Good Evening D
American Association of Nurse Anesthetists (AANA) is a website designed to provide healthcare professionals with the latest and most updated information based on evidence-based practices. according to NURS 6052 Assignment Evidence Based Practice and the Quadruple Aim, AANA adopted the definition, “based on the work of Sackett et al. (2000), the AANA adopted the definition of evidence-based nurse anesthesia practice as “integration and synthesis of the best research evidence with clinical expertise and patient values” in order to optimize the care of patients receiving anesthesia services” (American Association of Nurse Anesthetists, 2020).
The CDC uses EBP in collaboration with other agencies. “One-stop shop for guidelines or recommendations developed by CDC (and CDC collaborations with other organizations and agencies), or by CDC federal advisory committees; includes recommendations, strategies, and information to help decision makers choose courses of action in specific situations (Center for Disease Control, 2019).
This definition appeared in the tab labeled evidenced- based practices within the website. The AANA is grounded in evidenced-based practices because they provide primary sources, first-hand information and information based on research. “Duke University Medical Center defines evidenced-based practices as the integration of clinical expertise, patient values and the best research evidence into the decision-making process for patient care” (“Why choose evidence-based practice?,” 2018). Therefore, we are able to care for our patients properly and effectively with the most innovative technology and medical practices that are available. This information has not changed my perception of the organization, matter of fact it has given me some insight on the duties and responsibilities of the Nurse Anesthetists.
References
American Association of Nurse Anesthetists. (2020). Evidence-based practice. (n.d.). AANA. Retrieved from https://www.aana.com/practice/evidence-based-practice
Why choose evidence-based practice? (2018). American Association of Nurse Practitioners. https://www.aanp.org/news-feed/why-choose-evidence-based-practice
Evidence-based practices. (2019, April 5). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. https://www.cdc.gov/publichealthgateway/program/resources/evidence.html
With increasing healthcare demand, the healthcare system has been advancing drastically over the years, with the introduction of Evidence-based Practice (EBP) for the provision of safe and quality care. Several models such as the triple aim which has evolved to quadruple aim have also been established to promote population health with enhanced patients experience at a reduced cost (Bowles et al., 2018). Healthcare experts believe that the incorporation of EBP into current clinical practice will help reach the Quadruple Aim. As such, the purpose of the present paper is to discuss the quadruple aim and its role in evidence-based practice.
EBP and the Quadruple Aim on Patient Experience
The quadruple aim is focused on the creation of better care output among patients, at a reduced cost, with an improved experience for both the patient and the healthcare provider. With EBP, all the four measures of the quadruple aim can be achieved. For instance, utilization of EBP in the delivery of care and decision-making process on the most appropriate intervention promotes the experience of the patient, with improved care outcome (Haverfield et al., 2020). Patients tend to feel safe when clinicians utilize evidence-based treatment approaches when taking care of them.
EBP and the Quadruple Aim on Population Health
Concerning population health, EBP promotes the utilization of research in better understanding the characteristics, values, needs, and preferences of a certain population, which are key elements in care delivery. For instance, common chronic illnesses such as diabetes and cardiovascular conditions have posed great challenges over the years, with increasing morbidity and mortality rates (Wagner et al., 2018). However, EBP, through research has led to the introduction of novel approaches which are time efficient and easily accessible helping populations with the highest prevalence of these comorbidities hence promoting the achievement of the quadruple aim.
EBP and the Quadruple Aim on Healthcare Cost
Additionally, with the introduction of EBP, clinicians have reported improved prognosis of several health complications with has reduced hospitalization rate hence reduced healthcare costs. Consequently, the use of proven diagnostic tools and treatment approaches has led to a reduced treatment period, hence reducing the costs associated with diagnostic tests and medication (Haverfield et al., 2020). Clinicians have also been trained to utilize cost-effective care approaches and avoid unnecessary procedures to help reach the quadruple aim.
