Ethical Case Study Assignment

Ethical Case Study Assignment

Ethical Case Study Assignment

Ethical Case Study Assignment

ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT : Ethical Case Study Assignment

Question Description
Describe how patient information entered into an electronic health record is used in patient evaluation and clinical decision making.
Define meaningful use metrics.
Consider how work-flow can contribute to patient outcomes and affect patient safety.
Discuss the role of the inter-professional team, communication and the use of theElectronic Health Record (EHR) affect on patient outcomes. Write a 2-3-page paper in APA format responding to each of the questions following the case study.
Note:- The paper will be submitted through the Canvas. TurnItIn and Grammarly should report no more than 15% originality.

Criteria
Ratings
Pts
TopicNU225-CO2; NU225-CO3
15.0 ptsLevel 5

Identifies a creative, focused, and manageable topic clearly addressing important points.
13.5 ptsLevel 4

Identifies a manageable topic that addresses important points.
12.0 ptsLevel 3

Identifies a focused topic that addresses important points.
10.5 ptsLevel 2

Identifies a topic that while doable, is too narrowly focused.
9.0 ptsLevel 1

Identifies a topic that is far too general and wide-ranging as to be doable.
0.0 ptsLevel 0

Does not clearly identify a topic or identifies a topic that is not relevant to the assignment.
15.0pts

Existing Knowledge, Research, and/or ViewsPRICE-P
25.0 ptsLevel 5

Uses in-depth information from relevant sources representing multiple points of views (3 or more) or research aspects (3 or more).
21.67 ptsLevel 4

Describes in-depth information from relevant sources representing at least two points of view or research aspects.
18.33 ptsLevel 3

Explains information from relevant sources representing at least two points of view or research aspects.
15.0 ptsLevel 2

Relates information from relevant and irrelevant sources. No clear point of view(s) of approach(es) are identified.
11.67 ptsLevel 1

Tells information from irrelevant sources representing a single point of view or does not identify points of view or approaches.
0.0 ptsLevel 0

Information is irrelevant to the topic. No clear point of view/approaches.
25.0pts

ContentNU225-CO2; NU225-CO3
25.0 ptsLevel 5

Demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of all relevant contextual factors.
22.0 ptsLevel 4

Demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, and problem statement is adequately detailed.
20.0 ptsLevel 3

Begins to demonstrate the ability to construct a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement with evidence of most relevant contextual factors, but problem statement is superficial.
18.0 ptsLevel 2

Demonstrates a limited ability in identifying a problem statement/thesis statement/topic statement or related contextual factors.
16.0 ptsLevel 1

Demonstrates the ability to explain contextual factors but does not provide a defined statement.
0.0 ptsLevel 0

There is no evidence of a defined statement.
25.0pts

AnalysisNU225-CO2; NU225-CO3
25.0 ptsLevel 5

Organizes and compares evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
22.0 ptsLevel 4

Organizes and interprets evidence to reveal patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
20.0 ptsLevel 3

Organizes and describes evidence according to patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.
18.0 ptsLevel 2

Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing patterns, differences, or similarities.
16.0 ptsLevel 1

Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.
0.0 ptsLevel 0

Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/or is unrelated to focus.
25.0pts

Conclusion
15.0 ptsLevel 5

Assembles a conclusion that is a logical interpretation from findings.
13.0 ptsLevel 4

Constructs a conclusion that is logical from inquiry findings.
11.0 ptsLevel 3

Identifies a conclusion specifically from and responds specifically to the findings.
9.0 ptsLevel 2

Produces a general conclusion that, because it is so general, also applies beyond the scope of the inquiry findings.
7.0 ptsLevel 1

States an ambiguous or unsupportable conclusion from findings.
0.0 ptsLevel 0

States an illogical conclusion from findings.
15.0pts

Limitations and Implications
15.0 ptsLevel 5

Insightfully discusses in detail relevant and supported limitations and implications.
13.0 ptsLevel 4

Examines relevant and supported limitations and implications.
11.0 ptsLevel 3

Discusses relevant and supported limitations and implications.
9.0 ptsLevel 2

Presents relevant and supported limitations and implications.
7.0 ptsLevel 1

Presents limitations and implications, but they are unsupported.
0.0 ptsLevel 0

Presents limitations and implications, but they are irrelevant.
15.0pts

Writing
15.0 ptsLevel 5

The paper exhibits an excellent command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.
13.5 ptsLevel 4

The paper exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.
12.0 ptsLevel 3

The paper exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.
10.5 ptsLevel 2

The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.
9.0 ptsLevel 1

The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.
0.0 ptsLevel 0

The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.
15.0pts

APA

PRICE-I
15.0 ptsLevel 5

The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.
13.5 ptsLevel 4

The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
12.0 ptsLevel 3

The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
10.5 ptsLevel 2

Ethical Case Study Assignment

The required APA elements are not all included and/or there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.
9.0 ptsLevel 1

Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.
0.0 ptsLevel 0

There is little to no evidence of APA formatting and/or there are no in-text citations and/or references.
15.0pts

Total Points: 150.0

You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.

Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.

Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.

The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

Discussion Questions (DQ)

• Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.
• Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.
• One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.
• I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.

Weekly Participation

• Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.
• In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.
• Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).
• Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.

APA Format and Writing Quality

• Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).
• Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.
• I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6^th edition.

Use of Direct Quotes

• I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.
• As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.
• It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.

 

LopesWrite Policy

• For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
• Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
• Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
• Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.

Late Policy

• The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
• Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
• If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
• I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
• As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.

Communication

• Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
  • Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
  • Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.