the south, I saw a significant disparity in different hospitals ….

Health IT Supporting Evidenced-Based Practice

As mentioned in this week’s reading assignment, gone are the days when nurses were dependent on local libraries and monthly journals. With the advent of the internet and the on-… NURS 6051 Week 8 Assignment Workflow Process

NURS 6051 Week 10 Discussion (Walden)

RN PHI Responsibility

According to the American Nurses Association (ANA), protecting a patient’s …

PHI and Portable Devices

HealthIT.gov recommends NOT using portable storage devices to transport PHI due to the …

My Facility and PHI

University Hospital is a Magnet hospital, and it prides itself on using the best evidence-based …

NURS 6051 Week 11 Assignment (Walden)

Data/Information/Knowledge/Wisdom Continuum

ata/Information/Knowledge/Wisdom Continuum

As a registered nurse (RN), working in an intensive critical care unit (ICU) is seen as the zenith of clinical skills and knowledge. Every day, you are continuously faced with critical decisions NURS 6051 Week 8 Assignment Workflow Process

Clinical Question

Will obtaining the CCRN certificate lead to nurses in the ICU obtaining more critical care knowledge that can lead to wisdom in their role as a nurse?

Data and Information

The American Nurses Association (ANA) define data as “discrete entities that are described

CCRN Search

Knowledge on the CCRN

Transforming CCRN knowledge to Critical Care Wisdom. NURS 6051 Weekly Discussions and Assignments

NURS 6051 Portfolio Assignment: The Role of the Nurse Informaticist in Systems Development and Implementation

NURS 6051 Assignment: Policy/Regulation Fact Sheet

NURS 6051 Week 11 Discussion (Walden)

Health Literacy Responsibility

According to the U. S. Department of Health and Services (HSS), all public health care …

Patient Resource to Evaluate Information

One of the best online resources for both patients and health care professionals is the …

Additional Strategies

According to a 2016 Gallup poll, nurses are once again seen as the most trusted and … NURS 6051 Week 8 Assignment Workflow Process

NURS 6051 Week 11 FINAL PAPER (Walden)

A Patient Guide for Clostridium difficile

Walden University: Nursing 6051, Section 9

A Patient Guide for Clostridium difficile

Clostridium difficile has been found to be the main cause of gastrointestinal-related death …

Health Literacy Promotion Among Patients

The attached brochure was created for the sake of increasing health literacy and …

Conclusion

Since C. diff has the potential to kill or significantly disturb the health of patients, it is ...

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Content

Name: NURS_5051_Week4_ Application_ Rubric

Grid View

List View

	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
Quality of Work Submitted: The extent of which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking.	Points:Points Range: 27 (27%) – 30 (30%) Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 24 (24%) – 26 (26%) Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 21 (21%) – 23 (23%) Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately addressed. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 20 (20%) Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed. Feedback:
Quality of Work Submitted: The purpose of the paper is clear.	Points:Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Purpose of the assignment is vague or off topic. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)No purpose statement was provided. Feedback:
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extend to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts.	Points:Points Range: 9 (9%) – 10 (10%)Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts. Feedback: NURS 6051 Week 8 Assignment Workflow Process	Points:Points Range: 8 (8%) – 8 (8%)Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)Shows some degree of understanding of key concepts. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics. Feedback:
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extend to which the work reflects the student’s ability to: Apply and integrate material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) and credible outside resources.	Points:Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%) Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 2-3 course resources to suppport point of view. Feedback: NURS 6051 Week 8 Assignment – Workflow Process	Points:Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 2-3 course resources to support major points and point of view. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)Minimally includes and integrates specific information from 2-3 resources to support major points and point of view. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resoruce to support major points and point of view. Feedback:
Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas: The extend to which the work reflects the student’s ability to: Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, textbook) and outside, credible resources by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections.	Points:Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%) Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Applies meaning to the field of advanced nursing practice. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)Identifies but does not interpret or apply concepts, and/or strategies correctly; ideas unclear and/or underdeveloped. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)Rarely or does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies. Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.	Points:Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity Feedback: NURS 6051 Week 8 Assignment Workflow Process	Points:Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 60%- 79% of the time. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time. Feedback: NURS 6051 Week 8 Assignment Workflow Process
Written Expression and Formatting English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation NURS 6051 Week 4 Discussion – Innovative Technology	Points:Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Feedback: NURS 6051 Week 8 Assignment Workflow Process
Written Expression and Formatting The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.	Points:Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Uses correct APA format with no errors. Feedback: NURS 6051 Week 8 Assignment Workflow Process	Points:Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3-4) APA format errors. Feedback:	Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. Feedback: NURS 6051 Week 8 Assignment Workflow Process

Excellent

Good

Fair

Poor

Quality of Work Submitted:
The extent of which work meets the assigned criteria and work reflects graduate level critical and analytic thinking.