EBP and the Quadruple Aim on Work-Life of Healthcare Providers
Lastly, despite EBP promoting patient-centered care, the experience of the healthcare workforce has also been considered for optimal care benefits. As the fourth element of the quadruple aim, EBP has ensured that clinicians are adequately trained to utilize time-saving and effective medical tools, to improve the efficiency of the care process (Haverfield et al., 2020). The current healthcare system has introduced several interventions through EBP to decrease provider burnouts, stress, and depression which would otherwise lead to poor health outcomes and decreased patient satisfaction.
Conclusion
The healthcare system has evolved over the years towards the provision of safe and quality services. Currently, clinicians are encouraged to utilize EBP in care provision to improve the quality and efficiency of care provided at a reduced cost (Wagner et al., 2018). In the same line, the quadruple aim which evolved recently from the triple aim focuses on four main elements which can be achieved with the incorporation of EBP into current clinical practice.
References
Bowles, J. R., Adams, J. M., Batcheller, J., Zimmermann, D., & Pappas, S. (2018). The role of the nurse leader in advancing the Quadruple Aim. Nurse Leader, 16(4), 244-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mnl.2018.05.011
Haverfield, M. C., Tierney, A., Schwartz, R., Bass, M. B., Brown-Johnson, C., Zionts, D. L., … & Zulman, D. M. (2020). Can Patient-Provider Interpersonal Interventions Achieve the Quadruple Aim of Healthcare? A Systematic Review. Journal of general internal medicine, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-019-05525-2
Wagner, E. H., LeRoy, L., Schaefer, J., Bailit, M., Coleman, K., Zhan, C., & Meyers, D. (2018). How do innovative primary care practices achieve the quadruple aim?. The Journal of ambulatory care management, 41(4), 288-297. DOI: 10.1097/JAC.0000000000000249
As the demand for quality, accessible, and patient-centered care increases, healthcare providers must develop inventive interventions to address patients’ needs. They must also broaden their focus to ensure that disease-causing elements are avoided and populations play an active role in illness prevention. Accordingly, evidence-based practice (EBP) application is inevitable since it integrates the best scientific evidence, patient preferences and clinical proficiency to enhance patient care (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). An EBP’s approach to healthcare delivery helps to reach the Quadruple Aim since it positively impacts the Aim’s measures primarily patient experience and population health. It is also instrumental in reducing costs and promoting the work-life of healthcare professionals.
EBP and Patient Experience
From a practice viewpoint, EBP prompts healthcare professionals to translate scientific findings into practice. As a key component of the Quadruple Aim, patient experience includes general satisfaction with healthcare services and improving outcomes as situations necessitate (Valaitis et al., 2020). Translating research findings into practice improves patient experience since healthcare providers learn and implement innovative ways of addressing patient needs. It enables healthcare professionals to apply relevant and up-to-date strategies in healthcare delivery as they focus on patient-centeredness and holism among other practices that impact care positively to enhance the patient experience.
EBP and Population Health
An EBP approach to care and health promotion is integral to improving population health. Giving the example of the response towards COVID-19 pandemic, Van Bavel et al. (2020) observed that evidence-based public health practices are characterized by implementing effective programs and policies based on scientific reasoning. In public health, scientific reasoning includes an in-depth evaluation of population needs, systematic data use, and applying appropriate theories. Health promotion programs and policies, awareness programs, and strategies to promote equitable access to care respond directly to people’s needs (Van Bavel et al., 2020). They apply scientific reasoning since they evaluate data to determine the extent of populations’ needs depending on locations, cultures, and social class, among other determinants.
Costs
In today’s practice, healthcare providers face a significant challenge to provide optimal patient while utilizing the least resources possible. To address this challenge, EBP enables healthcare providers to apply cost-effective approaches in healthcare delivery including recent healthcare technologies and treatment methods. For instance, telehealth reduces distance and cost of care by eliminating avoidable physical visits to providers (Snoswell et al., 2020). Increased focus on preventive care reduces the treatment costs, which reduces the overall healthcare costs.
EBP and the Work-Life of Healthcare Providers
An EBP approach to care recommends practices that help to create a favorable work environment for healthcare providers. Evidence shows that conducive work environments characterized by the support of healthcare providers and interprofessional collaboration improve the health of healthcare providers (Hlongwa & Rispel, 2021). Scientific evidence further shows healthcare managers how to enhance staff productivity and ensure that they stay physically and mentally healthy. A healthy workforce is integral for quality healthcare hence the need to ensure that healthcare providers are satisfied and with a positive mindset.
