NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Lab Assignment Assessing the Abdomen
NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Lab Assignment Assessing the Abdomen
NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Lab Assignment Assessing the Abdomen
Abdominal Assessment
Abdominal problems have adverse effects on the health and wellbeing of the patients. Nurses are expected to utilize their knowledge and skills in comprehensive history taking and patient assessment to develop accurate diagnoses and treatment plans for their patients. Therefore, this paper is an examination of J.R’s case study. J.R is a 47-year-old client that has come to the hospital with generalized abdominal pain for the last three days and nausea. The purpose of this paper is to examine the additional subjective and objective information to be obtained from the client, whether the case study has subjective and objective data, diagnostic investigations, and decision related to the developed diagnosis.
Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Lab Assignment Assessing the Abdomen completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW
Analysis of Subjective Portion
Subjective data relates to that obtained from the patient. It focuses on the experiences of the patient with the health problem. Additional subjective information should be obtained from the patient to come up with an accurate diagnosis and treatment plan. One of the subjective data that should be obtained from the client is quantification of the abdominal pain. Information about the pain rating, severity, character, and relieving, precipitating, and aggravating factors should be obtained. The other aspect of the pain should focus on whether the pain is generalized, radiating to other body parts, or increasing or decreasing in intensity. The pain should also be described in terms of whether it is sudden or gradual.
Moreover, the nature of diarrhea that the client reports should also be quantified. A focus should be placed on aspects such as the frequency of the diarrhea in a given period to determine if they client is dehydrated or not. The additional information about diarrhea include color of stool, relieving, aggravating, and precipitating factors. The provider should also obtain information about the dietary history of the client. Food poisoning could be a factor to consider in this client’s case.
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Lab Assignment Assessing the Abdomen done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
As a result, information about recent dietary habits and perceived hygiene of the foods should be obtained to determine the cause of the problem. The hygiene status and source of water that the client drinks should be obtained to ascertain whether the problem is a water-borne disease. Since the client has history of gastrointestinal bleeding, it would be necessary to ask about recent changes in color, smell, and texture of the stool prior to the current problems (Jarvis & Eckhardt, 2019). Such information will aid in ruling out causes such as ulcers of the gastrointestinal system.
Analysis of Objective Position
Healthcare providers obtain objective data using methods such as observation, palpation, percussion, and auscultation. The data is important in confirming or validating the subjective data given by the patient. Additional objective data should be obtained from the client. They include the general appearance of the client during the first encounter with the healthcare provider. The healthcare provider should provide a description of the grooming, energy levels, body weight, and if the patient is dehydrated or not. The provider should have also assessed the patient for hydration status and jaundice by checking on skin turgor and sclera for jaundice.
The patient should have also provided comprehensive abdominal assessment to determine whether there is distention, bowel movements, organomegally, distention of veins, and scars. The provider should have also palpated the abdomen for tenderness, rigidity, or any rebound tenderness. The information could have helped rule out causes such as bowel obstruction and organomegally (Jarvis, 2019). The objective data could have facilitated the development of an accurate diagnosis for the client.
Analysis of the Assessment
Objective and subjective data support the assessment of JR. Examples of subjective data that supports the assessment include information about diarrhea, nausea, stomach pains, past medical, medication, allergies, family, and social histories. Examples of objective data include the vitals and heart, lungs, skin, and abdominal findings.
Diagnostic Tests
Stool test is the most appropriate diagnostic investigation for JR. Stool analysis should be performed to determine if the client has an infection or the cause could be due to gastrointestinal bleeding. Blood tests such as complete blood count are also recommended to determine if the client has low hemoglobin level due to bleeding or elevated white blood cell count to indicate infection. Since the client has a history of gastrointestinal bleeding, it would be appropriate to perform abdominal ultrasound to determine the actual cause of the problem (Jarvis & Eckhardt, 2019).
Rejecting/Accepting the Diagnosis
I would accept the current diagnosis. Patients with gastroenteritis experience symptoms similar to those of JR. The symptoms include abdominal cramps, vomiting, nausea, and diarrhea. The infection is short-term, implying symptom resolution over time. JR reports that the pain severity has declined, implying a potential symptom resolution in gastroenteritis. He also complains of diarrhea, abdominal pain, and nausea, hence, the decision to accept the diagnosis (Bányai et al., 2018). The differential diagnoses to be considered include abdominal obstruction, colon cancer, and inflammatory bowel disease.
