NURS 6003 Week 6 Assignment Transition to Graduate Study
NURS 6003 Week 6 Assignment Transition to Graduate Study
NURS 6003 Week 6 Assignment Transition to Graduate Study
Week 6 Discussion
Using the Walden Library
The peer-reviewed article I will cite is “Effects of a Geriatric Nurse Practitioner on Process and Outcome of Nursing Home Care” (1989). To find this article, I searched the Am J Public Health Journal library. When determining the best type of article to use for this post, I referenced the web article “What Types of References are Appropriate?” (S.C. Pan. 2021). This article includes information on peer-review journals, and determines that these are the best to use. An article in the National Library of Medicine (NLM. 2021) assisted me in understanding what a peer-reviewed article all entails. The article I found discusses using doctors versus nurse practitioners to care for the elderly in nursing homes. The main difficulty I found was to find an article that was both relevant to the topic as well as current. This article is a little dated, however, I did feel that the findings in this peer-reviewed article are still relevant today. The article discusses an improvement in activities of daily living, nursing and drug therapies. Also, that the number of admissions to hospitals as well as the days in the nursing home were decreased with the use of a Nurse Practitioner in the nursing home setting. This journal would be helpful to classmates of mine. It did appear to have well-written and well-researched nursing topics. This database will also be helpful to me going forward as I will need to reference more peer-cited information for class.
References
Kane, R & Garrard, J & Skay, C & Radosevich, D. (1989). Effects of a Geriatric Nurse Practitioner on Process and Outcome of Nursing Home Care. ALPH. September 1989. Volume 79. No. 9.
National Library of Medicine staff. (2021). Peer-reviewed literature. National Library of Medicine website. https://www.nlm.nih.gov/nichsr/stats_tutorial/section3/mod6_peer.html
S.C. Pan. (2021). What Types of References are Appropriate. UCSD psychology website. https://psychology.ucsd.edu/undergraduate-program/undergraduate-resources/academic-writing-resources/writing-research-papers/appropriate-references.html
Where can you find evidence to inform your thoughts and scholarly writing? Throughout your degree program, you will use research literature to explore ideas, guide your thinking, and gain new insights. As you search the research literature, it is important to use resources that are peer-reviewed and from scholarly journals. You may already have some favorite online resources and databases that you use or have found useful in the past. For this Discussion, you explore databases available through the Walden Library.
To Prepare:
Review the information presented in the Learning Resources for using the Walden Library, searching the databases, and evaluating online resources.
Begin searching for a peer-reviewed article that pertains to your practice area and interests you.
By Day 3 of Week 6
Post the following:
Using proper APA formatting, cite the peer-reviewed article you selected that pertains to your practice area and is of particular interest to you and identify the database that you used to search for the article. Explain any difficulties you experienced while searching for this article. Would this database be useful to your colleagues? Explain why or why not. Would you recommend this database? Explain why or why not
By Day 6 of Week 6
Respond to at least two of your colleagues’ posts by offering suggestions/strategies for working with this database from your own experience, or offering ideas for using alternative resources.
Click on the Reply button below to reveal the textbox for entering your message. Then click on the Submit button to post your message.
ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT:NURS6003 Week 6 Discussion Transition to Graduate Study
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.
Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.
Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NURS 6003 Week 6 Assignment Transition to Graduate Study completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW
Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.
The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NURS 6003 Week 6 Assignment Transition to Graduate Study done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
Part 1: Writing Sample: The Connection between Academic and Professional Integrity
Academic integrity and scholarly writing go hand in hand. While communicating using the written word is an inherently creative process, academic integrity is the practice of holding oneself accountable for one’s work. The reason academic integrity is important is that honesty is really the best policy, and using your own perspective and words makes your writing unique. Therefore, academic integrity and writing are a pair that work together and create professional content that is your own. In academic writing, one must be sure that papers are properly formatted using the APA format, and that all resources are properly cited. The “Writing Center staff created this APA checklist to help students remember the basics of APA citations, reference lists, and style” (“Academic Guides: Plagiarism Prevention Resource Kit: Home”, 2022). Using the provided resources will help students improve their scholarly writing.
Professional practices and scholarly ethics are both important, as they serve to guide and manage students to do their best. This writer believes it is also important for us to use these resources to substantiate our arguments in our writing and to make sure we are using reliable scholarly information. We must have the education piece to be able to properly conduct our writing for our audience. The two components are what students build on and grow when they go on to the real world in their profession. The academic and professional pieces of resources will guide me in succeeding in this program, so I do plan on utilizing these resources.
Grammarly, Safe Assign, and paraphrasing all contribute to academic integrity in different ways. Grammarly is a powerful tool that can be used to correct one’s grammar, thus improving writing skills. The “Walden University’s Writing Center provides premium Grammarly accounts to all current Walden University students at no additional cost” (“Academic Guides: Grammarly: Overview”, 2022). Students can build confidence in their writing by using this program to improve their scholarly writing.