Conclusion
EBP is a practical problem-solving approach pivotal in achieving the Quadruple AIM in health practice. By utilizing EBP’s central components, healthcare providers can improve overall patient experience, public health, and the work-life of healthcare professionals. An EBP approach also enables healthcare providers to apply cost-effective interventions in healthcare delivery. Achieving these goals aligns with the general purpose of the Quadruple Aim which looks forward to promoting health among patients and across populations.
References
Hlongwa, P., & Rispel, L. C. (2021).Interprofessional collaboration among health professionals in cleft lip and palate treatment and care in the public health sector of South Africa. Human resources for health, 19(1), 1-9.
Melnyk, B. M., &Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018).Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (4th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
Snoswell, C. L., Taylor, M. L., Comans, T. A., Smith, A. C., Gray, L. C., &Caffery, L. J. (2020). Determining if telehealth can reduce health system costs: Scoping review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(10), e17298.doi: https://doi.org/10.2196/17298
Valaitis, R. K., Wong, S. T., MacDonald, M., Martin-Misener, R., O’Mara, L., Meagher-Stewart, D., …& Savage, R. (2020). Addressing quadruple aims through primary care and public health collaboration: ten Canadian case studies. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08610-y
Van Bavel, J. J., Baicker, K., Boggio, P. S., Capraro, V., Cichocka, A., Cikara, M., … &Willer, R. (2020). Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(5), 460-471. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Content
Name: NURS_6052_Module01_Week01_Assignment_Rubric
Grid View
List View
Excellent Good Fair Poor
Write a brief analysis of the connection between evidence-based practice and the Quadruple Aim. Your analysis should address how evidence-based practice might (or might not) help reach the Quadruple Aim, including each of the four measures of:
· Patient experience
· Population health
· Costs
· Work life of healthcare providers
Points Range: 77 (77%) – 85 (85%)
The analysis clearly and accurately addresses in detail how evidence-based practice either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim.
The analysis accurately and thoroughly explains in detail how the four measures of patient experience, population health, costs, and work-life of healthcare providers either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim.
according to NURS 6052 Assignment Evidence Based Practice and the Quadruple Aim, the analysis provides a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two outside resources reviewed on the four measures supporting or not supporting the Quadruple Aim. The response fully integrates at least two outside resources and two or three course-specific resources that fully support the analysis provided with credible and detailed examples.
Points Range: 68 (68%) – 76 (76%)
The analysis accurately addresses how evidence-based practice either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim.
The analysis accurately explains how the four measures of patient experience, population health, and work life of healthcare providers either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim.
The analysis provides an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource reviewed on the four measures supporting or not supporting the Quadruple Aim. The response integrates at least 1 outside resource and two or three course-specific resources that may support the analysis provided and may include some detailed examples.
Points Range: 60 (60%) – 67 (67%)
The analysis inaccurately or vaguely addresses how evidence-based practice either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim.
The analysis inaccurately or vaguely explains how the four measures of patient experience, population health, and work life of healthcare providers either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim.
The analysis provides an inaccurate or vague analysis of the four measures supporting or not supporting the Quadruple Aim with a vague or inaccurate analysis of outside resources. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the analysis provided and may include vague or inaccurate examples.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 59 (59%)
The analysis inaccurately and vaguely addresses how evidence-based practice either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim or is missing.
The analysis inaccurately and vaguely explains how the four measures of patient experience, population health, and work life of healthcare providers either supports or does not support the Quadruple Aim or is missing.
The analysis provides a vague and inaccurate analysis of the four measures supporting or not supporting the Quadruple Aim with a vague and inaccurate analysis of outside resources. The response fails to integrate any resources to support the analysis provided or is missing.
Written Expression and Formatting—Paragraph Development and Organization:
Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. Assignment: Evidence-Based Practice and the Quadruple Aim
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.
A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated yet is brief and not descriptive.
Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60–79% of the time.
Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing
