NURS 6052 Week 3 Assignment Evidence-Based Project, Part 1 Identifying Research Methodologies
NURS 6052 Week 3 Assignment Evidence-Based Project, Part 1 Identifying Research Methodologies
NURS 6052 Week 3 Assignment Evidence-Based Project, Part 1 Identifying Research Methodologies
Matrix Worksheet Template
Need for Psychological Assistance to Healthcare Professionals who deal with COVID 19 Patients.
Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NURS 6052 Week 3 Assignment Evidence-Based Project, Part 1 Identifying Research Methodologies completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW
Use this document to complete Part 2 of the Module 2 Assessment, Evidence-Based Project, Part 1: An Introduction to Clinical Inquiry and Part 2: Research Methodologies
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6052 Week 3 Assignment Evidence-Based Project, Part 1 Identifying Research Methodologies
| Full citation of selected article | Article #1 | Article #2 | Article #3 | Article #4 |
|
Alikhani, R., Salimi, A., Hormati, A., & Aminnejad, R. (2020). Mental health advice for frontline healthcare providers caring for patients with COVID-19. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, 67(8), 1068-1069. |
Billings, J., Abou Seif, N., Hegarty, S., Ondruskova, T., Soulios, E., Bloomfield, M., & Greene, T. (2021). What support do frontline workers want? A qualitative study of health and social care workers’ experiences and views of psychosocial support during the COVID-19 pandemic. PloS one, 16(9), e0256454. | Chersich, M. F., Gray, G., Fairlie, L., Eichbaum, Q., Mayhew, S., Allwood, B., … & Rees, H. (2020). COVID-19 in Africa: care and protection for frontline healthcare workers. Globalization and health, 16, 1-6. | Nguyen, L. H., Drew, D. A., Joshi, A. D., Guo, C. G., Ma, W., Mehta, R. S., … & COPE Consortium. (2020). Risk of COVID-19 among frontline healthcare workers. MedRxiv. | |
| Why you chose this article and/or how it relates to the clinical issue of interest (include a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest) |
The healthcare teams have always been at the frontline of the battle against the coronavirus pandemic since it was reported as a global concern. The emphasis of standardized criteria has been on keeping these teams safe from infections and bodily injury. There is considerably less information to help Alikhani et al. (2020) safeguard their teams’ mental health. Operating under duress in a high-stress job is exhausting even when things are going well. I choose to review this article because patients and their healthcare professionals will benefit from interventions that reduce tiredness, burnout, especially medical errors. All healthcare personnel must collaborate for a better change. |
I chose to incorporate this article since the importance of assisting frontline workers’ mental health has recently been recognized within the article. Unfortunately, there has been little study on effectively serving frontline professionals’ psychosocial needs—neither one according to their own experiences and perspectives on what may be most appropriate. | I chose to utilize this source because, while the medical personnel care for their COVID-19 patients, they experience emotional and physical fatigue, isolation from their families, stigma, and the grief of losing patients or their coworkers. The virus has infected many of them, and several have died as a result. There are severe deficiencies in response capability in Africa, where the disease is spreading, particularly human resources and personal protective gear.
Due to global competition, Africa’s supply of protective gear is restricted (Chersich et al., 2020). Low-cost treatments like facemasks for coughing patients and proper handwashing equipment, as well as ‘physical distance’ in packed public healthcare facilities, might be difficult. COVID-19 deaths among healthcare workers in Africa can be significant if sufficient protection is not provided due to a lack of critical care units and problems transferring ill healthcare practitioners from villages to city treatment centers. |
Over 40 million occurrences of COVID-19 have already been recorded worldwide as of 2020, with nearly 270,000 fatalities (Nguyen et al., 2020). The prevalence of this illness was anticipated to grow within the initial weeks due to continuous community infection from asymptomatic persons. The constant use of prescribed PPE is important to minimizing infection based on experience with other infections transmitted by respiratory secretions. |
| Brief description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article | According to Alikhani et al. (2020), research under this topic would establish countrywide psychological support hotlines to aid healthcare practitioners during the pandemic. Evidence-based assessments and mental health therapies aimed at frontline medical practitioners, on the other hand, are in short supply (Alikhani et al., 2020). The goal of this research was to examine psychological wellbeing across health care professionals treating COVID-19 victims by assessing the severity of depression, anxiety, sleeplessness, and discomfort symptoms and identifying possible risk factors linked with some of these symptoms.
|
The sole goal of this research was to research the most effective intervention for health care workers (Billings et al., 2021). They set out to fill this study gap by systematically investigating the experiences and perspectives of UK frontline social and health care professionals on psychological assistance throughout the epidemic.
|
In an epidemic, African healthcare professional confront significant obstacles, and this was the main research aim. Chersich et al. (2020) offer ten high-priority actions in Africa to protect frontline health professionals. The epidemic in Africa, and its long-term effects on social security, economic prosperity, and safety, will be shaped by how successfully we preserve their physical and mental health as there are several objectives for the COVID-19 action on the region, Chersich et al. (2020) strongly encourage WHO, federal governments, the corporate sector, and also the general public to focus on health – care workers protection and psychological wellbeing.
|
Since data regarding frontline health professionals and risk of covid 19 infections are sparse and whether protective equipment lessens this hazard is uncertain. Nguyen et al. (2020) looked at the danger of COVID-19 among active Healthcare staff versus the general public and the impact of personal protective equipment. Healthcare practitioners on the front lines exhibited a considerably higher risk of infection. The risk was greatest among those who reused their gear or had insufficient access to protective protection equipment. Appropriate protective equipment supplies, on the other hand, did not entirely prevent high-risk exposures.
|
| Brief description of the research methodology used Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific. |
This study utilized a qualitative research method of data collection. Alikhani et al. (2020) seem to be more interested in qualitative research’s validity, applicability, and dependability than consistency. They engaged several researchers in the data collecting, coding, and analysis procedures to enhance the validity of their findings by questioning their preconceptions and uncovering potential ‘weak points’ that they could have had with relation to this issue. First, before the trial began, the Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University’s clinical research and ethics committee gave its approval. Before being enrolled in the survey, every participant gave verbally informed permission.
 Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?Get your assignment on NURS 6052 Week 3 Assignment Evidence-Based Project, Part 1 Identifying Research Methodologies done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
|
The research employed the mixed method of data collection under its methodology. Frontline social and health care employees were purposefully recruited using social platforms and non – random sampling among healthcare colleagues. Participants who agreed to participate in the research were interviewed using a semi-structured interview protocol over the phone (Billings et al., 2021). The study team used the techniques of Reflexive Thematic Analysis to analyze the interview transcripts.
|
Here, a qualitative approach of data collection method was utilized. Studies were selected to provide data and analysis on the dangers of infection and psychological health that healthcare professionals experienced during the pandemic. Research also took place in a variety of settings (Chersich et al., 2020). Publications about the COVID-19 epidemic in Africa, in general, were also incorporated. Publications on infection prevention and control or psychological health in the pandemic were equally essential; therefore, they were included in this study.
|
Here, to conduct this research, quantitative research methods were used. This large prospective study was also conducted through using COVID 19 Symptom Research software, a smartphone app developed by Zoe Global Company limited in partnership with Massachusetts General Hospital as well as King’s College in London that provides participants with a directed interface to reveal a variety of benchmark demographic and comorbidity information, along with everyday information on prospective symptoms.
|
| A brief description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected. |
The strength of the qualitative research methodology employed has many implications. This qualitative research included reflexivity, which allows readers to assess the validity of the findings by learning more about the research team that created them (Alikhani et al., 2020). This team is comprised of a varied collection of researchers from various career phases, clinical specialties, genders, and a variety of backgrounds. Therefore, the ethical standards in the research methodology were upheld to the latter. |
According to the findings of this research, frontline social and health care professionals are likely to require a flexible social support system that includes peer, organizational, and professional assistance. Therefore, this demonstrates that the research methodology was adhered to and the most appropriate data was collected. More study is needed to completely understand the structural, institutional, and individual obstacles to receiving psychological help (Billings et al., 2021). It is necessary to increase collaboration, engagement, and co-production of support programs and their assessment. | One of the important strengths of the research methodology in this article is that appropriate measures inside health institutions can reduce the risk of infection among healthcare workers. This mostly entails using safety equipment, such as gowns, gloves, masks, and eyewear. Careful wearing and personal protective equipment are still crucial defenses, but they need extensive training and supervision. | The app was released in the United Kingdom in March 2020 and then in the United States in March 2020 (Nguyen et al., 2020). Participants were found through social media network outreach and invite to study volunteers from the researchers of long-running prospective studies. Participants gave informed permission to use aggregated data for research purposes and approved the privacy policy and use requirements at the time of enrolment (Nguyen et al., 2020). The London Ethics Committee approved this observational study. |
| General Notes/Comments | There is considerably less information to help Alikhani et al. (2020) safeguard their teams’ mental health. | In this article, the COVID-19 virus has had a major impact on frontline social and health care professionals’ psychological health and overall wellbeing. | Authors in this article encountered these issues and made recommendations on how to protect health professionals from emotional and physical fatigue, isolation from their families, stigma, and the grief of losing patients or their coworkers. | Because there is limited data on frontline health personnel and COVID 19 infections, it is unclear if protective equipment can reduce the risk. |
|
Matrix Worksheet Template
Use this document to complete Part 2 of the Module 2 Assessment, Evidence-Based Project, Part 1: An Introduction to Clinical Inquiry and Part 2: Research Methodologies
There are different clinical issues facing healthcare today. There are different research processes that have been done to enable healthcare professionals to understand these issues and identify new or various strategies on how to solve them. One of the main clinical issues that is experienced in the healthcare today is medication errors.
