Patients Transparency Discussion HCA 675

Patients Transparency Discussion HCA 675

Patients Transparency Discussion HCA 675

Customizing patients care to the needs of an individual patient and standardized patient care are two conflicting ways of attending to patients. Normally, customizing is the basis for patient care and must be practiced every day everywhere (Suhonen, Stolt, & Papastavrou, 2019). On the other hand, standardizing care is the basis for communication in a multidisciplinary team and should be practiced only for complex circumstances. According to Suhonen et al. (2019), customizing patient care to the needs of individual patients focuses on addressing the uniqueness of particular patients revealed by their genetic composition. This is opposed to the standardization of patient care that does not acknowledge the unique differences in people. Customizing patient care to the needs of individuals, therefore, ensures that the specific needs of patients are properly addressed and effective medication is provided, whereas, standardized care perceive patients as general (Suhonen et al., 2019). Medications and individualized care provided under standardized care may not be compatible with the individual unique traits.

Normally, standardized patient care uses the basis provided by a particular approach or regulations. In situations where the approaches do not work, the doctor can narrow down to customized care to address problems specific to the patient (Kurth & Morton, 2013). Experts suggest that standardized patient care is cost-effective and labor-saving as opposed to customized care.  Also, standardized care can eliminate unnecessary work for physicians (Suhonen et al., 2019). Additionally, customizing patient care to individual needs provides patients with the autonomy to participate in their healthcare journey. In contrary, standardized care deprives patients their autonomy and as such, they are only left with one option, which is to follow rules and instructions provided by the physician (Suhonen et al., 2019). All in all, both customizing patient care to individual needs and standardizing care aim at improving patients’ health conditions and should be implemented where necessary.

References

Kurth, C. D., & Morton, N. (2013). Introducing quality improvement. Pediatric Anesthesia, 23(7), 569–570. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1111/pan.12167

Suhonen, R., Stolt, M., & Papastavrou, E. (2019). Individualized Care. Berlin, Germany: Springer International Publishing.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: Patients Transparency Discussion HCA 675

What are the risks of revealing mistakes in an open culture, as a way of being transparent with patients and families? What are the risks of concealing mistakes and errors?

What do you see as the conflicts between customizing patient care to the needs of an individual patient and standardizing care based on research?

Discuss the concept of “waste” from the Deming perspective. How do you think it could apply to hospitals and other health care entities?

Given the different perspectives on change by those who like it and those who dread it, discuss how you would develop readiness for change in a group that mixes both types of people.

There can be several pertinent conflicts between customizing patient care to the needs of an individual and standardizing care based on research. Standardization of care stems from evidenced-based medicine (EBM) and uses research to establish clinical practice guidelines (Ansmann & Pfaff, 2018). While this is accepted by the majority of providers and organizations as an effective way to conduct care, there are several concerns around using standardized medicine for all populations. Ansmann & Pfaff (2018) discuss these concerns, which include that precision medicine has increased with technology and diagnostics, there is an increase in multimorbid patients that are not accounted for in standard practice guidelines, and there is increase in shared decision-making. These growing trends are not supported by EBM, yet are with personalized and individualized care. Tailoring care to the patient based on psychosocial, cultural, and patient preferences can be defined as customized medicine (Ansmann & Pfaff). This is slightly different from personalized medicine, which is the “adaptation of treatment to the biological dimensions of the patient’s body” (Ansmann & Pfaff, 2018, p. 349). It appears that the benefits of a customized approach can include personalization of treatment, which aligns with the precision medicine trend. Overall, the conflicts between these approaches will like grow as technology advances and population trends change. A good solution may be to continue evidenced-based research but start to include factors that are more present in today’s population.

Reference

Ansmann, L., & Pfaff, H. (2018). Providers and Patients Caught Between Standardization and Individualization: Individualized Standardization as a Solution Comment on “(Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare”. International journal of health policy and management, 7(4), 349–352. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2017.95

HCA 675 Grand Canyon Week 5 Discussion 1

You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.

Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.

Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.

The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.