NR 393 Week 6 Course Project Milestone 3: Guidelines
NR 393 Week 6 Course Project Milestone 3: Guidelines
NR 393 Week 6 Course Project Milestone 3: Guidelines
https://nursingmill.blog/nr-393-week-6-course-project-milestone-3-guidelines/
Purpose
To apply lessons in nursing history to living nurses contributing to nursing history through an interview and recording of historical information.
Course Outcomes
The Course Project enables the student to meet the following Course Outcomes.
CO 1. Incorporate appropriate historical perspectives into current professional nursing practice (PO 2).
CO 4. Compare current professional nursing practice roles with historical roles of the nurse (PO 7).
Points
The entire project is worth 600 points. Milestone 3 is worth 300 points of this total.
Due Date
Submit your completed NR393 Milestone 3 by the end of Week 6 by 11:59 p.m. MT.
Requirements and Guidelines
If submission method is written (typed on the template), do the following.
Carefully review this Milestone 3 Guidelines document and the Milestone 3 Template (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
The interview must take place in a face-to-face or phone conversation only. An e-mail interview or asking the nurse to complete a written or typed interview is not permitted.
Download the Milestone 3 Template (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site. save it to your computer in Microsoft Word 2010 (or later) as a .docx file with the file name: Your Last Name NR393 Milestone 3.docx.
Carefully review the assigned areas for Milestone 3, and type directly on your saved Milestone 3 Template.
Use your instructor’s feedback from Milestone 2 to revise your questions prior to the interview.
Submit your completed Milestone 3 Template by Sunday at the end of Week 6.
If submission method is audio or audio/video, do the following.
Carefully review the Milestone 3 Guidelines document. The recording should be approximately 8 to 12 minutes.
The interview must take place in a face-to-face or phone conversation only. An e-mail interview or asking the nurse to complete a written or typed interview is not permitted.
Edit the recording as needed prior to submission.
The audio or AV file must be able to be submitted on the Week 6 Assignments page and downloaded by the instructor for scoring. If it cannot be attached or downloaded, you will need to submit your Milestone 3 by typing on the Milestone 3 Template (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site..
Criteria for Content
- Scholarliness: In this category, the student will conduct a search of the current databases and locate valid, relevant, and reliable information for the required topic. Each reference must be scholarly.
- Application of Course Knowledge: In this category, the student demonstrates the ability to analyze and apply principles, knowledge, and information learned in the course lesson and outside readings. This information is then applied to a real-life professional situation as an example.
- Interactive Dialogue: In this category, the minimum requirements are to provide an initial posting to the graded threaded discussion topic by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT of each week. In addition, one peer response and one instructor response are required. These postings must be completed by Sunday, 11:59 pm MT of each week. The initial posting, peer response, and instructor response must be on 3 separate days.
- Grammar, Syntax, APA: Proper grammar, APA, and syntax is required for all posts. Students should follow the APA Manual 6th Edition. Additional APA information is available in Course Resources.
- Participation Requirement: One initial posting, one peer response and one instructor response (for a total of 3 posts for the week) are required on 3 separate days.
- Participation Deadline: The student must provide a substantive response to the graded threaded discussion topic. This must be posted by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT of each week. Peer and instructor responses must be posted by Sunday, 11:59 pm MT.
- For week 8 only: the required postings are amended due to the shorter week. Two posts are required. One initial post and either a peer response or an instructor response. Initial post must be a minimum of 200 words and the peer or instructor response must be a minimum of 100 words. Both posts are required to be on two separate days. All posts must be made by Wednesday, 11:59 pm MT.
Criteria for Format and Special Instructions
- Instructor reserves the right to submit any threaded discussion posting to TurnItIn in order to verify the originality.
- When journals are used as the outside source of information, it is preferred that the journal be peer reviewed. The Chamberlain online librarian is very helpful in assisting you to find an article related to your topic. If you have questions concerning scholarly sources, please refer to the handout entitled “What is a scholarly source” located under “Course Resources” tab.
- Web sites vary in quality and scholarship. It is the responsibility of the student to determine the scholarly nature of the web site. If the instructor determines that the site failed to demonstrate scholarship, points maybe deducted. Students are cautioned to use care regarding .com sites. Some .com sites are excellent such as American Heart Association, but others are built by individuals and scholarliness is lacking. It is recommended that you check with your instructor before using a .com website as a reference.