The above differentials have patients experiencing either nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, or abdominal pains. However, it may not be abdominal obstruction due to the presence of diarrhea and absence of abdominal distention. Diagnostic investigations such as abdominal ultrasound are needed to rule out colon cancer. The patient does not have any predisposition to environmental triggers, hence, ruling out inflammatory bowel disease (Guan, 2019).
Conclusion
Subjective and objective data guide the diagnoses developed for health problems affecting patients. JR is likely to be suffering from gastroenteritis. Additional subjective and objective data is however needed to develop an accurate diagnosis. Diagnostic investigations should be used to develop accurate diagnosis for the patient.
References
Bányai, K., Estes, M. K., Martella, V., & Parashar, U. D. (2018). Viral gastroenteritis. The Lancet, 392(10142), 175–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31128-0
Guan, Q. (2019). A Comprehensive Review and Update on the Pathogenesis of Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Journal of Immunology Research, 2019, e7247238. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/7247238
Jarvis, C. (2019). Physical Examination & Health Assessment Access Code. Elsevier Health Sciences.
Jarvis, C., & Eckhardt, A. (2019). Physical Examination and Health Assessment. Elsevier.
The assessment is supported by the objective and subjective information. This is observed the patient had stated a history of pain in the stomach. The pain then became worse. The patient sough medical intervention from a hospital though there was no relief. The pain increased in severity until he vomited. Then the patient went to the hospital again until it was identified the patient is experiencing pain in the epigastric region consistent with occurrence of abdominal pain. This all supports the chief complaint. The listed differentials are also relevant as they are conditions affecting the abdominal region hence are in line with what is affecting the patient (Dains & Scheibel, 2019).
A woman went to the emergency room for severe abdominal cramping. She was diagnosed with diverticulitis; however, as a precaution, the doctor ordered a CT scan. The CT scan revealed a growth on the pancreas, which turned out to be pancreatic cancer—the real cause of the cramping.
Because of a high potential for misdiagnosis, determining the precise cause of abdominal pain can be time consuming and challenging. By analyzing case studies of abnormal abdominal findings, nurses can prepare themselves to better diagnose conditions in the abdomen.
In this Lab Assignment NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Lab Assignment Assessing the Abdomen, you will analyze an Episodic note case study that describes abnormal findings in patients seen in a clinical setting. You will consider what history should be collected from the patients as well as which physical exams and diagnostic tests should be conducted. You will also formulate a differential diagnosis with several possible conditions.
To Prepare
Review the Episodic note case study your instructor provides you for this week’s Assignment. Please see the “Course Announcements” section of the classroom for your Episodic note case study.
- With regard to the Episodic note case study provided:
- Review this week’s Learning Resources, and consider the insights they provide about the case study.
- Consider what history would be necessary to collect from the patient in the case study.
- Consider what physical exams and diagnostic tests would be appropriate to gather more information about the patient’s condition. How would the results be used to make a diagnosis?
- Identify at least five possible conditions that may be considered in a differential diagnosis for the patient.
The Assignment
- Analyze the subjective portion of the note. List additional information that should be included in the documentation.
- Analyze the objective portion of the note. List additional information that should be included in the documentation.
- Is the assessment supported by the subjective and objective information? Why or why not?
- What diagnostic tests would be appropriate for this case, and how would the results be used to make a diagnosis?
- Would you reject/accept the current diagnosis? Why or why not? Identify three possible conditions that may be considered as a differential diagnosis for this patient. Explain your reasoning using at least three different references from current evidence-based literature.
By Day 7 of Week 6
Submit your Lab Assignment.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
- Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK6Assgn1+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
- Click the Week 6 Assignment 1 Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
- Click the Week 6 Assignment 1 link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
- Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK6Assgn1+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
- If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
- Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:
Week 6 Assignment 1 Rubric
Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity
To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:
Submit your Week 6 Assignment 1 draft and review the originality report.
Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 6
To participate in this Assignment:
Week 6 Assignment 1
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6512 Assignment 1 Lab Assignment Assessing the Abdomen
Exam: Week 6 Midterm Exam
This exam is a test of your knowledge in preparation for your certification exam. No outside resources, including books, notes, websites, or any other type of resource, are to be used to complete this exam. You are expected to comply with Walden University’s Code of Conduct.
This exam will be on topics covered in weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6. Prior to starting the exam, you should review all of your materials. This exam is timed with a limit of 2 hours for completion. When time is up, your exam will automatically submit.
By Day 7 of Week 6
Submit your Midterm Exam.
Submission and Grading Information
Submit Your Midterm Exam by Day 7 of Week 6.
