NUR-550 Literature Review – Resubmission
NUR-550 Literature Review – Resubmission
NUR-550 Literature Review – Resubmission
NUR-550 Literature Review – Resubmission NUR 590 Topic 1 Assignment Submit your literature review from NUR-550 for your NUR-590 instructor to review. If your NUR-550 instructor indicated areas for revision be sure to incorporate these improvements prior to submitting your paper for this assignment.
You will use the revised literature review for your final written paper in Topic, 8 detailing your evidence-based practice project proposal.
Having Trouble Meeting Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NUR-550 Literature Review – Resubmission completed on time. avoid delay and – ORDER NOW
Click here to ORDER NOW FOR AN ORIGINAL PAPER ASSIGNMENT on NUR-550 Literature Review – Resubmission
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
Struggling to Meet Your Deadline?
Get your assignment on NUR-550 Literature Review – Resubmission done on time by medical experts. Don’t wait – ORDER NOW!
You are not required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite.
NUR-590 Course Objectives
In this course, the learner will:
- Explore research articles, nursing and related theories, applying levels of evidence, and theoretical frameworks to identify quality research studies.
- Demonstrate understanding of scientific inquiry, knowledge generation,utilization, and dissemination in advanced nursing practice.
- Evaluate the evidence for potential solutions/innovations that can potentially solve a health care issue and improve patient outcomes.
- Identify gaps in nursing knowledge and evidence-based practice that can potentially be resolved by planning and implementing a practice change project proposal.
- Evaluate health policy and advocacy issues for the purpose of improving health care outcomes.
- Propose quality improvement initiatives that advance the delivery of safe, high-quality health care.
- Design culturally appropriate clinical prevention interventions and population-based care that reduces risks, prevents disease, and promotes health and well-being
“A life threatening, life-altering emergency, sepsis can have catastrophic effects. When the condition progresses undetected, it can lead to multiple organ dysfunction syndrome and death. Mortality ranges from 9% to 35% and rises sharply with each passing hour that sepsis goes unidentified” (Cordona; 2017). Therefore my PICOT is In adult or pediatric patients who meet Systematic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS) criteria and/or Hospital Acquired Infection (P), does early detection and intervention (I), When compared to late detection and intervention (C) can lead to improve mortality rate and patient outcomes (O) in 6 months (T)
My target population is adult and pediatric patients in the hospital or inpatient setting, and primary intervention is education. Sepsis protocols with weight based fluids and antibiotics are standard healthcare practice for most facilities, but without proper education on what sepsis looks like and its severity for healthcare workers regardless of specialty can delay care and increase mortality.”Sepsis can develop in both the community and the hospital. So all nurses—not just those working in emergency departments, intensive care units, and transport teams— must know how to assess for and identify early warning signs of sepsis” Education in the form of interactive learning, mock drills, and team exercices have shown to be beneficial in retaining knowledge in adult learning. Quite often a patient has unidentified sepsis or develops sepsis from an Hospital Acquired Infection (HAI) and complicates the initial issue or comorbidity they are being treated for. Early detection with proper education can decrease mortality and improve patient outcomes
Cardona ML. How to recognize and intervene for pediatric sepsis: learn how prompt action can save patient’s lives. American Nurse Today. 2017;12(3):6. Accessed June 18, 2023. https://search-ebscohost-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsgao&AN=edsgcl.491329272&site=eds-live&scope=site
Optional: Grammarly
For additional information, the following is recommended:
Grammarly is an online writing assistance app that reviews written submissions and suggests context-specific corrections for grammar, spelling, word usage, wordiness, style, punctuation, and plagiarism. The reasoning for each suggested correction is provided, allowing users to make informed decisions about how to correct writing issues.
Grammarly can be installed as free browser extension, though Grammarly Premium requires an annual subscription. This subscription is not a GCU-required purchase.
NUR 590 Topic 2 DQ 1
Compare two organizational readiness tools. Identify the tool you selected and explain why it is most appropriate for assessing your organization.
The two organizational readiness tool that I had chosen are The Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) and the Organization Readiness Change Assessment (ORCA). The organization’s readiness assessment for change is a crucial factor in the implementation phase of any given public health intervention (“Selecting A Tool”, n.d.). These tools can assist in evidenced-based practice (EBP) interventions. The Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care Questionnaire also known as PACIC is a tool that is used to make an evaluation of the perspective of the patient with regards to the receipt of patient care delivery in the 5 domains namely: activation, delivery system, goal setting, problem solving, and follow-up (Gensichen et al., 2011). PACIC tool can be used for conditions that incurable and illnesses that lasts for a prolonged period time. On the other hand, the ORCA tool has 4 main purposes: learning about the degree of motivation, assessment of organizational abilities, improvement of organizational capacities, and empowerment of organizations (Dearing, 2018).