| Full citation of selected article | Article #1 | Article #2 | Article #3 | Article #4 |
| Salmasi, S., Wimmer, B.C., Khan, T. M., Patel, R.P., & Ming, L.C. (2018). Quantitative Exploration of Medication errors among older people: a systematic review. Drugs & Therapy Perspectives, 34(3), 129-137. doi: 10.1007/s40267-017-0468-9. | Jember, A., Hailu, M., Messele, A., Demeke, T., Hassen, M. (2018). Proportion of Medication Error Reporting and Associated Factors among Nurses: A Cross Sectional Study. BMC nursing, 17(1), 9. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-018-0280-4 | Salar, A., F., & Rezaee, N. (2020). Preventing the Medication Errors in Hospitals: A qualitative Study. International Journal of African Nursing Sciences, 13, 100235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijans.2020.100235 | Alomari, A., Sheppard-Law, S., Lewis, J., & Wilson, V. (2020). Effectiveness of Clinical Nurse’s Interventions in Reducing Medication Errors in the Pediatric Ward. Journal of Clinical Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15374 | |
| Why you chose this article and/or how it relates to the clinical issue of interest (include a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest) |
The above article presents an elaborate research process on the medication errors often encountered in the healthcare processes. In other words, the article was chosen because it provides a comprehensive analysis of the medication errors, causes and the approaches that can be applied to remedy the situation. Confidentiality of information is one of the ethical approach that was applied in the above research process. |
The information contained in the article provides ideal information on clinical issue under the study. In other words, it is associated with the medication error reporting. The choice of this article was considered because a lot of information concerning the clinical issue under consideration can be drawn from it. |
The article was chosen because it contains elaborate information about the prevention of medication errors arising from different situations. It also consists of a well-researched information on the possible causes of medication errors in different clinical processes. This information is useful when it comes to understanding of the clinical issue under consideration. |
The article was chosen because it contains elaborate information concerning the roles of nurses or the effectiveness of nurse’s interventions in reducing medication errors in the course of treatment. The article incorporates confidentiality of the information in the course of the research to enhance ethical consideration in the research processes. |
| Brief description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article |
The main objective of the research was to systematically analyze or review studies on the cases or categories of medication errors among the older generation. The secondary objective was to analyze the clinical and economic consequences of the medication errors in older people as well as the medications involved.
|
The main objective or purpose of the article is to establish the proportion of medication error reporting as well as the associated factors among nurses in different healthcare institutions.
|
The main objective of the qualitative research article is to establish measures that can be used to prevent medication errors in different healthcare processes. |
The objective of the research is to evaluate the interventions that have been developed and implemented by the nurses to reduce medication error rates and enhance nurse’s medication administration practices.
|
| Brief description of the research methodology used Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific. | The method used in the research process was quantitative. The data was obtained from the databases and different statistical analyses were performed to ensure accurate outcomes. Descriptive statistics was used to show some of the attributes of the variable used. Also, the systematic sampling process used showed that the study was quantitative. The survey method is one of the methodologies that have been applied in the research process.