To Complete this Exam:
Week 6 Exam
Week 6: Assessment of the Abdomen and Gastrointestinal System
On your way home from dinner, you start experiencing sharp pains in your abdomen. You ate seafood—could you have food poisoning? What else might be causing your pain? Appendicitis? Should you head to the emergency room, or should you wait and see how you feel in the morning?
Numerous ailments can affect the GI system and the abdomen. Because the organs are so close, it can
be difficult to conduct an accurate assessment. Also, pain in another area of the body can affect the GI system. For example, patients with chronic migraines often report nausea.
This week, you will explore how to assess the abdomen and gastrointestinal system.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
- Evaluate abnormal abdomen and gastrointestinal findings
- Apply concepts, theories, and principles relating to health assessment techniques and diagnoses for the abdomen and gastrointestinal system
- Analyze chest X-Ray and abdominal X-Ray imaging
- Identify concepts, theories, and principles related to advanced health assessment
Learning Resources
Required Readings (click to expand/reduce)
Ball, J. W., Dains, J. E., Flynn, J. A., Solomon, B. S., & Stewart, R. W. (2019). Seidel’s guide to physical examination: An interprofessional approach (9th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.
- Chapter 6, “Vital Signs and Pain Assessment”This chapter describes the experience of pain and its causes. The authors also describe the process of pain assessment.
- Chapter 18, “Abdomen”In this chapter, the authors summarize the anatomy and physiology of the abdomen. The authors also explain how to conduct an assessment of the abdomen.
Dains, J. E., Baumann, L. C., & Scheibel, P. (2019). Advanced health assessment and clinical diagnosis in primary care (6th ed.). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier Mosby.
Credit Line: Advanced Health Assessment and Clinical Diagnosis in Primary Care, 6th Edition by Dains, J.E., Baumann, L. C., & Scheibel, P. Copyright 2019 by Mosby. Reprinted by permission of Mosby via the Copyright Clearance Center.
Colyar, M. R. (2015). Advanced practice nursing procedures. Philadelphia, PA: F. A. Davis.
Credit Line: Advanced practice nursing procedures, 1st Edition by Colyar, M. R. Copyright 2015 by F. A. Davis Company. Reprinted by permission of F. A. Davis Company via the Copyright Clearance Center.
These sections below explain the procedural knowledge needed to perform gastrointestinal procedures.
Chapter 115, “X-Ray Interpretation of Abdomen” (pp. 514–520)
Note: Download this Student Checklist and Abdomen Key Points to use during your practice abdominal examination.
Document: Midterm Exam Review (Word document)
Optional Resource
LeBlond, R. F., Brown, D. D., & DeGowin, R. L. (2014). DeGowin’s diagnostic examination (10th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill Medical.
- Chapter 9, “The Abdomen, Perineum, Anus, and Rectosigmoid” (pp. 445–527)This chapter explores the health assessment processes for the abdomen, perineum, anus, and rectosigmoid. This chapter also examines the symptoms of many conditions in these areas.
- Chapter 10, “The Urinary System” (pp. 528–540)In this chapter, the authors provide an overview of the physiology of the urinary system. The chapter also lists symptoms and conditions of the urinary system.
Required Media (click to expand/reduce)
Assessment of the Abdomen and Gastrointestinal System – Week 6 (14m)
Online media for Seidel’s Guide to Physical Examination
It is highly recommended that you access and view the resources included with the course text, Seidel’s Guide to Physical Examination. Focus on the videos and animations in Chapter 17 that relate to the assessment of the abdomen and gastrointestinal system. Refer to Week 4 for access instructions on https://evolve.elsevier.com/
The SOAP note concerns a 47-year-old white man with chief complaints of abdominal pain and diarrhea. He has had generalized abdominal pain for three days but has not taken any meds to relieve the pain. He reports that the pain was initially at 9/10 but has reduced to 5/10, and he cannot eat due to ensuing nausea. His medical history is positive for
hypertension, DM, and GI bleeding. GI exam findings include a soft abdomen, hyperactive bowel sounds, and LLQ pain. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the SOAP note, identify appropriate diagnostic tests, and discuss likely diagnoses.
Subjective Portion
The SOAP note’s HPI describes the abdominal pain, including the onset, location, associated symptoms, and severity of pain. Nevertheless, the HPI should have given an additional description of the abdominal pain, particularly the duration of the abdominal pain, timing (before, during, or after meals), and frequency. In addition, the characteristics of the abdominal pain should be included describing if the pain is sharp, crampy, dull, colicky, diffuses, constant, or radiating (Sokic-Milutinovic et al., 2022).