Points:Points Range: 27 (27%) – 30 (30%) Assignment exceeds expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 75% containing exceptional breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.

Feedback:

Points:Points Range: 24 (24%) – 26 (26%) Assignment meets expectations. All topics are addressed with a minimum of 50% containing good breadth and depth about each of the assignment topics.

Feedback:

Points:Points Range: 21 (21%) – 23 (23%) Assignment meets most of the expectations. One required topic is either not addressed or inadequately addressed.

Feedback:

Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 20 (20%) Assignment superficially meets some of the expectations. Two or more required topics are either not addressed or inadequately addressed.

Feedback:

Quality of Work Submitted:
The purpose of the paper is clear.

Points:Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)A clear and comprehensive purpose statement is provided which delineates all required criteria.

Feedback:

Points:Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Purpose of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

Feedback:

Points:Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Purpose of the assignment is vague or off topic.

Feedback:

Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)No purpose statement was provided.

Feedback:

Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas:
The extend to which the work reflects the student’s ability to:Understand and interpret the assignment’s key concepts.

Points:Points Range: 9 (9%) – 10 (10%)Demonstrates the ability to critically appraise and intellectually explore key concepts.

Feedback: NURS 6051 Week 8 Assignment Workflow Process

Points:Points Range: 8 (8%) – 8 (8%)Demonstrates a clear understanding of key concepts.

Feedback:

Points:Points Range: 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)Shows some degree of understanding of key concepts.

Feedback:

Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)Shows a lack of understanding of key concepts, deviates from topics.

Feedback:

Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas:
The extend to which the work reflects the student’s ability to: Apply and integrate material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, and textbook) and credible outside resources.

Points:Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%) Demonstrates and applies exceptional support of major points and integrates 2 or more credible outside sources, in addition to 2-3 course resources to suppport point of view.

Feedback: NURS 6051 Week 8 Assignment – Workflow Process

Points:Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)Integrates specific information from 1 credible outside resource and 2-3 course resources to support major points and point of view.

Feedback:

Points:Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)Minimally includes and integrates specific information from 2-3 resources to support major points and point of view.

Feedback:

Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)Includes and integrates specific information from 0 to 1 resoruce to support major points and point of view.

Feedback:

Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas:
The extend to which the work reflects the student’s ability to: Synthesize (combines various components or different ideas into a new whole) material in course resources (i.e. video, required readings, textbook) and outside, credible resources by comparing different points of view and highlighting similarities, differences, and connections.

Points:Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%) Synthesizes and justifies (defends, explains, validates, confirms) information gleaned from sources to support major points presented. Applies meaning to the field of advanced nursing practice.

Feedback:

Points:Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)Summarizes information gleaned from sources to support major points, but does not synthesize.

Feedback:

Points:Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)Identifies but does not interpret or apply concepts, and/or strategies correctly; ideas unclear and/or underdeveloped.

Feedback:

Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)Rarely or does not interpret, apply, and synthesize concepts, and/or strategies.

Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting Paragraph and Sentence Structure: Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are clearly structured and carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.

Points:Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity

Feedback: NURS 6051 Week 8 Assignment Workflow Process

Points:Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 80% of the time.

Feedback:

Points:Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.

Feedback:

Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for structure, flow, continuity and clarity < 60% of the time.

Feedback: NURS 6051 Week 8 Assignment Workflow Process

Written Expression and Formatting English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

NURS 6051 Week 4 Discussion – Innovative Technology

Points:Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

Feedback:

Points:Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Feedback:

Points:Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

Feedback:

Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

Feedback: NURS 6051 Week 8 Assignment Workflow Process

Written Expression and Formatting The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.

Points:Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)Uses correct APA format with no errors.

Feedback: NURS 6051 Week 8 Assignment Workflow Process

Points:Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.

Feedback:

Points:Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.

Feedback:

Points:Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.

Feedback: NURS 6051 Week 8 Assignment Workflow Process

Show Descriptions Show Feedback

Also Read:

NURS 6051 Week 1 Assignment Knowledge Continuum

NURS 6051 Week 9 Discussion Hitech Legislation

The of Nurse Informaticist in System Development and Implementation

Advancement in technology and its integration in health to enhance patient safety and workflow efficiency influence additional roles and responsibilities for nurses, especially during the implementation of new systems (Koivunen & Saranto, 2018). Health information technology (HIT) is a core component of enhancing patient care, making informed decisions about care delivery and developing care plans through inter-professional collaboration. Nurses use HIT to improve patient care, enhance care coordination and improve accessibility to patient information as well as efficiency (Ihsan & Kadir, 2018). The introduction of a new information system in healthcare organizations requires the involvement of nurses at all stages of the system development life cycle (SDLC). The purpose of this paper is to describe the role of a graduate nurse to guide participation in the implementation team of a new HIT system. The description focuses on nurses’ role based on the SDLC stages and tasks and their participation in each stage.

