DeVRY NR 361-Week 6 Assignment: Interview with a Nurse Information Expert

DeVRY NR 361-Week 6 Assignment: Interview with a Nurse Information Expert

DeVRY NR 361-Week 6 Assignment: Interview with a Nurse Information Expert

Interview with a Nursing Information Expert

As a nurse, you have many responsibilities. Nurses are multitaskers they monitor the patients, medications, equipment, and much more while documenting everything that has been done.   “Most technologies are designed by people unfamiliar with nurses’ workflow, and they fail to appreciate the multitude of other devices the nurse is simultaneously managing” (Ruppel & Funk, 2018). Therefore, due to these designers not understanding what a nurse’s role is the technology that we use does not always fit well with the nursing roles. Multitasking is overwhelming and nursing is a hard job in general adding the two can cause errors. Bed alarms are designed to alarm when the patient is moving off the bed. The alarm can also go off when the patient makes certain movements not just moving off the bed.  For example, a nurse working a unit with several patients. One of the patients has a bed alarm and tends to make it go off on purpose multiples times. When the nurse arrives, the patient asks her about her day but does not need assistance. At the end of the night the nurse is busy when that patients bed alarm goes off, but the nurse ignores it because of what she experienced all day. “This alarm fatigue is compounded by the number of potential false alarms during a nurses’ work shift” (Hebda, Hunter, & Czar, 2019). The patient had called the nurse to ask for assistance to the bathroom. When the nurse did not respond the patient went alone and fell on the way and broke his leg. This is an ethical because there was a poor patient outcome due to unknown distraction and continuous false alarms. One of the nursing ethical guiding principles is “nonmaleficence: the obligation for doing no intentional harm” (Hebda, Hunter, & Czar, 2019).  The nurse did not do intentional harm but cause harm due to the intentional disregard of the bed alarm.

“Alarms are by intent interruptive. Interruptions are typically considered to have a negative effect on patient safety. However, interruptions have been associated with an increased risk of errors” (Ruppel & Funk, 2018). The evidence shows that alarms are used to help patients, but they are a risk for negative patient safety. There is still need for research on how to join the two worlds where they can work together. One way is the lessen the nurses workload so that she does not feel overwhelmed to the point where they ignore their patients.

References

Hebda, T., Hunter, K., & Czar, P. (2019). Handbook of informatics for nurses & healthcare professionals (6th ed.). Pearson.

Ruppel, H., & Funk, M. (2018). Nurse–Technology Interactions and Patient Safety. Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America, 30(2), 203-213. doi:10.1016/j.cnc.2018.02.003

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to:

communicate your understanding of the importance of quality
information in everyday nursing practice; discuss the roles and responsibilities of a Nursing
Information Expert; and articulate how the professional nurse uses information/data
in every day practice to improve outcomes.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following
Course Outcomes.

CO#1: Describe patient-care technologies as appropriate to
address the needs of a diverse patient population. (PO#1)

CO#4: Investigate safeguards and decision-making support
tools embedded in patient care technologies and information systems to support
a safe practice environment for both patients and healthcare workers.

CO#8: Discuss the value of best evidence as a driving force
to institute change in delivery of nursing care. (PO#8)

Points

This assignment is worth a total of 225 points.

Due Date

This assignment, Interview with a Nursing Information
Expert, is due at the end of Week 6. Submit your completed Interview, using the
Interview Form, by Sunday, 11:59 p.m. MT. Post questions to the Q & A
Forum. Contact your instructor if you need additional assistance. See the
Policies regarding late assignments. Failure to submit your paper on time will
result in a deduction of points.

Directions

Download the NR361 Interview Form (Links to an external
site.)Links to an external site., which will be used to complete this
assignment.

Select your interviewee and schedule an interview. This
individual must be a Registered Nurse. Job titles of RNs who may be considered
include, but are not limited to, Nursing Clinical Information Manager; Super
User, Director/Manger Clinical Education; Chief Information Officer; Quality
Assurance or Performance Improvement Nurse; Nurse Informaticist; Telenursing
Specialist; Nurse Abstractor; Case Manager; Compliance Nurse. If you have any
concerns about whether the RN is suitable for this assignment, contact your
instructor BEFORE you schedule the interview.