- Only one small quote (15 words or less) within the entire initial posting is acceptable. It is expected that the student will paraphrase the information when presenting information from a scholarly source. The scholarly source(s) for the paraphrased information must be cited using APA format. Do not include a number of small quotes even if they are just a few words as your instructor considers a quote to be a quote no matter its limited size.
Instructors are not able to provide advice or technical support regarding recordings. Submission of a recording is not required.
Use your instructor’s feedback from Milestone 2 to revise your questions prior to the interview.
Submit your completed Milestone 3 by Sunday at end of Week 6.
Note: Only one Milestone 3 file is accepted. If you choose to use audio or AV, all parts of Milestone 3 must be on that recording. Do not submit additional files.
Academic Integrity Reminder
Chamberlain College of Nursing values honesty and integrity. All students should be aware of the Academic Integrity policy and follow it in all discussions and assignments.
Course Project Milestone 3Template
Prior to completing this template, carefully review Course Project Milestone 3 Guidelines paying particular attention to how to name the document and all rubric requirements. After saving the document to your computer, type your answers directly on this template, and save again. This assignment is due by Sunday end of Week 6 by 11:59 p.m.MT.
StudentName:_____________________
| Assignment Criteria | Type the statements into the boxes below. Use exact words spoken by each person.Note: See Milestone 3Rubric for details required in each area. |
| Introduction: | |
| Student Introduction and Statement of Purpose30 points | |
| Nurse Introduction30 points | |
| Nurse States Verbal Permission for Interview and Submission30 points | |
| Questions and Answers | |
| Primary Question 1 | |
| Follow-up a | |
| Follow-up b | |
| Primary Question 2 | |
| Follow-up a | |
| Follow-up b | |
| Primary Question 3 | |
| Follow-up a | |
| Follow-up b | |
| Primary Question 4 | |
| Follow-up a | |
| Follow-up b | |
| Primary Question 5 | |
| Follow-up a | |
| Follow-up b | |
and assignments.
Course Project Milestone 3Template
Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NR 393 Week 6 Course Project Milestone 3: Guidelines completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW
Prior to completing this template, carefully review Course Project Milestone 3 Guidelines paying particular attention to how to name the document and all rubric requirements. After saving the document to your computer, type your answers directly on this template, and save again. This assignment is due by Sunday end of Week 6 by 11:59 p.m.MT.
StudentName:_____________________
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NR 393 Week 6 Course Project Milestone 3: Guidelines done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
| Assignment Criteria | Type the statements into the boxes below. Use exact words spoken by each person.Note: See Milestone 3Rubric for details required in each area. |
| Introduction: | |
| Student Introduction and Statement of Purpose30 points | |
| Nurse Introduction30 points | |
| Nurse States Verbal Permission for Interview and Submission30 points | |
| Questions and Answers | |
| Primary Question 1 | |
| Follow-up a | |
| Follow-up b | |
| Primary Question 2 | |
| Follow-up a | |
| Follow-up b | |
| Primary Question 3 | |
| Follow-up a | |
| Follow-up b | |
| Primary Question 4 | |
| Follow-up a | |
| Follow-up b | |
| Primary Question 5 | |
| Follow-up a | |
| Follow-up b |
Late Assignment Policy
Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment.
In the event of an emergency that prevents timely submission of an assignment, students may petition their instructor for a waiver of the late submission grade reduction. The instructor will review the student’s rationale for the request and make a determination based on the merits of the student’s appeal. Consideration of the student’s total course performance to date will be a contributing factor in the determination. Students should continue to attend class, actively participate, and complete other assignments while the appeal is pending.
This Policy applies to assignments that contribute to the numerical calculation of the course letter grade.
Evaluation Methods
The maximum score in this class is 1,000 points. The categories, which contribute to your final grade, are weighted as follows.
| Graded Item | Points | Weighting |
|---|---|---|
| Discussion (50 points, Weeks 1–7; 25 points, Week 8) | 375 | 37.5% |
| Shared Governance Model Paper (Week 3) | 200 | 20% |
| Management of Power Paper (Week 5) | 200 | 20% |
| Executive Summary (Week 7) | 225 | 22.5% |
| Total | 1,000 | 100% |
No extra credit assignments are permitted for any reason.