Role Description

a). Planning and Requirement Definition

The planning and requirement definition is the first phase of the SDLC process and entails evaluation of the scope of the present system and overview of the proposed new system and its objectives. Considerations include cost, time, benefits and other critical components of the system. In this phase, stakeholders also consider constraints, threats, and security issues linked to the proposed system. At this stage, the graduate-level nurse has significant roles in the SDLC process (Laureate Education, 2018). The nurse works with the interdisciplinary team to establish system’s requirements including technical, clinical and service delivery elements. As end user, the nurse focuses on how the new system should meet the different care needs (Yen et al., 2017). The graduate nurse can also assist testing and identifying design flaws in the new system to ensure that it captures all needs and requirements. The role of the nurse is to identify concerns and needs of the frontline nurse to ensure that the system is tailored to deal with the ensuing challenges and care demands.

b). Analysis

The analysis stage entails establishing system’s process and workflows. The stage also involves determining if the system meets the requirements and evaluating any need for changes. The phase provides a chance to ensure that end-user needs are incorporates into the system to meet expectations. The stage involves defining requirements and prototype of the new system. At this stage, the graduate nurse has an essential role of working with the interdisciplinary team in helping identify essential challenges that the system may have to the end-user and offer possible solution or seek alternatives from the team (Laureate Education, 2018b). The nurse explains components that were working in the previous system with the developer to determine what needs to be added and its overall impact on the information infrastructure. Through the guidelines and inputs, the team ensures that it does not deploy a faulty system that fails to meet the aspirations of the facility.

c). Designing the new System

The design face entails defining the databases, applications and user interfaces of the new system. These components represent the functional aspects of the system for effective delivery to work flawlessly. In this phase, the team generates reports, mockups, prototypes and screenshots to determine possible hitches to ensure that it meets the requirements (Wager et al., 2017). In this phase, the graduate nurse may have a limited role due to the technical nature of the phase. However, the nurse can recommend certain operational mechanisms to enhance the functioning of the system. The graduate nurse ensures that system design is easy to use and friendly to the end-user. The nurse should also establish the applicability of the system to meet end-user’s informational needs.

d). Implementation Phase

The implementation phase is the most critical as the majority of system coding for the program occurs and the system is placed into production. The developer transfers data and components from the old system to the new one and installs and rolls it out for end-users (Magnuson & Dixon, 2020). In collaboration with the interdisciplinary team working on the system, the graduate nurse has a role to undertake system performance evaluation and assist in identifying chances for redesigning where the evaluation process suggests so. The nurse should help in educating and training other nurses and staff members on the working of the new system.

e). Post-Implementation Support

The post-implementation phase entails testing and maintenance of the new system. The system developer needs to test the system before delivering it to the organization. Testing purposes to ascertain that the system offers appropriate output and solves issues it is expected to address. The gradate nurse ensures that the output offered by the system aligns with the health care infrastructure needs, especially end-user requirements and interface (Mathews et al., 2019). The system should meet nursing documentation roles like capturing, storing, and retrieving information for effective, and informed decision making. The graduate nurse ensures that all issues experienced post-implementation are addressed and system developers have strategies to upgrade and make it capture the different organizational needs.

Conclusion

A graduate nurse is an essential component of developing a new system based on the various stage of the SDCL. The nurse acts as a leader, contributor through input, and guidelines the team on the scope to meet needs based on the requirements. from planning to the post-implementation phase, the nurse helps to make the system better and capture all needs of end-user nurses in meeting care delivery needs based on identified population.

References

Ihsan, S. N., & Kadir, T. A. A. (2018). Adoption of Software Development Life Cycle (SDLC)

Model in Games Development Framework for Serious Games Applications. Advanced Science Letters, 24(10), 7300-7304. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2018.12932

Koivunen, M., & Saranto, K. (2018). Nursing professionals’ experiences of the facilitators and

barriers to the use of telehealth applications: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Scandinavian journal of caring sciences, 32(1), 24-44. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12445

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018). Systems Implementation [Video file]. Baltimore, MD:

Author.

Laureate Education (Producer). (2018b). Managing Health Information Technology [Video file].

Baltimore, MD: Author.

Mathews, S. C., McShea, M. J., Hanley, C. L., Ravitz, A., Labrique, A. B., & Cohen, A. B.

(2019). Digital health: a path to validation. NPJ digital medicine, 2(1), 1-9.

Magnuson, J. A., & Dixon, B. E. (Eds.). (2020). Public health informatics and information

systems. Springer Nature.

Wager, K. A., Lee, F. W., & Glaser, J. P. (2017). Health care information systems: a practical

approach for health care management. John Wiley & Sons.

McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2018). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Yen, P. Y., Phillips, A., Kennedy, M. K., & Collins, S. (2017). Nursing informatics competency

assessment for the nurse leader: instrument refinement, validation, and psychometric analysis. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 47(5), 271-277. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0000000000000478.

NURS 6051 Week 8 Assignment Workflow Process