Performance Appraisal and Human Resource Management Essay
Performance Appraisal and Human Resource Management Essay
Florida National University HSA-6142 Health Care Human Resources Management Week 6 Organization Analysis: Chapters 14 & 15 Objective: Organization Analysis: For this assignment, you will describe and analyze your organizational setting and context, setting the stage for the job analysis and performance appraisal process. The paper will be 4 pages long. More information and due date will provide in the Sixth Week assignments link. ASSIGNMENT GUIDELINES (10%): 1) You are expected to describe your agency or organization, ideally your field practicum. This description will serve as the beginning of your other assignments (job analysis and performance appraisals). 2) Develop a 4-page paper, not including references, charts, or a cover page. It must be typewritten and follow APA style 7th edition format (12-point font, double-spaced, standard margins) and include proper references when appropriate. 3) Organize the various parts of your paper with the section headings provided (headings are identified in bold). Be sure you answer all subsections of each heading. Students will critically analyze the readings from Chapters 14, and 15 in your textbook. This assignment is designed to help you evaluate, analyze, and apply the readings to your Health Care Human Resource department as well as develop the groundwork for all your outstanding projects. You need to read the chapters assigned for week 6 and develop a 3-4-page paper reproducing your understanding and capability to apply the readings to your Health Care Human Resource Department. Each paper must be typewritten with a 12-point font and double-spaced with standard margins. Follow APA style 7th edition format when referring to the selected articles and include a reference page. EACH PAPER SHOULD INCLUDE THE FOLLOWING: 1. Introduction (25%) Provide a brief synopsis of the meaning (not a description) of each Chapter you read, in your own words. 2. Your Critique (50%) a. Organizational Setting *Describe the organization. *What are the demographics of the staff & clients? * What services are provided? b. Organizational Climate. *What is the climate of the organization? *The guiding philosophy? *The stated and unstated values? * Which type of organization is your organization? *What are the human resource needs? * How are decisions made in your organization? * How do individuals form relationships, adapt to the environment, and terminate? 3. Conclusion (15%) Briefly summarize your opinions & deduction to your critique of the Chapter you read. How did these Chapters influence your judgments on Training and Development? Evaluation will be based on how you respond to the above, in particular: a) The clarity with which you critique the chapters. b) The depth, scope, and organization of your paper; and, c) Your conclusions, including a description of the impact of these Chapters on any Health Care Setting. Due date: Saturday, December 3, 2022, at 11:59 PM ASSIGNMENT RUBRICS Assignments Guidelines Introduction Your Organization Analysis Conclusion Total 10 Points 25 Points 50 Points 15 Points 100 points ASSIGNMENT GRADING SYSTEM A B+ B C+ C D F Dr. Gregory 90% – 100% 85% – 89% 80% – 84% 75% – 79% 70% – 74% 60% – 69% 50% – 59% Or less. 10% 25% 50% 15% 100%
- Grid View
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||
| Main Posting | 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
 Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?Get your assignment on Performance Appraisal and Human Resource Management Essay completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
 Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?Get your assignment on Performance Appraisal and Human Resource Management Essay done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW! Supported by at least three current, credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.
Supported by at least three credible sources.
Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s).
One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.
Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Post is cited with two credible sources.
Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Contains some APA formatting errors. |
0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.
Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.
Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Contains only one or no credible sources.
Not written clearly or concisely.
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
|
| Main Post: Timeliness | 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3. |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3. |
|
| First Response | 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited. |
|
| Second Response | 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.
Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.
Responses to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited. |
|
| Participation | 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days. |
0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days. |
|
| Total Points: 100 | |||||
Don’t wait until the last minute
Fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work asap.