Review all questions (areas of inquiry) on the Interview
Form PRIOR to conducting the interview. You may print the form and take it with
you to the interview.

Note there are five required questions to ask the RN.

Note there are four optional questions. You need to select
only one of these to ask the RN.

Check Out also:  NR 447 Week 3 Discussion Week 3: Conflict and Collaboration 

Note there are two follow-up questions that must be answered
by you.

Prior to conducting your interview, review two scholarly
resources. These resources should guide your understanding of the RN’s role and

responsibilities or make you more knowledgeable about GIGO, Interprofessional
Communication, or other key concepts in the questions that you may not fully
understand. For example, if your interviewee is a telenurse, you would want to
review information on this specialty. If you do not know what GIGO means, look
it up.

Conduct your interview. The length of your interview will
vary but should not exceed one hour.

Submit the completed interview form prior to the deadline
outlined above.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: DeVRY NR 361-Week 6 Assignment: Interview with a Nurse Information Expert

Name:  Assignment Rubric

• Grid View
• List View

		Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
Summarize your interpretation of the frequency data provided in the output for respondent’s age, highest school grade completed, and family income from prior month.		32 (32%) – 35 (35%) The response accurately and clearly explains, in detail, a summary of the frequency distributions for the variables presented. The response accurately and clearly explains, in detail, the number of times the value occurs in the data. The response accurately and clearly explains, in detail, the appearance of the data, the range of data values, and an explanation of extreme values in describing intervals that sufficiently provides an analysis that fully supports the categorization of each variable value. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanations provided for each of the areas described.	28 (28%) – 31 (31%) The response accurately summarizes the frequency distributions for the variables presented. The response accurately explains the number of times the value occurs in the data. The response accurately explains the appearance of the data, the range of data values, and explains extreme values in describing intervals that provides an analysis which supports the categorization of each variable value. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the explanations provided for each of the areas described.	25 (25%) – 27 (27%) The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes the frequency distributions for the variables presented. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the number of times the value occurs in the data. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the appearance of the data, the range of data values, and inaccurately or vaguely explains extreme values. An analysis that may support the categorization of each variable value is inaccurate or vague. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the explanations provided for each of the areas described.	0 (0%) – 24 (24%) The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes the frequency distributions for the variables presented, or it is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the number of times the value occurs in the data, or it is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the appearance of the data, the range of data values, and an explanation of extreme values, or it is missing. An analysis that does not support the categorization of each variable values is provided, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanations provided for each of the areas described, or it is missing.
Summarize your interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided in the output for respondent’s age, highest school grade completed, race and ethnicity, currently employed, and family income from prior month.		45 (45%) – 50 (50%) The response accurately and clearly summarizes in detail the interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided. The response accurately and clearly evaluates in detail each of the variables presented, including an accurate and complete description of the sample size, the mean, the median, standard deviation, and the size and spread of the data.	40 (40%) – 44 (44%) The response accurately summarizes the interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided. The response accurately explains evaluates each of the variables presented, including an accurate description of the sample size, the mean, the median, standard deviation, and the size and spread of the data.	35 (35%) – 39 (39%) The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes the interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided. The response inaccurately or vaguely evaluates each of the variables presented, including an inaccurate or vague description of the sample size, the mean, the median, the standard deviation, and the size and spread of the data.	0 (0%) – 34 (34%) The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes the interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided, or it is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely evaluates each of the variables presented, including an inaccurate and vague description of the sample size, the mean, the median, the standard deviation, and the size and spread of the data, or it is missing.
Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.		5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.	4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.	3 (3%) – 3 (3%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.	0 (0%) – 2 (2%) Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.
Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation		5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.	4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.	3 (3%) – 3 (3%) Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.	0 (0%) – 2 (2%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.		5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct APA format with no errors.	4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.	3 (3%) – 3 (3%) Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.	0 (0%) – 2 (2%) Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
Total Points: 100

Name:  Assignment Rubric