SafeAssign exists to avoid plagiarism and to make sure that writing is original and uses the student’s own words. “The Walden University student handbook broadly defines plagiarism as the “use of intellectual material produced by another person without acknowledging its source” (“Academic Guides: Plagiarism Prevention Resource Kit: Home”, 2022). SafeAssign provides students with clarity by checking their writing and affirming that their work is original. “SafeAssign is Walden’s primary tool for detecting, deterring, and preventing plagiarism” (“Academic Guides: Grammarly: Overview”, 2022). “The student resources below will support you in using SafeAssign, including how to submit drafts and assignments through SafeAssign and how to interpret a SafeAssign Originality Report” (“Academic Guides: Grammarly: Overview”, 2022). Paraphrasing is another element of academic integrity because it is important that students use their own knowledge, and not just another person’s words and ideas.
PART 2: Strategies for Maintaining Integrity of Work
Scholarly writing requires effort and due diligence. The writer plans to execute this by utilizing the tools and resources that are presented to me, such as the writing center, the library, and more. This will help to expand my knowledge and thus improve my writing skills. Other strategies the writer intends to practice in order to maintain academic integrity as a student include using resources, such as Grammarly and SafeAssign. The writer will use up-to-date resources to ensure that my written work is credible. I will use these strategies to guide me in my practice and my journey to becoming a scholarly writer.
The MSN program encourages students to practice using their own words in order to maintain academic integrity. “Integrity involves treating others with respect communicating with one another in a positive, courteous manner, honoring confidences, and maintaining a professional demeanor both in and out of the workplace” (Rosenkoetter & Milstead, 2010). While the writer continues to grow in the nursing profession, the writer vows to maintain integrity and ethics by using strategies taught to me by the Walden University’s program.
The Walden university website will provide me with all the essential tools I will need to be successful in this program. The Walden library is where I can find the references that will provide me with the information to write my papers. It is available to me on a daily basis, whenever the writer may happen to need it. The writer can find books, websites, journals, and much more through this resource. The writer anticipates that this is where the writer will find many of my evidence-based resources when writing my papers.
As a nursing healthcare professional, the writer will stay up to date with the latest evidence-based practices so that the writer can share relevant information with my patients and communicate it in a way that is professionally based on the policies and procedures pertaining to my work. Another strategy the writer intends to utilize to maintain integrity throughout my professional work includes networking by attending conferences and workshops. The writer will “recognize the value of codes of ethics developed by the American Nurses Association and the International Council of Nurses; the use of these codes by practicing nurses to guide clinical practice is a long-held standard in the nursing profession” (Rosenkoetter & Milstead, 2010).
References
Academic Guides: Plagiarism Prevention Resource Kit: Home. Academicguides.waldenu.edu. (2022). Retrieved 4 October 2022, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/plagiarism#s-lg-box-22570871.
(2022). Retrieved 4 October 2022, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/apa/checklist.
Academic Guides: Grammarly: Overview. Academicguides.waldenu.edu. (2022). Retrieved 4 October 2022, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/grammarly.
Academic Guides: Academic Integrity: SafeAssign & Turnitin. Academicguides.waldenu.edu. (2022). Retrieved 4 October 2022, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/studentaffairs/academicintegrity/safe-assign-turn-it-in.
American Nurses Association (2001). Code of ethics for nurses with interpretive statements. Silver Spring, MD: Author. International Council of Nurses. (2006). The ICN code of ethics for nurses [brochure]. Geneva: Author. Rosenkoetter, M. (1983). A code of ethics for nursing educators. Nursing Outlook, 31, 288. Rosenkoetter, M., & Milstead, J. (2010). A code of ethics for nurse educators: Revised. Nursing Ethics, 17, 137-139.
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Name: NURS_6003_Module01_Week01_Discussion_Rubric
Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Main Posting |
45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
Supported by at least three current, credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth. Supported by at least three credible sources. Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to some of the discussion question(s).
One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed. Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Post is cited with two credible sources. Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Contains some APA formatting errors. |
0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.
Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria. Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis. Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module. Contains only one or no credible sources. Not written clearly or concisely. Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors. Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style. |
Main Post: Timeliness |
10 (10%) – 10 (10%)
Posts main post by day 3.
|
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
|
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
|
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
Does not post by day 3.
|
First Response |
17 (17%) – 18 (18%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
15 (15%) – 16 (16%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
13 (13%) – 14 (14%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 12 (12%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. |
Second Response |
16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.
Responds fully to questions posed by faculty. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources. Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues. Responses to faculty questions are answered, if posed. Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources. Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. |
12 (12%) – 13 (13%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed. Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. |
0 (0%) – 11 (11%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication. Responses to faculty questions are missing. No credible sources are cited. |
Participation |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.
|
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
|
0 (0%) – 0 (0%)
|