|
The research paper is a quantitative cross sectional study. The researchers attempt to measure the outcomes versus the exposure. Stratified sampling method was also used to identify the study respondents. | Qualitative research methodology was used in the research process to establish the information required on the preventive measures that can be undertaken to reduce medication errors in the process of treatments. | Quantitative research methodology was used in the investigation processes. There was the collection and analysis of data from the healthcare settings. Specifically, this was an Action Research (AR), a three‐phase quantitative study. |
| A brief description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected. |
One of the strengths of the survey methodology was the accuracy of the information being obtained for the research processes. The methodology applied enhanced validity and reliability of the research process. In most cases, survey approaches are important when a researcher wants to ensure reliability, validity, and applicability of the research processes. |
The strength of the quantitative cross-sectional study is based on the ability to apply mixed methods to establish valid and reliable statistical outcomes in the process of data analysis. The reliability and validity were applied to enhance the accuracy and confidence in the research outcomes. |
The strength of the research methodology used relies on the ability to establish a well-researched information concerning the medication errors. The approaches used are reliable and valid when it comes to the establishment of effective preventive measures for the medication errors. |
The strength in the methodology applied depends on the application of the primary data to enhance the understanding of the interventions that have been developed and implemented by the nurses to reduce medication error rates. |
| General Notes/Comments |
The quantitative research article provides ideal information that is needed to understand the problems associated with the medication errors. Also, the approaches used in the article are important in ensuring validity and reliability of the research processes. |
The research article provides effective outcomes when it comes to the understanding of the medication errors in different healthcare settings. | The qualitative research article provides ideal measures that can be followed to prevent or reduce medication errors in the course of treatment. The information provided is ideal in enhancing the understanding of the approaches that can be undertaken to significantly reduce medication errors in the healthcare processes. | The methodology applied in the article leads to the provisions of reliable and valid information required in the understanding of the interventions that have been developed and implemented by the nurses to reduce medication error rates. |
References
Alomari, A., Sheppard-Law, S., Lewis, J., & Wilson, V. (2020). Effectiveness of Clinical Nurse’s Interventions in Reducing Medication Errors in the Pediatric Ward. Journal of Clinical Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15374
Jember, A., Hailu, M., Messele, A., Demeke, T., Hassen, M. (2018). Proportion of Medication Error Reporting and Associated Factors among Nurses: A Cross Sectional Study. BMC nursing, 17(1), 9. DOI: 10.1186/s12912-018-0280-4
Salar, A., F., & Rezaee, N. (2020). Preventing the Medication Errors in Hospitals: A qualitative Study. International Journal of African Nursing Sciences, 13, 100235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijans.2020.100235
Salmasi, S., Wimmer, B.C., Khan, T. M., Patel, R.P., & Ming, L.C. (2018). Quantitative Exploration of Medication errors among older people: a systematic review. Drugs & Therapy Perspectives, 34(3), 129-137. doi: 10.1007/s40267-017-0468-9.
Matrix Worksheet Template
Need for Psychological Assistance to Healthcare Professionals who deal with COVID 19 Patients.
Use this document to complete Part 2 of the Module 2 Assessment, Evidence-Based Project, Part 1: An Introduction to Clinical Inquiry and Part 2: Research Methodologies
| Full citation of selected article | Article #1 | Article #2 | Article #3 | Article #4 |
|
Alikhani, R., Salimi, A., Hormati, A., & Aminnejad, R. (2020). Mental health advice for frontline healthcare providers caring for patients with COVID-19. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, 67(8), 1068-1069. |
Billings, J., Abou Seif, N., Hegarty, S., Ondruskova, T., Soulios, E., Bloomfield, M., & Greene, T. (2021). What support do frontline workers want? A qualitative study of health and social care workers’ experiences and views of psychosocial support during the COVID-19 pandemic. PloS one, 16(9), e0256454. | Chersich, M. F., Gray, G., Fairlie, L., Eichbaum, Q., Mayhew, S., Allwood, B., … & Rees, H. (2020). COVID-19 in Africa: care and protection for frontline healthcare workers. Globalization and health, 16, 1-6. | Nguyen, L. H., Drew, D. A., Joshi, A. D., Guo, C. G., Ma, W., Mehta, R. S., … & COPE Consortium. (2020). Risk of COVID-19 among frontline healthcare workers. MedRxiv. | |
| Why you chose this article and/or how it relates to the clinical issue of interest (include a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest) |
The healthcare teams have always been at the frontline of the battle against the coronavirus pandemic since it was reported as a global concern. The emphasis of standardized criteria has been on keeping these teams safe from infections and bodily injury. There is considerably less information to help Alikhani et al. (2020) safeguard their teams’ mental health. Operating under duress in a high-stress job is exhausting even when things are going well. I choose to review this article because patients and their healthcare professionals will benefit from interventions that reduce tiredness, burnout, especially medical errors. All healthcare personnel must collaborate for a better change. |
I chose to incorporate this article since the importance of assisting frontline workers’ mental health has recently been recognized within the article. Unfortunately, there has been little study on effectively serving frontline professionals’ psychosocial needs—neither one according to their own experiences and perspectives on what may be most appropriate. | I
|