Reflecting on Your Writing: Reading and Research Strategies- CAEX 8080/8081 Week 2 Discusstion

Reflecting on Your Writing: Reading and Research Strategies- CAEX 8080/8081 Week 2 Discusstion

CAEX 8080/81 Week 2: Getting Started: Critical Reading and Research

Reflecting on Your Writing: Reading and Research Strategies

Beginning an essay can often be the most difficult portion. However, when separated into small steps, this process becomes well defined and much more manageable. During these first steps, any writing that takes place is likely to be minimal and rough. This is acceptable, as you realize you are in the prewriting stage and that you have more writing and revising ahead of you.

Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on Reflecting on Your Writing: Reading and Research Strategies- CAEX 8080/8081 Week 2 Discusstion  completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW

For this Discussion, you will reflect on your own approach to reading and how you have (or, perhaps, have not) used a strategy, such as note-taking, underlining, highlighting, etc., in the past to gather and assess the main ideas from a journal article. Based on what you have learned from the week’s Learning Resources, you will share your thoughts and experiences on reading and researching.

To prepare for this Reflecting on Your Writing: Reading and Research Strategies Discussion:

online nursing essays

Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?

Get your assignment on Reflecting on Your Writing: Reading and Research Strategies- CAEX 8080/8081 Week 2 Discusstion done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!

  • Review the Learning Resources on arguments and critical reading, and the infographic on Analysis.
  • Reflect on your research process in relation to understanding an author’s argument or main idea.
  • You may reflect on past or current examples of your reading and research process.

By Day 3 OF Reflecting on Your Writing: Reading and Research Strategies

Post a 1- to 2-paragraph reflection on your reading and research process, describing strategies that you currently use, as well as any strategies that you could use more effectively. (Note: You may choose to reflect specifically on your approach to this Discussion in relation to reading and research.)

By Day 5 OF Reflecting on Your Writing: Reading and Research Strategies

Respond to at least two of your colleagues’ posts in one or more of the following ways:

  • Share an insight from having read your colleague’s posts.
  • Offer and support an opinion.
  • Validate an idea with your own experience.
  • Make a suggestion.
  • Ask a probing question.
  • Expand on your colleague’s posts.

By Day 7 OF Reflecting on Your Writing: Reading and Research Strategies

Return to this Discussion to read the responses to your initial post.

Click on the Reply button below to reveal the textbox for entering your message. Then click on the Submit button to post your message.

ORDER NOW FOR ORIGINAL PAPER

Reflecting on Your Writing: Reading and Research Strategies: SAMPLE

According to Subramanyam,”The reader should begin by reading the title, abstract and conclusions first. If a decision is made to read the entire article, the key elements of the article can be perused in a systematic manner effectively and efficiently (2013).” A cogent and organized method is presented to read articles published in scientific journals (2013). My reading strategy can be an interesting one because I love to read. Before I start to read a book, I would have a basic idea of what the book is about (highlight and sticky notes). This allows me to ask myself three questions before I start to read. They are: What do I already know? What more do I want to know?, and How can I benefit from the topic? (Index cards)  It is important for me to make sure that I am fully understanding what is being said, so when I come across a particularly difficult part of the text I can stop and think about what I have read. Also, I make sure I keep track of the information and ideas of the text. Reading is a must daily in my household especially the newspaper or a book of choice.

First, in research I always start with title and abstract. That tells me whether or not it is an article I am interested in and whether I will actually be able to understand it both scientifically and linguistically. I then read the introduction so that I can understand the question being framed, and jump right to the figures and tables so I can get an understanding of the data. I then read the discussion to get an idea of how the paper fits into the general knowledge. Research should not be done in a linear way (from beginning to end); instead, it should be done strategically and with a critical mindset, questioning your understanding and the findings (Rodriguez, 2015).

Secondly, in research I generally read the abstract and conclusions. The conclusions help me understand if the goal summarized in the abstract has been reached, and if the described work can be of interest for my own study. I also always look at plot and figures, as they help me get a first impression of a paper. Then, I usually read the entire article from beginning to end, going through the sections in the order they appear so that I can follow the flow of work that the authors want to communicate. This works best for me.