The most appropriate tool for assessing my organization is the ORCA tool because it can help with identifying and monitoring of organizational strengths and weakness or an organization (“Organizational Readiness”, 2017).By using this tool in clinical settings which it was originally intended for, can help with providing support and success of EBP.
NUR-550 Literature Review – Resubmission References
Dearing, J. (2018). Organizational readiness tools for global health intervention: A review. Frontiers In Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00056
Gensichen J, Serras A, Paulitsch MA, Rosemann T, König J, Gerlach FM, Petersen JJ. (2011).The Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care questionnaire: Evaluation in patients with mental disorders in primary care. Community Ment Health J, 47(4):447-53. doi: 10.1007/s10597-010-9340-2.
“Organizational Readiness”. (2017). National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools. http://www.nccmt.ca/resources/search/187.
“Selecting A Tool”.(n.d.). National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools. https://www.nccmt.ca/knowledge-repositories/search/279
Organizational readiness assessments allow for change leaders and champions to assess key areas of organization structure, stability and culture in order to make an informed decision as to whether or not a change or improvement initiative is going to be successful, and the right intervention at the right time (HRSA, 2021). Upon comparison of two different examples of organizational readiness assessments designed for healthcare, there are certainly similarities but also differences that must be considered when selecting one that is right for a particular organization and initiative.
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) has an evidence-based safety and teamwork communication program by the name of TeamSTEPPS. This evidence-based program has been around for 20 years, and is now an evidence-based intervention effective at improving perceptions of teamwork, communication and trust, as well as sound data supporting improved patient safety metrics in an organization (AHRQ, 2021). With this, a readiness assessment is highlighted as a key part of the process to ensure an organization is ready for TeamSTEPPS implementation. Utilizing the AHRQ TeamSTEPPS Readiness Assessment, areas of defined need, readiness for change in culture, time/resources/personnel, and sustainment of the change are assessed in a checklist format that is easy-to-use for any individual assessing whether or not this intervention is right for one’s organization (AHRQ, 2021).
Comparatively, the Maryland Healthcare Commission (2019) provides a tool for healthcare organizations interested in implementing a standardized telehealth program with aim to improve the safety, quality, fiscal stewardship and patient experience side of healthcare. The readiness assessment provided- includes core readiness, financial considerations, operations, staff engagement and patient readiness. Maryland Healthcare Commission highlights a toolkit they’ve created to guide the assessment of successful improvement of one’s healthcare system telehealth practices.
Advanced Nursing Research: From Theory to Practice
Tappan, R. M. (2016). Advanced nursing research: From theory to practice (2nd ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. ISBN-13: 9781284048308
LopesWrite
Refer to the LopesWrite webpage for guidance regarding assignments requiring submission to LopesWrite.
Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare : A Guide to Best Practice
Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2019). Evidence-based practice in nursing and healthcare: A guide to best practice (4th ed.). Wolters Kluwer. ISBN-13: 9781496384539
RefWorks and EndNote: RefWorks and EndNote Login
Manage your citations with the RefWorks tool, located on the GCU Library website. RefWorks automates the creation of your reference lists in the format of your choice (APA, MLA, etc.).
Academic Integrity
Read the “About LopesWrite” and “Plagiarism” sections of the Academic Integrity page of the GCU website.
Library Walk Through Tutorial
View the “Library Walk Through Tutorial.”
Discussion Forum Guidelines and Example
Review the “Discussion Forum Guidelines and Example” document for your weekly discussion forum participation.
Optional: ThinkingStorm
For additional information, the following is recommended:
ThinkingStorm is an online tutoring resource that provides flexible support to supplement traditional educational environments. The tutoring center is remotely accessible to GCU learners with a computer and an Internet connection and offers convenient hours for learners with busy schedules. ThinkingStorm tutoring includes a writing center that offers 24/7 submission-based writing support, as well as live writing support across the curriculum.
If you are interested in utilizing ThinkingStorm’s writing support, submit your documents chapter by chapter, rather than as a full manuscript.
To assist learners with thei
…
APA Writing Style
APA Style is required for all writing assignments in this course, where indicated. Please prepare these assignments according to the APA Style Guide, located in the in the Student Success Center.
You may want to consider purchasing a copy of the APA style guide as this will be a useful resource throughout your program. NUR-550 Literature Review – Resubmission NUR 590 Topic 1 Assignment
University Policy Handbook
Read the Code of Conduct and Academic Standards section of the University Policy Handbook.
The Writing Process
View “The Writing Process” media presentation for information on how to strengthen your writing for future assignments.
Reading a Scientific Article
Read “Reading a Scientific Article,” located on the GCU Library website.