All of your course requirements are graded using points. At the end of the course, the points are converted to a letter grade using the scale in the table below. Percentages of 0.5% or higher are not raised to the next whole number. A final grade of 76% (letter grade C) is required to pass the course.
| Letter Grade | Points | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| A | 940–1,000 | 94% to 100% |
| A- | 920–939 | 92% to 93% |
| B+ | 890–919 | 89% to 91% |
| B | 860–889 | 86% to 88% |
| B- | 840–859 | 84% to 85% |
| C+ | 810–839 | 81% to 83% |
| C | 760–809 | 76% to 80% |
| F | 759 and below | 75% and below |
NOTE:To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday of the eighth week.
Students agree that, by taking this course, all required papers may be subject to submission for textual similarity review to Turnitin.com for the detection of plagiarism. All submitted papers will be included as source documents in the Turnitin.com reference database solely for the purpose of detecting plagiarism of such papers. Use of the Turnitin.com service is subject to the Terms and Conditions of Use posted on the Turnitin.com site.
Participation for MSN
Threaded Discussion Guiding Principles
The ideas and beliefs underpinning the threaded discussions (TDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The use of TDs provides students with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid environment that models professional and social interaction. The TD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship. Participation in the TDs generates opportunities for students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. TDs foster the development of members into a community of learners as they share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other disciplines.
Participation Guidelines
Each weekly threaded discussion is worth up to 25 points. Students must post a minimum of two times in each graded thread. The two posts in each individual thread must be on separate days. The student must provide an answer to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week. If the student does not provide an answer to each graded thread topic (not a response to a student peer) before the Wednesday deadline, 5 points are deducted for each discussion thread in which late entry occurs (up to a 10-point deduction for that week). Subsequent posts, including essential responses to peers, must occur by the Sunday deadline, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.
Direct Quotes
Good writing calls for the limited use of direct quotes. Direct quotes in Threaded Discussions are to be limited to one short quotation (not to exceed 15 words). The quote must add substantively to the discussion. Points will be deducted under the Grammar, Syntax, APA category.
APA Writing Checklist
Use this document as a checklist for each paper you will write throughout your GCU graduate program. Follow specific instructions indicated in the assignment and use this checklist to help ensure correct grammar and APA formatting. Refer to the APA resources available in the GCU Library and Student Success Center.
Check Out Also: Provide a list and brief description of at least
☐ APA paper template (located in the Student Success Center/Writing Center) is utilized for the correct format of the paper. APA style is applied, and format is correct throughout.
☐ The title page is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ The introduction is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ Topic is well defined.
☐ Strong thesis statement is included in the introduction of the paper.
☐ The thesis statement is consistently threaded throughout the paper and included in the conclusion.
☐ Paragraph development: Each paragraph has an introductory statement, two or three sentences as the body of the paragraph, and a transition sentence to facilitate the flow of information. The sections of the main body are organized to reflect the main points of the author. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ All sources are cited. APA style and format are correctly applied and are free from error.
☐ Sources are completely and correctly documented on a References page, as appropriate to assignment and APA style, and format is free of error.
Scholarly Resources: Scholarly resources are written with a focus on a specific subject discipline and usually written by an expert in the same subject field. Scholarly resources are written for an academic audience.
Examples of Scholarly Resources include: Academic journals, books written by experts in a field, and formally published encyclopedias and dictionaries.
Peer-Reviewed Journals: Peer-reviewed journals are evaluated prior to publication by experts in the journal’s subject discipline. This process ensures that the articles published within the journal are academically rigorous and meet the required expectations of an article in that subject discipline.
Empirical Journal Article: This type of scholarly resource is a subset of scholarly articles that reports the original finding of an observational or experimental research study. Common aspects found within an empirical article include: literature review, methodology, results, and discussion.
Adapted from “Evaluating Resources: Defining Scholarly Resources,” located in Research Guides in the GCU Library.
☐ The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Utilize writing resources such as Grammarly, LopesWrite report, and ThinkingStorm to check your writing.