In addition, the HPI should have included the exacerbating and alleviating factors for the abdominal pain and to what level the alleviating factors relieve the pain. Furthermore, the HPI has described only the abdominal pain leaving out diarrhea. It should describe diarrhea, including the onset, timing, frequency, characteristics of the stools (watery, mucoid, bloody, greasy, or malodorous), and relieving and aggravating factors.
The subjective part should have included the patient’s immunization status with a focus on the last Tdap, Influenza, and COVID shots and surgical history. The social history has scanty information and should have included the patient’s education level, occupation, current living status, hobbies, exercise and sleep patterns, dietary habits, and health promotion interventions (Gossman et al., 2020). Lastly, a review of systems (ROS) is mandatory for a SOAP note. Thus, the SOAP note should have a ROS that indicates the pertinent positive and negative symptoms in each body system, which helps identify other symptoms the patient has not reported in the HPI.
Objective Portion
The objective part misses critical information like the findings from the general assessment of the patient, which should include the client’s general appearance, personal hygiene, grooming, dressing, speech, body language, and attitude towards the clinician. In addition, findings from a detailed abdominal exam should have been provided.
For instance, it should have inspection findings, including the abdomen’s pigmentation, respiratory movements, symmetry, contour, and presence of scars. Additional auscultation findings that should be indicated include the presence of friction ribs, vascular sounds, and venous hum. It should also have exam findings from palpation and percussion, including abdominal tenderness, masses, organomegaly, guarding, or rebound tenderness (Sokic-Milutinovic et al., 2022). Besides, the liver span and spleen position should be indicated.
Assessment
The assessment findings identified in the SOAP note are Left lower quadrant (LLQ) pain and gastroenteritis (GE). LLQ pain is supported by subjective findings of abdominal pain and LLQ tenderness on exam. GE is consistent with subjective data of diarrhea, abdominal pain, and nausea and objective data of low-grade fever of 99.8 and hyperactive bowel sounds, which are classic symptoms.
Diagnostic Tests
The appropriate diagnostic tests for this patient are stool culture, complete blood count (CBC), and abdominal ultrasound. A stool culture is crucial to look for ova and cyst, which will help establish the causative agent for diarrhea and guide the treatment plan. Based on the WBC count, the CBC will establish if the patient has an infection and if the infection is bacterial or viral (Sokic-Milutinovic et al., 2022). The abdominal ultrasound will be used to visualize abdominal organs and identify if there is inflammation that could be contributing to the patient’s GI symptoms.
Differential Diagnoses
I would accept the GE diagnosis because it is consistent with the patient’s clinical features of diarrhea, generalized abdominal pain, nausea, low-grade fever, hyperactive bowel sounds, and abdominal tenderness. Nevertheless, I would reject LLQ pain as a diagnosis because it is a physical exam finding and does not fit the description of a medical diagnosis. The likely diagnoses for this case are:
Acute Viral Gastroenteritis
Viral GE is an acute, self-limiting diarrheal disease caused by viruses. The common causative viruses are rotavirus, norovirus, enteric adenovirus, and astroviruses. Clinical manifestations include anorexia, nausea, vomiting, watery diarrhea, abdominal pain/tenderness (mild to moderate), low-grade fever, dehydration, and hyperactive bowel sounds (Orenstein, 2020). Acute Viral GE is a presumptive diagnosis due to the patient’s clinical manifestations of nausea, diarrhea, abdominal pain, mild fever, abdominal tenderness on palpation, and hyperactive bowel sounds.
Ulcerative Colitis (UC)
UC is a chronic inflammatory and ulcerative GI disorder that occurs in the colonic mucosa and is characterized by bloody diarrhea. Clinical symptoms include mild lower abdominal pain, bloody diarrhea, and bloody mucoid stools. Systemic manifestations include anorexia, nausea, fever, malaise, anemia, and weight loss (Porter et al., 2020). The patient’s positive findings of nausea, diarrhea, abdominal pain, and mild fever, as well as a history of GI bleeding, makes UC a likely diagnosis.
Colonic Diverticulitis
Diverticulitis presents with inflammation of a diverticulum with the presence or absence of infection. Abdominal pain is the primary symptom of colonic diverticulitis. Patients present with LLQ abdominal pain and tenderness, which can sometimes be suprapubic and often have a palpable sigmoid. The abdominal pain is usually accompanied by fever, nausea, vomiting, and occasionally urinary symptoms (Swanson & Strate,