In conclusion, this section is vital. If someone uses an article as a source, it is best to know the general outcome of the author’s research. It is a good idea to read the different section after it is read especially the abstract, then again after reading the rest of the article. The questions can be asked:  Was it proven wrong?, Right?, or Inconclusive? This is a great way to look at it.

Reflecting on Your Writing: Reading and Research Strategies References

Rodriguez, N. (2015). Infographic: How to read a research paper. Elsevier Connect. Retrieved from https://www.elsevier.com/connect/infographic-how-to-read-a-research-paper

Subramanyam, R.V. (2013). Art of reading a journal article: Methodically and effectively. NCBINational Center for Biotechnology Information Search database (1):65-70. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3687192/

CAEX 8080/ 8081 WEEK 2

Assignment: Critical Reading and Researching Main Ideas

In this Week’s Discussion, you reviewed reading strategies and examined your own research process. Now you will put these concepts and insights in practice for this Week’s Assignment.

To prepare for this Assignment:

  • Review the Learning Resource on Determining the Main Points of a Reading.
  • Choose one of the preselected journal articles in this week’s Learning Resources.
  • Applying the concepts from this week’s resources, critically read the journal article, taking notes or engaging in any research methods that you would like to try.

The Assignment:

Select three related main points from the journal article (excluding the Abstract), and directly quote them.

In addition to the directly quoted main points, compose 1–2 sentences of rationale for each main point. Use these sentences to explain the reason you selected each point from the journal article. Consider the following questions in your rationale:

  • Why are these three specific points the author’s main ideas?
  • What makes them stand out to you as a critical reader?
  • How are these main points related to one another?

By Day 7

Submit your Application using the Walden Course Paper template by Day 7. Your submission should be 2-3 paragraphs long.

Note: Assignments that are submitted without using the Walden Course Paper template will not be reviewed by your Instructor.

Submission and Grading Information

To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:

  • Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK2Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
  • Click the Week 2 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
  • Click the Week 2 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
  • Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK2Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
  • If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
  • Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.

Rubric Detail- Reflecting on Your Writing: Reading and Research Strategies

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Exemplary Acceptable Approaching Acceptable Needs Significant Improvement
Clarity and completeness of ideas
(25%) – 5 (25%)
Clear patterns of idea formation. Compelling reasons, detail, and/or examples are provided. Reflecting on Your Writing: Reading and Research Strategies
(20%) – 4 (20%)
Idea formation lacks sufficient evidence and support. Reasons, detail, and/or examples are included but are not clearly linked to the idea.Reflecting on Your Writing: Reading and Research Strategies
(15%) – 3 (15%)
Evidence or support for ideas is poorly developed. Vague or unsupported reasons, details, and/or examples are given.Reflecting on Your Writing: Reading and Research Strategies
(0%) – 2 (10%)
No attempt has been made to tie ideas to evidence or logic. No reasons, detail, or examples are given.Reflecting on Your Writing: Reading and Research Strategies
Grammar/mechanics
(25%) – 5 (25%)
Grammar, punctuation, and presentation are exemplary.
(20%) – 4 (20%)
Grammar, punctuation, and presentation are mostly consistent with the conventions of academic English.
(15%) – 3 (15%)
Grammar, punctuation, and presentation are not consistent with conventions of academic English.Reflecting on Your Writing: Reading and Research Strategies
(0%) – 2 (10%)
Grammar, punctuation, and presentation are unacceptable for scholarly writing.Reflecting on Your Writing: Reading and Research Strategies
Addressing task
(25%) – 5 (25%)
Addresses all aspects of the task fully and completely.
(20%) – 4 (20%)
Addresses the task with occasional divergences and/or omissions.
(15%) – 3 (15%)
Attempts to address the task but leaves important areas of question unanswered.
(0%) – 2 (10%)
Response does not address the task.
Responses to other students
(25%) – 5 (25%)
Responds in a thoughtful or probing way to extend the conversation.Reflecting on Your Writing: Reading and Research Strategies
(20%) – 4 (20%)
Minimal response to two classmates.Reflecting on Your Writing: Reading and Research Strategies
(15%) – 3 (15%)
Responds to only one classmate completely or to two classmates incompletely.
(0%) – 2 (10%)
Does not respond or responds superficially.Reflecting on Your Writing: Reading and Research Strategies
Total Points: 20

Don’t wait until the last minute

Fill in your requirements and let our experts deliver your work asap.

Similar Posts